- Oct 1, 2007
- 72
- 0
- 61
Okay, I'm really new to the whole DNC and how it works. I've been reading up and found some info here and there. I think I basically get the concept, but the H. Clinton thing(I'll explain) is what confuses me.
Was it the DNC's position and by agreement of the candidates that delegates/superdelegates would be the determining factor? From what I understand the answer is yes. Did all candidates involved originally agree to this by virtue of being a member running for candidacy via the DNC?
There are only 100ish delegates/superdelegates left. H. Clinton needs 200ish to win? How is it possible for her to win when there aren't sufficient votes left?
Why was popular vote ever discussed as a means for H. Clinton to win? Is the DNC able to decide either way by popular vote or delegate/superdelegates?
Was it the DNC's position and by agreement of the candidates that delegates/superdelegates would be the determining factor? From what I understand the answer is yes. Did all candidates involved originally agree to this by virtue of being a member running for candidacy via the DNC?
There are only 100ish delegates/superdelegates left. H. Clinton needs 200ish to win? How is it possible for her to win when there aren't sufficient votes left?
Why was popular vote ever discussed as a means for H. Clinton to win? Is the DNC able to decide either way by popular vote or delegate/superdelegates?