Even if you could disable the slower .5gb segment you would not want to. It is slower than the 3.5gb portion, sure. But its still about 4 times faster than system ram so would do better with it than without it.
http://www.pcgamer.com/why-nvidias-gtx-970-slows-down-using-more-than-35gb-vram/
No reviewers have actually reproduced this. Only anecdotal 'evidence' from gamers who push the cards past what they're capable of even if it had the full 4gb vram.Trick is it slows down the other 3.5 GB, so there's some edge cases where it might not be worth it.
Trick is it slows down the other 3.5 GB
Does it really? How so?
The only issue I can see is if the card is telling the game "I have 4GB of VRAM" so the game balloons to use that for caching or something and hits the .5 piece when it otherwise wouldn't. From what I understand Nvidia goes out of its way in the driver to keep that from happening, which means the issue is mitigated.
With that said maybe being able to turn off the .5 piece will be helpful down the road when Maxwell is no longer Nvidia's priority and whatever team is today fixing the 970 in the driver has moved onto newer cards.
buddy have a 970 right now. need more gpu performance for wow's new ssaa. want to add another 970.
only if this 0.5gb of turtle vram could be disabled.