well, it looks like its the exact same game, just rendered in 3D. So it should not be any better or worse than the original.
Which for me is a pass. I dont love hack n slash as much as I used to. We have much better games nowadays. Not paying 20 bucks for the exact same experience as 22 years ago.
They appear to be running the original game encapsulated in the new game. They appear to be capturing all the input and then re-routing it to the original game (when they want). The original game running under the hood is performing extremely poorly compared to running the original game standalone, and the input routing does not appear to be setup properly either.
Not to mention they have to try and map the 3d rendered version to the underlying game (which they've already messed up the input to) and also somehow translate the 25fps core game update to any/all refresh rates.
None of these things seems to me like an impossible task, but based on how the beta was I have the sense they are doing this in ways that have a damn lot of downfalls or weaknesses and struggle to make up for them. Certain things
should never have been messed up in the first place. I fully expected the legacy mode to play
just like the original game, but it doesn't. Legacy mode was actually damn near unplayable.
I had to break out the original game to see if maybe the original game was just disjointed and choppy like legacy mode is in remastered, and maybe I had forgotten.
I hadn't.
The remastered version is a travesty.