- Mar 25, 2001
- 19,275
- 1,361
- 126
It's been pointed out repeatedly. You won't acknowledge it. You won't own it. You won't take the opportunity to grow.How so
I'm going to repost this because apparently it was overlooked and people keep making the same failed arguments.
And to end this fucking nonsense once and for all:
There is no such thing as reverse racism. Frustration and resentment is not racism.
Were this a class war, you would most certainly not call the underclasses "classist" or "elitist" for resenting and being frustrated with the upper classes.
Are the untouchables in India "classist?"
So why do you do so with race? To excuse your own feelings. To accuse those who are angry with whites as a group for years of oppression of the very thing you've done to them all along.
Calling the oppressed group "classist," "sexist," or "racist" is merely projection and a convenient form of denial. An excuse to continue the very behavior that got us here.
for the second time i nthis thread, you have peddled this bullshit, and the for the second time, you are DEAD ASS WRONG.
Racism isnt some implied nebulus tendency principal of which all white people are responsible for and all black people are the receiver for. Racism requires a very specific intentional hostile action between 2 specific parties, where 1 wrongs the other because of his race. The vast majority of blacks have never experienced a physical specific tangible act of racism. The vast majority of whites have never committed a hostile act against a black person. Racism cant exist unless racist people do.
If you resent some or all white people for what some OTHER white person has done to you, thats racist. If you resent some or all white because of what some other white did to some other black, you are perpetuating racism. Demanding reparations for what some white person did to some other black person in the past whom is not you... is racism.
for the second time i nthis thread, you have peddled this bullshit, and the for the second time, you are DEAD ASS WRONG.
Racism isnt some implied nebulus tendency principal of which all white people are responsible for and all black people are the receiver for. Racism requires a very specific intentional hostile action between 2 specific parties, where 1 wrongs the other because of his race. The vast majority of blacks have never experienced a physical specific tangible act of racism. The vast majority of whites have never committed a hostile act against a black person. Racism cant exist unless racist people do.
If you resent some or all white people for what some OTHER white person has done to you, thats racist. If you resent some or all white because of what some other white did to some other black, you are perpetuating racism. Demanding reparations for what some white person did to some other black person in the past whom is not you... is racism.
I'm sorry reality and the english language does not line up with your own personal biases.
rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun
- prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
Just like classism, racism cannot exist from the oppressed party.
The only bullshit here is your refusal to accept the definition of racism.
By your logic, resentment among the untouchables in India is "Classism" Even though their feelings are the exact opposite of that word.
Nope, sorry but just no. Without a belief in one's own racial superiority, racial prejudice does not cross the line into racism.
Oh, and the real bullshit here is you thinking to speak for the majority of black people's experiences. Just wow.
This poll asked people if they had been treated unfairly in a restaurant based on their race in the past month:
Past month.
Tell us more about the experiences of the majority of black people.
Please.
Wow. All that to completely fail to change the definition of racism.
Nice.
Fucking idiot. So fixated on labeling the victims of generational, institutionalized systemic racism as racist so you can justify your own bias.
for the second time i nthis thread, you have peddled this bullshit, and the for the second time, you are DEAD ASS WRONG.
Racism isnt some implied nebulus tendency principal of which all white people are responsible for and all black people are the receiver for. Racism requires a very specific intentional hostile action between 2 specific parties, where 1 wrongs the other because of his race. The vast majority of blacks have never experienced a physical specific tangible act of racism. The vast majority of whites have never committed a hostile act against a black person. Racism cant exist unless racist people do.
If you resent some or all white people for what some OTHER white person has done to you, thats racist. If you resent some or all white because of what some other white did to some other black, you are perpetuating racism. Demanding reparations for what some white person did to some other black person in the past whom is not you... is racism.
lol.. noI can start one of why black people recieve much harsher sentencing than white people for similar crimes if you’d like me to. Or the drug war and how we treat different drug crimes differently depending on who uses it. Or why the black community is policed much more heavily than the white community.
Like I’ve said before the “concern” response is a sign of someone who has nothing to say. No input into the conversation or more than likely they don’t want to agree with someone for partisan reasons, so the default response regurgitated is “concern”.
for the second time i nthis thread, you have peddled this bullshit, and the for the second time, you are DEAD ASS WRONG.
Racism isnt some implied nebulus tendency principal of which all white people are responsible for and all black people are the receiver for. Racism requires a very specific intentional hostile action between 2 specific parties, where 1 wrongs the other because of his race. The vast majority of blacks have never experienced a physical specific tangible act of racism. The vast majority of whites have never committed a hostile act against a black person. Racism cant exist unless racist people do.
If you resent some or all white people for what some OTHER white person has done to you, thats racist. If you resent some or all white because of what some other white did to some other black, you are perpetuating racism. Demanding reparations for what some white person did to some other black person in the past whom is not you... is racism.
lol.. no
your concern trolling is patently transparent, and not worthy of a reasonable discussion or dialogue. Your posting history belies your façade
I'll assume his dad sent him a FW:FW:fw:FW:fw:fw:fw:Has anyone found where this image originated?
Seems to be very popular on the right wing idiot sites.
Wonder how OP came across this image?
No.
Racism is racial prejudice BASED ON THE BELIEF OF INHERENT RACIAL SUPERIORITY.
So you don't think the headline "White men must be stopped" is alleging something inherently deficient in white people?
I can answer. No, it is not.Will you answer?
I can answer. No, it is not.
EDIT: And if you think so, you are stupid and probably desperate to be a victim. Which aligns nicely with your desire to oppress women while also crying victim over your religious beliefs.
Blessed be the word.
Can a non-jackass answer? Preferably Amused?
Will you answer?
The headline "white men must be stopped" is not a rascist statement in and of itself. I'd have to read the article for context.
I said earlier in the thread, head lines are intended to grab attention, apparently it's working. I still read articles to see context before I pass my own judgement. Even at sites like Breitbart and Fox news.You don't think such a headline alleges a problem inherent to white men, such that they "must be stopped"?
You may find this surprising but the entities that fostered or allowed most of the racist policies was the local, state and federal governments who were supposed to treat all people as equal under the law.
For blacks, government screwed them over to varying degrees
While the white people who did many of these things are dead or no longer in power the organizations they represented are. The aforementioned local, state and federal governments who failed to live up to ‘equal under the law’.
- During slavery
- During reconstruction
- During Jim Crow
- During the fight for civil rights
- Even up to now (un equal policing, sentencing, etc)
Now you may find this surprising but in this country we are allowed to ‘petition the government for redress of grievances’. It’s one of the reasons we no longer have a king and a reason why liberals still don’t want a king.
Now I don’t know what the appropriate redress is for the citizens affected by the governmenta racists policies but I do know the first step is to have the government stop formenting racist policies .
I can answer. No, it is not.
EDIT: And if you think so, you are stupid and probably desperate to be a victim. Which aligns nicely with your desire to oppress women while also crying victim over your religious beliefs.
Blessed be the word.