Dick's is a bunch of *****.

[HumblePie]

This is hilarious. HP said my case w/ newegg was so different because they had a cancellation policy I had to agree to before submitting my order. Troy's says there was an inventory error JUST LIKE MY NEWEGG ORDER.

Dick's has a proviso JUST LIKE NEWEGG

http://www.dickssportinggoods.com/helpdesk/index.jsp?display=store&subdisplay=cancel

Cancellations Due to Order Processing Difficulties
Occasionally, orders or parts of an order are cancelled by our system for various reasons. Some reasons are:

The item(s) are not available.
Your payment information could not be verified.
The shipping address could not be verified.

If your order is cancelled, you will receive an important notice regarding your order via email, which will explain the reason for the cancellation. You will not be billed for any cancelled items.

So where is the difference?

My psychic abilities tell me OP will either come up with some irrelevant circumstance to try to distinguish his case or he'll just call me troll for not agreeing with him...

That provisio you linked to for DSG is for online sales only through Dickssportinggoods.com and not through their retail outlet. Unless they present me a piece of paper at the time of checkout that I must sign that gives them a cancellation notice it is not the same thing CT.


Nor were the items not available. They were still being manufacturered and delivered to DSG every week as the batches were being done.

 

[SP33Demon]

What I seek to gain is the item I paid $848 for. Nothing more and nothing less.

So now you're not going to sue for "mental anguish"? Oh man, this is rich.

 

[HumblePie]

So now you're not going to sue for "mental anguish"? Oh man, this is rich.

Oh man, your absurd proclamations are rich you troll. I stated from the onset that if I have to seek litigation I will go for the maximum allowable by law that I can. If that includes mental anguish then it will be added on. If that happens and it is awarded I'll enjoy watching CPA eat a sock It's very unlikely that it will even come to litigation as chances are DSG will enter an agreement with Troy to provide those of us with orders for the firearm to purchase said firearm at the price we paid and DSG will cover the difference from another retailer. The main reason is DSG stated they don't want to see another customer leave one of their stores with an AR15 in their hands again. That was part of their press release when they decided to pull all AR15s from their shelves.

When proper pressure is applied then DSG will cave in like another company. You just have to hit them where it hurts the most which is the bank account.

 

[HumblePie]

and as for your second assertion as to me backpedaling. No such thing. I said in the initial post that "I plan to seek legal action" which is what I'm doing. Drafting a letter to request DSG resolve this by providing me with my item is LEGAL ACTION. And there are further steps I will take if needed. The third post I made stated that IF I HAVE TO, which means later steps in the legal process, then those are the actions I was willing to take to resolve this issue. That has not changed in the slightest.

But the more you troll, the more idiotic you present yourself to rational adults.

 

[OutHouse]

Nope, I'm entitled to what I paid for. I will pursue more if I am forced to do so, but all I want is what I paid for. You guys are warping it all way out of proportion by trying to assign attributes to the scenario that don't exist.

you are not entitled to two things and two things only. the item or your money paid. Dicks gave you your money back plus MORE.

The seller is well within their right to cancel the order and refund the money you paid for any reason. If dicks kept your money i could understand, but you bitching like a little spoiled brat about "ITS MINE I WANT IT NOW!!!" "IM GOING TO SUE for mental anguish, WHAHHHHHHH" is way over the top retarded.

I cant imagine what you were like if you didnt get your way as a little kid.

 

[HumblePie]

you are not entitled to two things and two things only. the item or your money paid. Dicks gave you your money back plus MORE.

The seller is well within their right to refund you the money you paid for any reason. If dicks kept your money i could understand, but you bitching like a little spoiled brat about "ITS MINE I WANT IT NOW!!!" "IM GOING TO SUE, WHAHHHHHHH" is way over the top retarded.

LOL, you are so ignorant about the law with this post it is making my sides hurt from laughing at you.

 

[SP33Demon]

and as for your second assertion as to me backpedaling. No such thing. I said in the initial post that "I plan to seek legal action" which is what I'm doing. Drafting a letter to request DSG resolve this by providing me with my item is LEGAL ACTION. And there are further steps I will take if needed. The third post I made stated that IF I HAVE TO, which means later steps in the legal process, then those are the actions I was willing to take to resolve this issue. That has not changed in the slightest.

But the more you troll, the more idiotic you present yourself to rational adults.

So when you said this minutes ago, you were lying:
What I seek to gain is the item I paid $848 for. Nothing more and nothing less.

Just admit you mistyped it. Nobody gives a shit. But the fact of the matter is that you're all over the map.

Also, good luck on your mental anguish money now that you decided you want that again. While you're at it, you can tell them you were so stressed that it affected your ability to sleep, and that they should pay you for that as well. Real men don't act like this.

 

[HumblePie]

Update... looks like media outlets are starting to pick up the story.

militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2012/12/27/troy-issues-statement-on-dicks-sporting-goods/#more

Nothing major, but who knows what will happen. Many of the buyers disenfranchised over this are law enforcement officers as well. Even they are going to seek legal redress. Please I dare anyone in this thread to start laughing in the face of police officers going the same route I am.

 

[HumblePie]

So when you said this minutes ago, you were lying:
What I seek to gain is the item I paid $848 for. Nothing more and nothing less.

Just admit you mistyped it. Nobody gives a shit. But the fact of the matter is that you're all over the map.

Also, good luck on your mental anguish money now that you decided you want that again. While you're at it, you can tell them you were so stressed that it affected your ability to sleep, and that they should pay you for that as well.

Haha, no. I have not mistyped anything. Go READ my posts again you ignoramus and stop trying to post shit in ways I did not type them or other absurdities. My OP was logical, consistent, and concise. I made mention of my personal story, the actions I was taking, and disseminating useful information to others. For some reason that brought all the trolls out such as yourself. I think it's because the word Dicks in the in the OP personally. Or perhaps this is a legal issue dealing with a firearm. Maybe a bit of both.

But keep assuming that my OP consisted of shit like "OMG DICKS IS DICKS!!! GOING TO SUE!!! MENTAL ANGUISH!!! MUST HAVE ASSAULT WEAPON!!!" because that is what you and others seem to try to push that I was stating and every one of my posts have been far from that.

 

[Regs]

The perceived damages is what it will cost to place that item in my hands at the time of the breach in the contract. How many times does this have to be repeated?

We don't care what you perceived. If the law was written based on a individuals perception, then we would be a totalitarian state. The court of law cares about what a reasonable person would expect under the same circumstances. That's the bottom line, and that's how it will be decided. This is not black and white, and there is a huge grey area that have their own set of circumstances that have to be sorted through.

 

[SP33Demon]

Haha, no. I have not mistyped anything. Go READ my posts again you ignoramus and stop trying to post shit in ways I did not type them or other absurdities. My OP was logical, consistent, and concise. I made mention of my personal story, the actions I was taking, and disseminating useful information to others. For some reason that brought all the trolls out such as yourself. I think it's because the word Dicks in the in the OP personally. Or perhaps this is a legal issue dealing with a firearm. Maybe a bit of both.

But keep assuming that my OP consisted of shit like "OMG DICKS IS DICKS!!! GOING TO SUE!!! MENTAL ANGUISH!!! MUST HAVE ASSAULT WEAPON!!!" because that is what you and others seem to try to push that I was stating and every one of my posts have been far from that.

Here is exactly what you typed "you ignoramus" (big words for such a mental midget).

What I seek to gain is the item I paid $848 for. Nothing more and nothing less. If I have to buy the gun else where for $1500 or even $5000, DSG is liable for the difference. If I have to pay an additional amount in lawyer fees or court costs to force DSG to pay, then they are liable for that amount as well. I am not seeking consequential damages as I had no intention to resell the firearm. Nor was it an investment for me. If the court grants any other awards beyond compensatory damages I'm not going to turn them down.

Nowhere in the post did you mention that you are seeking your dipshit "mental anguish" punitive damages. Your post is there for all to read.

Again, you are not a man if you are still seeking money for "mental anguish". That is the mentality of an emotionally fragile, irrational woman. I'm glad I don't have to interact with people like you in my everyday life.

CorporateThug's post already showed that Dick's doesn't care about cancelled orders, just like Newegg. I can't wait until Dick's shoves your frivolous lawsuit back up your ass and makes you eat the court costs.

 

[mpo]

Update... looks like media outlets are starting to pick up the story.

militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2012/12/27/troy-issues-statement-on-dicks-sporting-goods/#more

Nothing major, but who knows what will happen. Many of the buyers disenfranchised over this are law enforcement officers as well. Even they are going to seek legal redress. Please I dare anyone in this thread to start laughing in the face of police officers going the same route I am.

Then you and your LEO friends must be pretty mad at Troy Industries for undermining your quest for compensation by calling out DSG for their poor pricing that "devalued and diluted Troy's brand".

 

[Pens1566]

Update... looks like media outlets are starting to pick up the story.

militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscout/2012/12/27/troy-issues-statement-on-dicks-sporting-goods/#more

Nothing major, but who knows what will happen. Many of the buyers disenfranchised over this are law enforcement officers as well. Even they are going to seek legal redress. Please I dare anyone in this thread to start laughing in the face of police officers going the same route I am.

They have the same lack of knowledge on civil cases as you do, so why wouldn't we mock them as well?

 

[Phoenix86]

Because I stated from the beginning how and why with links and explanations. Mental anguish, and if my lawyer agrees is feasible, would stem from the fact the product was a gift for the holiday season and may be the only time left ever in my lifetime to do so. By DSGs intentional actions, they have failed to let me have that moment in time that has forever passed me by. Much as the wedding dress scenario I posted in a previous link. There is a reasonable basis, but it may not be enough on it's own to be arguable in court.

Because it's the best home defense weapon there is? There has always been a questionable debate about whether a shotgun or AR15 is a better defensive weapon. The answer always breaks down into what a person shoots better. I have more experience shooting a rifle since that is what I've shot before in both civilian and military areas. I have used a shotgun once. The same goes for my family in what their experience with home defensive weapons are.

So the choice for me is clear for a home defensive item. The fact that you are trying to question my choice of home protection and making it off as something dismissive is quite irrational.

You just lost any mental anguish case you might have had.

 

[OutHouse]

*to seek legal redress. Please I dare anyone in this thread to start laughing in the face of police officers going the same route I am.__________________

Lol retard is a retard cop or not. I would laugh my ass off with gusto at any cop over this.

 

[HumblePie]

You just lost any mental anguish case you might have had.

lol how so?

 

[HumblePie]

Here is exactly what you typed "you ignoramus" (big words for such a mental midget).



Nowhere in the post did you mention that you are seeking your dipshit "mental anguish" punitive damages. Your post is there for all to read.

Again, you are not a man if you are still seeking money for "mental anguish". That is the mentality of an emotionally fragile, irrational woman. I'm glad I don't have to interact with people like you in my everyday life.

CorporateThug's post already showed that Dick's doesn't care about cancelled orders, just like Newegg. I can't wait until Dick's shoves your frivolous lawsuit back up your ass and makes you eat the court costs.

You still aren't making a point. I've stated multiple times that if I have to seek litigation I will do so seeking for the maximum I can. That includes damages, punitive, and mental anguish. Litigation is my last resort and I will do so with everything I possibly can. Your opinion on how I enact my litigation is pointless. Trying to insult me over it, or use meme generators to make you seem like a badass is trollish and childish.

As for CT's posts, he hasn't proven anything at all related to my case. He keeps bringing up scenario's where the buyer has to acknowledge additional terms to a sale contract before the purchase. Of which those terms have statements that allow for order cancellations. My purchase has nothing like that.

 

[Phoenix86]

lol how so?

Because it wasn't a gift it was for home defense. Your comparison to the wedding dress was extremely thin as it was and now it's just non-existent. There was no "event" you purchased this gun for.

 

[HumblePie]

Because it wasn't a gift it was for home defense. Your comparison to the wedding dress was extremely thin as it was and now it's just non-existent. There was no "event" you purchased this gun for.

I said it was a gift to my family. I stated they, like myself are accustomed more to rifles. I can also teach other family members on a rifle easier as I have prior knowledge of them. So how again does my admission of that ruin the possible claim basis?

Oh and my question you just answered was rhetorical. I knew what you were going to say in an answer because you thought you caught me in a "gotcha haha!" moment or something like that. I assure you that you did not. Just because I can use the firearm as well, doesn't mean it is any less of a gift to my family members.

 

[Lifted]

You still aren't making a point. I've stated multiple times that if I have to seek litigation I will do so seeking for the maximum I can. That includes damages, punitive, and mental anguish.

What I seek to gain is the item I paid $848 for. Nothing more and nothing less.

This thread delivers. :awe:

 

[HumblePie]

This thread delivers. :awe:

You still aren't "catching" me in contradictory statements like you seem to think you are. Your failure in reading comprehension is astounding though.

 

[SP33Demon]

I said it was a gift to my family. I stated they, like myself are accustomed more to rifles. I can also teach other family members on a rifle easier as I have prior knowledge of them. So how again does my admission of that ruin the possible claim basis?

Oh and my question you just answered was rhetorical. I knew what you were going to say in an answer because you thought you caught me in a "gotcha haha!" moment or something like that. I assure you that you did not. Just because I can use the firearm as well, doesn't mean it is any less of a gift to my family members.

Trust me, your posts are a gift for all of us to read.

 

[HumblePie]

Trust me, your posts are a gift for all of us to read.

Your quips and lame meme generators are still just so awesome! Not.

Really though I have to ask. What is your stake in all this? What is your angle? Why are you seem so desperately angry that I am seeking all possible legal avenues to resolve my situation? Really you seem mentally ill to be so obsessive about it that you resort to spending time on other websites to get crappy meme images to post in this thread. It's borderline OCD and you might want to seek professional help over it. I'm being quite serious.

 

[purbeast0]

Uh no. It's no different that if I bought gold at $50 an ounce from a supplier who failed to deliver as promised. If supplier was unwilling to deliver at $50 an ounce and current market value was no $100 an ounce, they would have to pay the difference in cost to deliver if I had to go elsewhere. Such cases have happened before and case law sides with me on this.

LOL ... yea, you buying a gun is no different than purchasing gold... rriigghhtt.

 

[HumblePie]

LOL ... yea, you buying a gun is no different than purchasing gold... rriigghhtt.

Seriously, why are you even in this thread except to troll? You offer no informative value to this thread. Like others, what is your problem with any person seeking perfect legal means of resolving issues they have with others?

The fact you keep posting like Sp33Demon the same tiresome argument without any merits really shows how deranged your mental capacity is. Perhaps you should seek co-counseling with him. Might go a long way to bettering your health. You might actually be able to make friends in real life instead wasting so much time pretending you know what you are talking about on a message board.

I'm being quite serious in that you really should spend some time reexamining your life and wondering why you would spend such an exorbitant amount of your time just trolling threads such as mine all day.