Dianne Feinstein Withholding Letter Accusing Brett Kavanaugh of Sexual Misconduct

[imported_tajmahal]

Need to link that

" The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.252b974826a6

So she doesn't know the year of when it happened, or where it happened or how many boys were in the room (according to the therapist's notes) when it happened, but by golly she knows it was President Trump's choice to be a Supreme Court Justice.

Yep.

 

[trenchfoot]

Need to link that

From what I've heard on cable news the psychiatrist may have mistakenly wrote four instead of two.

My thinking as far as that discrepancy is concerned is there may have been four guys in the room but only two of them were having their way with the girl.

Just my WAG on that.

 

[Ichinisan]

This is simply BS on your part.

They are not perfect, but there is a reason intelligence agencies use them. Its true they are not sufficiently definitive to use in a criminal court of law, but they are in fact a piece of supporting evidence which can be used to help assess the credibility of someone's testimony. (It is possible for someone to be nervous enough to flunk a polygraph even when being truthful, but that's not what is at issue here.)

The criteria for Supreme Court Justice being confirmed as a nominee is supposed to be significantly different than there might not be enough to convict the individual in a criminal court of law.

No. They are absolute 100% bullshit and they always have been. Period.

 

[Ichinisan]

lol its junk science. ive taken one, lied my ass off and passed it.

PSA: never ever take a polygraph if you are accused of something.

Even saying "junk science" implies that there's actual science. There isn't.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Need to link that

"Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dec5b6cd2f1d

 

[imported_tajmahal]

No. They are absolute 100% bullshit and they always have been. Period.

But, but, but when ex-agent Strzok gave her the test he says she passed with flying colors with no bias. /S

 

[brycejones]

But, but, but when ex-agent Strzok gave her the test he says she passed with flying colors with no bias. /S

That sounds like something between you and your little buddy, along with your Clinton fantasies.

 

[OutHouse]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

 

[zinfamous]

Apparently she has notes dating back to 2012 detailing the assault, way before Kavanaugh was considered.

Unfortunately I don't see much coming off of this, GOP will just ignore it and force him through.

GOP politicians sure do have an unhealthy history of forcing things into places where they don't belong.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

Why don't you just go this route? https://www.instagram.com/p/BnwjBsVnSN1/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

 

[Starbuck1975]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

I have not seen any reputable news outlet report this. The only place this seems to be popping up is in twitter threads. Citation needed.

 

[zinfamous]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

well, people are saying.

 

[Indus]

well, people are saying.

Well we know the fix is in.

For example Susan Collins called for Al Franken to resign when he didn't rape or try to rape anyone but she will still vote for Kavanaugh.

 

[Jhhnn]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

Desperate grasping at the straws of coincidence. If such even exists.

 

[baydude]

How much damage to the dems would this have in November if their tactic doesn’t work to stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation? (Whether it’s proven false or not enough credible evidence)

 

[allisolm]

Turns out that Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in in a 1996 home-foreclosure case in which the defendants were the parents of Kavanaugh’s last-minute attempted-rape accuser Christine Blasey Ford.

Not a lawyer here, so maybe I am reading it wrong, but the only thing I see Judge Kavanaugh ruled on was a motion to dismiss the case against her parents which would make her a fan of the judge rather than someone with a bone to pick.

https://af-mg.com/2018/09/17/breaki...oreclosure-case-guess-whos-mom-was-the-judge/

 

[trenchfoot]

If Kavanaugh gets his seat he better hang on to it and enjoy it for all it's worth because if the Democrats gets the House they can impeach his ass, even if it's just to get even with what McConnell did to Obama.

edit - And what of all of those other guys from both parties that got fired, removed from office, etc. because they were accused of sexually harassing women? So what's good for them is not good for Kavanaugh because of some political agenda that makes Judge Kavanaugh above the law and Judge Roy Moore not so?

 

[cfenton]

How much damage to the dems would this have in November if their tactic doesn’t work to stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation? (Whether it’s proven false or not enough credible evidence)

How would it hurt the Democrats? If the GOP force through his nomination without an investigation, then it's just one more thing the Democrats can point to as an example of poor decision making by the GOP. If there is an investigation and the allegation turns out to be false, then they can say they did their due diligence. However, if the allegation is true, then the Democrats get a chance at a more moderate nominee. The only way I could see this hurting the Democrats is if a Democrat paid Ford to make these accusations and they are false. That is very, very, unlikely.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

If Kavanaugh gets his seat he better hang on to it and enjoy it for all it's worth because if the Democrats gets the House they can impeach his ass, even if it's just to get even with what McConnell did to Obama.

edit - And what of all of those other guys from both parties that got fired, removed from office, etc. because they were accused of sexually harassing women? So what's good for them is not good for Kavanaugh because of some political agenda that makes Judge Kavanaugh above the law and Judge Roy Moore not so?

I remember a Constitution where people were innocent until proven guilty. I guess you've never read your copy of it.

 

[Moonbeam]

I remember a Constitution where people were innocent until proven guilty. I guess you've never read your copy of it.

You remember nothing because you have been claiming the woman charging your judge is guilty of lying when you actually have no idea. That is morally disgraceful to be such a hypocrite.

 

[HomerJS]

I remember a Constitution where people were innocent until proven guilty. I guess you've never read your copy of it.

Nobody as proclaimed his guilt. We just want an open hearing on all the accusations.

 

[Lanyap]

Not a lawyer here, so maybe I am reading it wrong, but the only thing I see Judge Kavanaugh ruled on was a motion to dismiss the case against her parents which would make her a fan of the judge rather than someone with a bone to pick.

https://af-mg.com/2018/09/17/breaki...oreclosure-case-guess-whos-mom-was-the-judge/

It looks like the mortgage company filed a motion to dismiss and Kavanaugh granted it.
To see the court case type156006V at the bottom of the search page.
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryByCaseNum.jis

Case Information
Court System: Circuit Court for Montgomery County - Civil System
Case Number: 156006V Sub Type: FORECLOSURE
Date Filed: 08/08/1996
Case Status: CLOSED
Plaintiff Information
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Plaintiff is displayed)
Name: UMLIC-EIGHT CORP A NORTH CAROLINA CORP
Address: 7415 PINEVILLE MATTHEWS 1010
CHARLOTTE NC 28200

Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff
Name: PRICE, RICHARD M
Address: PEABODY & BROWN
1255 23RD STREET N.W. #800
WASHINGTON DC 20037
Phone: 202-973-7700

Defendant Information
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Defendant is displayed)
Name: BLASEY, RALPH G
Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854
Name: BLASEY, PAULA K
Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854
Issues Information
Issue: FORECLOSURE
Issue: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY
Document Tracking
Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 1
Docket Description: PETITION
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: PETITIONER'S PETITION TO FORECLOSE AND FOR SALE OF PROPERTY, EXHIBITS A1-6 & B, STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT, AND CERTIFIED COPY OF ASSIGNMENT (EXHIBIT B) FILED.
Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 2
Docket Description: MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, FILED.
Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 3
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Open
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FILING A NOMINAL BOND FILED.
Docket Date: 08/09/1996 Docket Number: 4
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: MEMORANDUM SENT GIVING NOTICE OF NEW CASE NUMBER FILED.
Docket Date: 08/13/1996 Docket Number: 5
Docket Description: ORDER OF COURT
Docket Type: Docket
Ruling Judge: MASON, MICHAEL D
Docket Text: ORDER OF COURT (MASON, J./RICE, M.) GRANTING PETION FOR SALE OF PROPERTY; THAT HARRY J. KELLY IS HEREBY APPOINTED TRUSTEE TO MAKE THE SALE, TRUSTEE SHALL FILE A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF ($5,000.00) AND CONTINUE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SALE FILED. (COPIES MAILED)
Docket Date: 09/19/1996 Docket Number: 6
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: REVISED STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT FILED.
Docket Date: 09/19/1996 Docket Number: 7
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: RICHARD M. PRICE, ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION AS TO RULE 1-31- FOR ADMITTANCE TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND FILED.
Docket Date: 09/24/1996 Docket Number: 8
Docket Description: BOND & APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: BOND AND APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.00 FILED.
Docket Date: 01/27/1997 Docket Number: 9
Docket Description: MOTION, DISMISS
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Granted
Ruling Judge: KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G
Reference Docket(s): Ruling: 10
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR RETURN OF BOND FILED.
Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 10
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Ruling Status: Granted
Ruling Judge: KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G
Reference Docket(s): Motion: 9
Docket Text: ORDER OF COURT (KAVANAUGH, J./RICE, M.) THAT THE VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS IS HEREBY GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AND THAT THE BOND FILED BY HARRY J. KELLY AS TRUSTEE SHALL BE RELEASED AND RETURNED FILED. (COPIES MAILED (
Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 11
Docket Description: SUBSTITUTE COPY FOR ORIGINAL
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: COPY OF TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904-BLASEY AND POWER OF ATTORNEY, FIXED IN LIEU OF ORIGINAL FILED.
Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 12
Docket Description: ORIGINAL DEED OF TRUST & NOTE MAILED
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: ORIGNIAL TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904, WITHDRAWN AND MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED FROM RICHARD M. PRICE FILED.
Docket Date: 03/03/1997 Docket Number: 13
Docket Description: RETURN RECEIPT
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: RETURN RECEIPT FILED.
Go Back
This is an electronic case record. Full case information cannot be made available either because of legal restrictions on access to case records found in Maryland Rules, or because of the practical difficulties inherent in reducing a case record into an electronic format.

 

[Starbuck1975]

How would it hurt the Democrats? If the GOP force through his nomination without an investigation, then it's just one more thing the Democrats can point to as an example of poor decision making by the GOP. If there is an investigation and the allegation turns out to be false, then they can say they did their due diligence. However, if the allegation is true, then the Democrats get a chance at a more moderate nominee. The only way I could see this hurting the Democrats is if a Democrat paid Ford to make these accusations and they are false. That is very, very, unlikely.

This hurts the Democrats if under oath, the accusations fall apart, and Kavanaugh still moves forward. Political gambits are only worth it if they work.

If Kavanaugh survives this, expect Feinstein to fall under scrutiny, not to mention that the juvenile records of political leaders are now fair game, which I expect the GOP to start exploiting as an attack vector.

 

[allisolm]

To see the court case type156006V at the bottom of the search page.
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryByCaseNum.jis

Those are the documents in the link I provided. Am I missing something?

 

[Lanyap]

Those are the documents in the link I provided.

I found the original court document link and posted it since some here might not believe it's the actual case image. This breaking story seems to be hitting the conservative sites first. Have not seen it on MSM yet.