The Comey transcript: https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...lary-clintons-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
For those demanding that people eat crow for suggesting her activities were illegal:
For those alleging that there is no evidence that her server was hacked and even that her email was likely more secure than States':
Of course no ones going to prosecute a Clinton. You want to die of a mysterious "suicide"?
Good faith discussion isn't fskimospy's strong suit....just saying.There was no citation of the claim. There still hasn't been despite repeated requests. It is becoming more clear with every post that the accuser has no intention of acting in anything resembling good will, as such I feel no obligation to continue responding until the good faith effort of a citation is provided.
Considering that the state department computers were hacked and hers were not, I'd say any incompetence in handling classified material you are whining about are negated by her competence in keeping that material safe!
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clintons personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clintons use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clintons personal e-mail account.
That's the true beauty of democracy: We get the leaders we deserve.So to sum it all up, Hillary being too careless or stupid translates into 'no intent'. Fine and dandy. So, this November we have a choice between a massively boorish dbag and a total incompetent can't grasp the notion that she should stay on the side obvious compliance with law vs pushing the line. We are so f*cked as a nation.
lol Arkanside - the act of committing suicide by shooting oneself behind the ear with a rifle. I'd forgotten those.Of course no ones going to prosecute a Clinton. You want to die of a mysterious "suicide"?
PROVING it is illegal requires a trial. However, its illegality can easily be seen by any who care to look.So, how does all that prove it was illegal? Just commence eating crow.
See the announcement by Paul Ryan after the FBI released NO CHARGES?
Ryan statement: "while I respect the FBI, this decision is ridiculous."
For those that need translation for what Ryan meant, Ryan actually meant:
WHILE I RESPECT THE FBI, THEY DROPPED THE BALL.
SO....... NOW MY REPUBLICAN CONGRESS WILL CONDUCT OUR OWN INVESTIGATION.
WE WILL HAVE THE LAST WORD CONCERNING CHARGES OR NO CHARGES.
NATURALLY, WE WILL FIND CHARGES.
And THAt is how it goes.
They never see things but through their twisted corrupt republican vision. Or envisions.
Nuff said?
The Comey transcript: https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...lary-clintons-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
For those demanding that people eat crow for suggesting her activities were illegal:
For those alleging that there is no evidence that her server was hacked and even that her email was likely more secure than States':
You can't seriously believe this. How is a home PC running a Home version of Windows more secure than an Exchange server running a (presumably) hardened Windows Server software?
So to sum it all up, Hillary being too careless or stupid translates into 'no intent'. Fine and dandy. So, this November we have a choice between a massively boorish dbag and a total incompetent can't grasp the notion that she should stay on the side obvious compliance with law vs pushing the line. We are so f*cked as a nation.
Emphasis added.
To warrant a criminal charge, Mr. Comey said, there had to be evidence that Mrs. Clinton intentionally sent or received classified information something that the F.B.I. did not find.
However, its illegality can easily be seen by any who care to look.
Well, reality sets in for republicans...
Straw man or just stupid? Which are you? Here's what I said:
Each one of the others knowingly purloined classified info from a "secure server" to their home computers.
Hilary Clinton did no such thing. Got that?
In terms of the hacks, Comey absolutely has to say that and it's not an indictment of her personal server any more than it would be for a State Department email system we know with 100% certainty was hacked in 2014 for many months. Basically, Comey is stating something very obvious to any IT security professional, that there's no way to prove it one way or the other that a hack occurred. It is absolutely true.
So speculation is equal to fact? Got it. Now I see what your problem is.
Yes, because it's true. Running your own email server, web site, web forum, etc. requires more competent security than a home PC typically meaning active security measures (monitoring). I can't imagine why you would think otherwise outside of complete ignorance.
Huh? You wrote words, jumbled them together and yet they still make no sense, lol.
Why is hardened Windows Server software, irrespective of the hardware, equal to or less secure than Windows Home software?
The Challenges of Securing Your Email
While the tools and capabilities have improved in the past decade, the truth is that you have to be a highly skilled system administrator to properly manage your email in a secure manner — even if you’re not the senior diplomat for the United States.
First of all, you don't know that, you're trying to re-write the narrative. Hillary's emails which are public show a pattern when articles, memos, and other documents are "cut and pasted" into an email text.
So are you now going to say "cut and paste" the contents of classified documents into an email is different from taking the document itself?
And even if you did "know" what was in those documents, does that matter? Some of the people prosecuted did nothing more than take notes on classified conversations or take manuals on classified systems home to study, presumably for work. That would be how military types get nailed.
Got that?
To warrant a criminal charge, Mr. Comey said, there had to be evidence that Mrs. Clinton intentionally sent or received classified information something that the F.B.I. did not find.
It really wasn't appropriate for him to speculate on that or add his personal commentary on how "irresponsible" it may have been. The facts can speak for themselves, Comey was just giving his party soundbites.