As I said, 25 years and it obviously works.
She clearly did something wrong here and I'll attack her on that basis.Seriously, learn to read and understand what you read.
Meanwhile, clean up the straw.
House Speaker Paul Ryan said the GOP-controlled House would hold hearings on the FBI's recommendation not to seek criminal charges against Hillary Clinton and that FBI director James Comey should testify.
"There are a lot of unanswered questions here," Ryan told Megyn Kelly on Fox News Tuesday night.
And let the hearings begin! Wonder if they have enough time between now and the election to surpass the number of Benghazi hearings.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statep...linton-email-probe-b99756586z1-385594691.html
She clearly did something wrong here and I'll attack her on that basis.
And let the hearings begin! Wonder if they have enough time between now and the election to surpass the number of Benghazi hearings.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statep...linton-email-probe-b99756586z1-385594691.html
Johnson asked the director in the letter: "What is the difference, in the FBI's view, between extreme carelessness and gross negligence?"
"From my standpoint it was unbelievably reckless for Secretary Clinton to expose America's national security information to our enemies," he said. "And she did it to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act."
I found this opinion piece about a New Republic article to be interesting. It hits some points I agree with.
The GOP has actively downplayed logical thinking for decades. That's how they ended up with Trump.
New Republic article:
https://newrepublic.com/article/134667/conservatives-groomed-perfect-suckers-trumps-epic-scam
The crimes were listed and detailed, but not acted upon.So GOP thinks FBI is their KGB, there to just go after their political enemies?
The crimes were listed and detailed, but not acted upon.
It's a massive disconnect to be resolved.
In case you weren't paying attention the TPP is 6 years old at most. So I don't know where you are getting this 25 years old crap. Hillary's support for the TPP is worrisome enough... and real enough that you don't even need to think of any fake controversies.
______________
She clearly did something wrong here and I'll attack her on that basis.
The 25 years "crap" means that for the past 25 years I've watched the Republican smear machine working 24/7 against the both Bill and Hillary Clinton. I've watched them be accused of multiple murders, drug smuggling, that Chelsea is the daughter of a man other than Bill, espionage (Bill went to the USSR when he was a college student so of course the Soviets turned him.) and all sorts more corruption unimaginable.
The end result? Folks like you thinking that they are the veritable source of all evil in the known and unknown universe when really all they happen to be are a couple of fairly typical American politicians. They seem to have the same ambitions, the same foibles/behavior patterns as pretty much anyone else doing the same shit. They're better than some and worse than others. But they get judged by standards that most folks wouldn't even consider for other politicians.
I'd suggest taking a long hard look at what you believe about her and how you might have come to hold those beliefs.
The crimes were listed and detailed, but not acted upon.
It's a massive disconnect to be resolved.
Extreme carelessness isnt criminal, at least when it comes to handling classified information.
Thats the consensus of experts in national security law, who werent surprised that the FBI isnt recommending an indictment for Hillary Clinton and her staff related to her use of a private email server, saying such a move would have set a bold new standard for such cases.
Story Continued Below
It would have been a real long-shot to shoehorn Secretary Clintons conduct into the existing federal criminal laws, said Stephen Vladeck of the University of Texas School of Law. I dont think this was the case in which to pursue unprecedented interpretations of those statutes.
The end result? Folks like you thinking that they are the veritable source of all evil in the known and unknown universe when really all they happen to be are a couple of fairly typical American politicians
I'd suggest taking a long hard look at what you believe about her and how you might have come to hold those beliefs.
the above goes for you too...
Wow you don't fucking get it do you. For the longest time there was a difference between the republican and democrat parties in terms of economic issues and how they wanted to treat the middle class.
Now more and more with recent election cycles both parties are becoming more and more wholly owned by corporate interests.
I used to say that republicans were wholly owned by corporate interests and democrats only partially so (mainly the blue-dogs). Unfortunately that is changing as banks have become too big to fail their CEO's have also become too big to jail...
You want to know what my beliefs are.
I believe that the Vince Foster conspiracy theory is fucking stupid just like the idea that people didn't land on the moon.
I believe that President Clinton should never have had an impeachment trial because trying to bring someone to court for lying about sex is one of the stupidest things that the government was involved in in the past 20 years or so.
I believe that President Clinton should get a pass on NAFTA because it was one of the first passed the country as a whole had no experience with such a thing and only one well know person was warning us about it.
Turns out Ross Perot for all his crazy ideas was right about it. And a lot of people were wrong for not believing him.
Yet we collectively overall have learned nothing from it. Because people like you are ignoring the TPP....
Do you want to know why I don't support this fake liberal candidate that the democrat party is shoving in our faces.
Sure she's much better than the republicans on social issues but that doesn't impact Wall Street's bottom line as much as her positions on economic trade deals and bankruptcy laws.
Let's hear a story about a First Lady who stopped a pretty horrid bankruptcy bill from being signed by President Clinton... seems like a happy ending eh?
well pay attention to this. And you'll she how easy it was for her to sellout.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg&t=1m24s
^a highlight
Then the sad ending detailing how a First Lady became a Senator and then voted yes a new version of the bill that she stopped her husband from signing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg&t=3m20s
Now given that story told by Senator Warren herself which highlights how Senator Clinton was influenced by Wall Street interests to vote yes on a version of the bill that she prevented her husband who was president at the time....
Maybe you can see some of the reasons why I don't trust that she isn't beholden to corporate interests despite her more gullible supporters scoffing at the idea that she can be bought.
Do you think I'm voting for Trump... fuck off if you think that... he may fool some useful idiots with his anti-free trade bill talk but like Hillary's democratic platform delegates voting yes on TPP Trump's actions also speak louder than words. He uses chinese made goods for his clothing lines he doesn't let workers at his hotels unionize.
Fuck Trump too.
Maybe you should look long and hard at yourself and ask yourself why you're supporting Senator Clinton after she sold out on a free Trade deal that would be much more harmful than NAFTA and sold out on a harmful bankruptcy bill that she initially opposed but then supported after she became Senator and those corporate donations became oh so tempting.
She may be the lesser of too evils but the choice between Clinton and Trump is like choosing between quicksand and a bullet to the face.
the above goes for you too...
_______________
You had me right up until you said BC should get a pass on NAFTA -- nope, he must not get a pass on that and the many other things he did to hurt the middle class. And yes, Ross Perot WAS right and when you compare his pronouncements about those trade deals and the consequence of them to those that were pushing the deal, including BC, how can anyone, more than 20 years later, pretend the proponents of those deals were right.
Do you really think this post represents reality? Do you really think they just are in it to work for the people and some evil vast right wing conspiracy is just out to get these noble and selfless saints?The 25 years "crap" means that for the past 25 years I've watched the Republican smear machine working 24/7 against the both Bill and Hillary Clinton. I've watched them be accused of multiple murders, drug smuggling, that Chelsea is the daughter of a man other than Bill, espionage (Bill went to the USSR when he was a college student so of course the Soviets turned him.) and all sorts more corruption unimaginable.
The end result? Folks like you thinking that they are the veritable source of all evil in the known and unknown universe when really all they happen to be are a couple of fairly typical American politicians. They seem to have the same ambitions, the same foibles/behavior patterns as pretty much anyone else doing the same shit. They're better than some and worse than others. But they get judged by standards that most folks wouldn't even consider for other politicians.
I'd suggest taking a long hard look at what you believe about her and how you might have come to hold those beliefs.
Perhaps you're right. Unlike the shill Victarion Gray(joy), I'll have to consider what you have said. I was thinking that President Clinton should perhaps get a pass because most everyone had no real conception of the harm it might do to the U.S. economy. Maybe I was wrong in saying it.
______________
Perhaps you're right. Unlike the shill Victarion Gray(joy), I'll have to consider what you have said. I was thinking that President Clinton should perhaps get a pass because most everyone had no real conception of the harm it might do to the U.S. economy. Maybe I was wrong in saying it.
______________
Do you really think this post represents reality? Do you really think they just are in it to work for the people and some evil vast right wing conspiracy is just out to get these noble and selfless saints?
In this case, there was evidence of crimes, it isn't some made up fantasy. There was fire here and not just smoke.
I checked the article, and they have a compelling question. It's what many Americans want to know.
Do you really think this post represents reality? Do you really think they just are in it to work for the people and some evil vast right wing conspiracy is just out to get these noble and selfless saints?
In this case, there was evidence of crimes, it isn't some made up fantasy. There was fire here and not just smoke.
Wow you don't fucking get it do you. For the longest time there was a difference between the republican and democrat parties in terms of economic issues and how they wanted to treat the middle class.
Now more and more with recent election cycles both parties are becoming more and more wholly owned by corporate interests.
I used to say that republicans were wholly owned by corporate interests and democrats only partially so (mainly the blue-dogs). Unfortunately that is changing as banks have become too big to fail their CEO's have also become too big to jail...
You want to know what my beliefs are.
I believe that the Vince Foster conspiracy theory is fucking stupid just like the idea that people didn't land on the moon.
I believe that President Clinton should never have had an impeachment trial because trying to bring someone to court for lying about sex is one of the stupidest things that the government was involved in in the past 20 years or so.
I believe that President Clinton should get a pass on NAFTA because it was one of the first passed the country as a whole had no experience with such a thing and only one well know person was warning us about it.
Turns out Ross Perot for all his crazy ideas was right about it. And a lot of people were wrong for not believing him.
Yet we collectively overall have learned nothing from it. Because people like you are ignoring the TPP....
Do you want to know why I don't support this fake liberal candidate that the democrat party is shoving in our faces.
Sure she's much better than the republicans on social issues but that doesn't impact Wall Street's bottom line as much as her positions on economic trade deals and bankruptcy laws.
Let's hear a story about a First Lady who stopped a pretty horrid bankruptcy bill from being signed by President Clinton... seems like a happy ending eh?
well pay attention to this. And you'll she how easy it was for her to sellout.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg&t=1m24s
^a highlight
Then the sad ending detailing how a First Lady became a Senator and then voted yes a new version of the bill that she stopped her husband from signing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12mJ-U76nfg&t=3m20s
Now given that story told by Senator Warren herself which highlights how Senator Clinton was influenced by Wall Street interests to vote yes on a version of the bill that she prevented her husband who was president at the time....
Maybe you can see some of the reasons why I don't trust that she isn't beholden to corporate interests despite her more gullible supporters scoffing at the idea that she can be bought.
Do you think I'm voting for Trump... fuck off if you think that... he may fool some useful idiots with his anti-free trade bill talk but like Hillary's democratic platform delegates voting yes on TPP Trump's actions also speak louder than words. He uses chinese made goods for his clothing lines he doesn't let workers at his hotels unionize.
Fuck Trump too.
Maybe you should look long and hard at yourself and ask yourself why you're supporting Senator Clinton after she sold out on a free Trade deal that would be much more harmful than NAFTA and sold out on a harmful bankruptcy bill that she initially opposed but then supported after she became Senator and those corporate donations became oh so tempting.
She may be the lesser of too evils but the choice between Clinton and Trump is like choosing between quicksand and a bullet to the face.
the above goes for you too...
_______________