Pleas explain your refute??
1. Files are written all across the drive, these days. Windows has been using similar allocation techniques to *n*xes for years, now, resulting in reduced fragmentation, but also spreading data around. Even for bootup, it mostly relies on special bootup files, managed with ReadyBoot, pre-loading the hibernate file, and other little tricks.
2. Folders and files (but not their contents) are metadata, and may be in completely different locations (some definitely will be), relative to the files they relate to. They are trees, pointing to arbitrary lists of data offsets, with no particular location order relationships, unless managed by some 3rd-party defragger/optimizer. There is no linear space/location relationship.
3. The SSD's nature is, like an HDD, as a seekable block device, made up of 512B (usually) or 4KB blocks. How it reads or writes is largely irrelevant, and is completely hidden from the OS anyway. The drive has no concept of files, folders, or any other such things. It's got blocks and bytes, nothing more. How it does what it does doesn't matter.
4. Disabling indexes breaks no relationships. It just removes a lookup-optimized metadata cache from what the search function can utilize. It may not even slow down the search function. Windows 7 would automatically turn off indexing, if your SSD was fast enough, because they found the speed difference to be negligible in searching, while the overhead of maintaining the indexes was non-negligible. When it comes to file contents searching, though, the search will definitely be slower w/o indexing.
5.
So the RAM ruins sequential order between folders and their contents, as we access and modify files they travel back and forth between ssd and the RAM. That causes the broken sequential order of folders and their contents relationship.
That sort of order was never assured to exist in the first place, probably won't at all exist on a drive that's been in use for awhile, nor does it really matter. Files, and fragments of them, get scattered all about the drive, all the time, by design.
6.
What's more the only link between folders and their contents is windows OS and indexing.
No, it's not. The link between folders and their contents comes from the master file table or file allocation table, which are abstracted away from what's accessing them anyway, and unrelated to the search indexing functionality.
If you don't have indexing, ssd ignores folders and look for files individually at a search.
The search uses, and does
not ignore, folders, regardless of whether you have any indexing or not; and will look for files individually, or not, regardless of indexing.