nextJin
Golden Member
- Apr 16, 2009
- 1,848
- 0
- 0
As a Paul supporter I can say without question he would not have won. At no point would any sort of establishment allowed it. You can call it what you want, it just wouldnt have happened. He had basically everyone against him and to get as far as he did speaks wonders.
Most of you ignorant Paul supporters needs to just stop posting, even if he had won he couldnt have fixed everything. I have already gone over what a Paul Presidency would have amounted too and it would be close to a Grover Cleveland legacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland
And it is absurd to say Romney did not want to win/run. He was running for 6 years and he had an official White House transition site setup that went live by mistake which imo is extremely embarrassing.
Most of you ignorant Paul supporters needs to just stop posting, even if he had won he couldnt have fixed everything. I have already gone over what a Paul Presidency would have amounted too and it would be close to a Grover Cleveland legacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland
And it is absurd to say Romney did not want to win/run. He was running for 6 years and he had an official White House transition site setup that went live by mistake which imo is extremely embarrassing.