My point is that your statement is exactly what one would say if what you have seen are the many opinions the blind have of what an elephant is. The logical conclusion is that people see what they want to see or interpret. But the whole point of this elephant analogy relies on the implication there is a real elephant.
Similarly, we know that Pastafarians ridicule the notion of God by implying that God is a noodle, but this notion has never sprung up independently over thousands of years as a transcendental experience that some people attain because there's no intuitive sense to it. It has no appeal or unconscious attraction to the mind other than satire.
The idea of God or of a transcendental state symbolized by that idea has and always will survive, I suggest, because such a thing like an elephant is real. People will always have the experience of waking up from a dream, of discovering a truth that is deeper, truer, and more profound than any other, one that in my opinion involves the collapse of duality and the death of the ego followed by the experience of the oneness of love. And I believe, also, as you might easily guess, that it is our self hate, the feeling that we don't deserve such a thing that creates the motivation to believe that it can't exist. We were separated from oneness of God by having been made to feel we are undeserving so we deny to avoid that feeling. But for some the will to know or the pain is too great to allow the person to hide.