- Aug 12, 2006
- 475
- 0
- 0
I'm 18 and just started to learn C++ . I feel old compared to others who have learned it at an earlier age.
Originally posted by: Cloud Strife
I'm 18 and just started to learn C++ . I feel old compared to others who have learned it at an earlier age.
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Cloud Strife
I'm 18 and just started to learn C++ . I feel old compared to others who have learned it at an earlier age.
BTW OP,
By the time you get out of school, C++ will not be used by most companies. Great language to learn because it covers everything, but now a lot of things are automated.
Unless you want to program for Google or Microsoft or IBM, chances are you will be doing Java or .NET.
Originally posted by: SurgicalShark
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Cloud Strife
I'm 18 and just started to learn C++ . I feel old compared to others who have learned it at an earlier age.
BTW OP,
By the time you get out of school, C++ will not be used by most companies. Great language to learn because it covers everything, but now a lot of things are automated.
Unless you want to program for Google or Microsoft or IBM, chances are you will be doing Java or .NET.
what...! I am flabbergasted by this statement.
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: SurgicalShark
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Cloud Strife
I'm 18 and just started to learn C++ . I feel old compared to others who have learned it at an earlier age.
BTW OP,
By the time you get out of school, C++ will not be used by most companies. Great language to learn because it covers everything, but now a lot of things are automated.
Unless you want to program for Google or Microsoft or IBM, chances are you will be doing Java or .NET.
what...! I am flabbergasted by this statement.
I have found that many mid-sized companies out there are switching over to .NET and Java.
Large tech corporations still have a large group of C++ programmers, but there is a growing push toward C# and Java, and the sad thing is many of these companies are starting to outsource, so what does it matter.
If you go into financial/oil institutions, you get an array of different programs from C++ to Legacy to Cobol, but again for many midsized companies C# and Java are completely just as capable of handling the workload.
Originally posted by: DT4K
That may be true for some types of development. Certainly, it is faster and easier to produce custom business apps in .Net and if you are talking about database-centric systems, the performance difference isn't really a factor. But IMO, C/C++ will still be in demand for a long time because it is a much better choice than .Net or Java for a lot of applications where execution time is critical or more direct lower level access to hardware is required.
Originally posted by: DaShen
I have found that many mid-sized companies out there are switching over to .NET and Java.
Large tech corporations still have a large group of C++ programmers, but there is a growing push toward C# and Java, and the sad thing is many of these companies are starting to outsource, so what does it matter.
If you go into financial/oil institutions, you get an array of different programs from C++ to Legacy to Cobol, but again for many midsized companies C# and Java are completely just as capable of handling the workload.
Originally posted by: SurgicalShark
Originally posted by: DaShen
I have found that many mid-sized companies out there are switching over to .NET and Java.
Large tech corporations still have a large group of C++ programmers, but there is a growing push toward C# and Java, and the sad thing is many of these companies are starting to outsource, so what does it matter.
If you go into financial/oil institutions, you get an array of different programs from C++ to Legacy to Cobol, but again for many midsized companies C# and Java are completely just as capable of handling the workload.
The speed offered by C/C++ can not be compared with any other programming language. Sure C# and Java are more business-centric but when it comes to developing robust applications which must be supported on wide variety of platforms, C/C++ remains language of choice. In my opinion, C/C++ will always remain as langauge for developing backend apps while other new languages will continue to emerge as we evolve around Web/Internet.
Originally posted by: Descartes
I learned Turbo Pascal 7 when I was about 12-13, QBasic around the same time, C about 2 years later, C++ when I was about 16, and VB4 when I was about 17. I started working professionally at 17 in Objective C and ASP (odd combination, I know). Throughout the years, C, C++ and VB had been my primary languages used. Since ~2001 it's been largely C#, VB.NET and still some C++.
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: Descartes
I learned Turbo Pascal 7 when I was about 12-13, QBasic around the same time, C about 2 years later, C++ when I was about 16, and VB4 when I was about 17. I started working professionally at 17 in Objective C and ASP (odd combination, I know). Throughout the years, C, C++ and VB had been my primary languages used. Since ~2001 it's been largely C#, VB.NET and still some C++.
QBasic! Do you remember Nibbles? :thumbsup: