It' a fashion issue, tough guys don't want to be seen in dorky hearing protection.
Obviously there's been a lot of discussion of bump fire stocks since the Vegas shooting, I've also read erroneous facts regarding suppressors aka silencers. Hillary stated how much worse Vegas would have been if he had silencers on the rifles, she waited a whole 2 hours into Monday morning to unleash this, ultra classy. I'm a firearms enthusiast and shoot a lot of sanctioned bullseye pistol matches, I'm not an expert on all things firearms but it drives me nuts to see false statements from people that have the supposed IQ to know better.
First off the average 5.56/.223rem shot from an AR15 is roughly 165db,,, VERY loud and painful if shot with no ear protection. WITH a suppressor the db level drops to a balmy 135db which is still still uncomfortable and damaging just not as bad as unsuppressed.
I've target shot long range several time with guys owning suppressed rifles, 243AI and 260 Remington to be exact, sitting next to them I still wore ear protection as it is still uncomfortable just not deafening as unsuppressed. This is why you hear about silencers being promoted for hunters. Hunters want their senses sharp to hear animals walking ect. but are then subjected to possibly damaging db levels from often large bore rifles.
Hollywood has done a lot to vilify the silencer often making the noise all but disappear in action scenes. In the case of 3000+ fps rifle cartridges this is false as I explained above, the noise is still loud to the point of being damaging. Fact is most high power rifles are mach 2-3, a large percentage of the report of a firearm comes from the miniature sonic boom of the projectile, the silencer only reduces the noise from gasses escaping the muzzle rapidly. The exception to this comes from subsonic ammunition such as 22lr. There are also some calibers such as 300blk which is a "wildcat" version of the 5.56/
223 that allows a 30 caliber bullet to be shot from a trimmed 5.56/.223 cartridge, there are special loadings (often hand loaded by enthusiasts) of 300blk with slow heavy bullets that remain subsonic, these get to Hollywood noise levels and are still quite deadly, YouTube should give you plenty of examples.
So there are the basic facts, yes a pistol or rifle with silencer can achieve Hollywood quite levels but the majority aren't. People buy them for novelty, hearing protection and in long range shooting there is evidence that they increase accuracy due to less turbulence while the bullet exits the barrel. As with anything they can be used by criminals to pull off mafia style hits, fact is they aren't 99.9999% of the time hence the push by some to lift the NFA regulations on them.
Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
Also genius silencers already are legal but regulated under NFA so there is a bunch of red tape, $200 fee and roughly 6 months of waiting to get one.You should watch the video so you can know what it will be like for your future victims when you get silencers legalized and you can put one on your bump-stocked AR15 w/ extended magazine. I posted it above for you.
You are definitely right that you can hear the shots. They don't sound like normal gunshots, but that's the point, right? Right.
does that offend baby?
tell it to the dead you fuckwit.
Well I agree with your post in that I think everyone who buys a handgun or non-hunting rifle should get a silencer too.
I would just point out that the "point" of a silencer is not to make the report "silent" or to protect your ears, it is to mask the sound of the gunshot as something else. If you'd like, I can post a video that shows this... there is a video of IRCG (Iran Revolutionary Guard Quds Force) using silencers while attacking an Iraqi militia. From the perspective of the militia, you cannot tell that they are gunshots at all. It totally makes the report unrecognizable (and thus, stealth).
That is the "point" of a silencer. Not to protect your ears.
Otherwise, great post!
LOL, snowflakes. Buy some earplugs, idiot.
https://youtu.be/bTJKBhWHHu8?t=134wait! a suppressor wont make a 50bmg quieter than a gnat fart?
hollywood has been lying?
recoil reduction and accuracy. Virtually every hunter I know uses suppression.So what does a silencer give you that ear plugs won't??
Also hearing your surroundings better. Yes you can use electronic muffs but then you're stuck wearing muffs for hours.So what does a silencer give you that ear plugs won't??
recoil reduction and accuracy. Virtually every hunter I know uses suppression.
Also hearing your surroundings better. Yes you can use electronic muffs but then you're stuck wearing muffs for hours.
Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
It would seem that silencers are the least of America's problems when it comes to firearms.
Sure, but imagine if the LV shooter had had a silencer, how much longer could he have kept up firing without the crowd dispersing the area?
The question is, why would it be needed for anyone? The answer is, it's not.
they why are they so easy to get in the uk?
Honestly, I don't think he would have been shooting any longer. The reason someone would need one is to protect hearing, decrease noise pollution, basically the same reasons we try to make things like cars quieter.Sure, but imagine if the LV shooter had had a silencer, how much longer could he have kept up firing without the crowd dispersing the area?
The question is, why would it be needed for anyone? The answer is, it's not.
Honestly, I don't think he would have been shooting any longer. The reason someone would need one is to protect hearing, decrease noise pollution, basically the same reasons we try to make things like cars quieter.