BD231
Lifer
- Feb 26, 2001
- 10,568
- 138
- 106
Gordon Freemen
thanks god .... i forgot that link ^^ i mean thank you
yeah dude ... BF3 is GPU intensive .. not cpu ... 4 core cpus will do fine ... just need grat gpu for that ....
cmdrdredd
okay i got 590 right ? i got 52-55 dips only with gtx 590 .... i said ... my friend tested it on own i7 2600 4.4GHZ .... same results ....
okay leave it .... all you think that i lie ... no problem ... serius ....
that topic is about GPU .... not cpu ... i will upgrade cpu if you will be right .... thats all ....
Exactly. Doesn't matter how much current power you throw at BF3 cpu or gpu alike, BF3 is coded to run a majority of it's CPU intensive tasks on 2 cores and with the amount of physics calculations/multiple players going on in that game coding is the bottleneck. Never mind the game runs smooth as glass even when you get the dips though right? We should be thankful frostbite developers had the sense of mind to keep us around 60.
What we need is for developers to put the extra cores to use properly so people will shut up about hardware limitations that don't exist. By the time a CPU comes out that's twice as fast none of us will be playing BF3, the only real fix to that is better use of available hardware. Thankfully there's massive room for improvement, we just have to wait until they start fully utilizing current hardware.