Again with that logic fallacy someone else tried to use. Passing a test doesn't make you the end all authority on a subject. Now, if you would like to be responsible and actually cite a legal scenario, case law, or something else to that effect which would show I don't have a leg to stand on then you might have some merit to a post in this thread. But since you didn't you can kiss my ass like every other idiot in here.
Fortunately for me I do know the laws surrounding my scenario quite well. Based off your posts, I'd say I know it better than the average crappy lawyer that could barely squeak by on a bar examine in 3 states can muster. Or at least one claiming to have such credentials on an internet forum. In case you haven't realized, this is the internet and I can be as candid I feel like when it comes to slapping down people who pretend like they know what they are talking about, but don't post facts when asked. Instead, people like you try to use a logic fallacy to make their point seem more poignant. Corporate Thug tried the same thing with both an equivalency fallacy of trying to equate my sale with his newegg one, and then by arguing from authority.
But please, I'll give you a fair shot. Enlighten us O' Great Lawyer of the internet how my case would have zero merit. I would love to relay in such information to my lawyer. And if it's any consolation, to the lawyers already seeking co-plaintiffs off AR15.com as well. Please oh please I would love to use authority against authority here.