I travel alot for work too, and guess what, even the cheapest seediest hotels have free interwebs. If I'm where I can't find internet, usually that means I can't play a game anyway. At that point I'll just rent a hooker. Or maybe, gasp..read a book.
If it is really as big a deal to the lot you complaining then complain to Blizzard. Maybe they'll change it. It's happened before.
As for accepting or not accepting it, I would say the fact that it is Blizzard sways a lot of people simply because of the games. Ubisoft didn't fail because of the DRM, they failed because of crappy games with DRM. Who knows, this game could be crappy too in which case, the DRM issue is still moot.
I have been at hotels that want 10 bucks a day for the wifi access(Marriot). I am not paying 10 bucks to play diablo 3 for a few hours when I already BOUGHT IT. Thats fine that you would just do something else and not care. My point is that you shouldnt have to. Its a flawed way of doing business and shitty to a percentage of their customers
I've never cared about this type of DRM. I have plenty of other offline games to satisfy my needs, and if not then I'll go do something else. Not having Internet usually means I'm somewhere where I'm not playing games anyways or I'm on hold for 5 hours so I have my chance to yell at my ISP as well.
good for you
gothamhunter said:
OH NO! THIS SINGLEPLAYER GAME WON'T LET ME PLAY WHEN I HAVE NO INTERNETS!
Because, you know, we all remember the countless hours we stuck into single player Diablo 2...
FTFY
gothamhunter said:
Then don't buy it I guess. The rest of us will enjoy it for the MP, the only real reason to play it
gothamhunter said:
Then you never really played Diablo 2
Next lameass argument? .
because on a pub with 12 year olds calling everyone faggots is the only way to truly enjoy a MP game......
gothamhunter said:
lol really?
You make an argument about the business decision of the company (and other companies who have similar restrictions in place) based off a certain personal scenario that you came up with, except that your argument is flawed based on the actions proceeding your reasoning. If anyone is being judgemental, it's you being so against these companies.
thats what you are doing, and you are bagging on anyone that sugguest the way you want to play D3 is inferior and that the person is stupid....
has SC2 been hacked and pirated yet? i ask because i dont know and it uses a similar "always on" DRM
however SC2 offers an offline mode as well for single player. and then simply synce your acheivements and all that crap with your Bnet accnt when you go online. Really is no reason D3 could not do the same
on the topic of SP vs MP. D2 came out in 2K and LOD in 2k1, i never played it online untill 2005, the game is a single player based game. for the most part the MP was just grouping with others to get better drops. or if you were an ass hacking it and PKing people
TBH they could simply have reused the seperate chars for online and offline modes in D2. I actually really liked that, i hacked the crap out of the SP and used the item editior to test out specs and item sets and then worked for and traded for those online. kinda sucks you wont be able to do that
exactly, the saddest part is they have been down this road already, and here they are trying again, when they already have a better system
the saddest thing in this thread is yet another illustration of the US is falling apart around us, posters blasting other posters, not because their concern on right/wrong is invalid, but because they dont care and deem the others stupid for caring about it.
does anyone think people that want to play SP only give a ratass about the auction shit? *IF* I buy it, which I probably wont if this DRM is included, I will play MP to do coop runs just like I did D2, with friends, over the net. I will be very unlikely to do much of anything in the auction house or anything else
but if this policy stands I will vote with my wallet against it just like I did with SC2.