Does the national debt worry you?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
Yes it worries me. Only thing more troubling than it is climate change. At least one political party seems to care about the environment (sort of), no one in DC cares about the debt.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,852
136
Yes it worries me. Only thing more troubling than it is climate change. At least one political party seems to care about the environment (sort of), no one in DC cares about the debt.
That's because the debt has never affected anyone, anywhere, except the people who use the big bad debt as investment - in which case they profit.

All the debt is, is an accounting of how much currency has been injected into the economy. The economy only works if the people who live in it have access to it.

The problem isn't the number, but how that number got to where it is, and who gets to take part in the economy, and who has to live on the outside of it because of how it's been allocated.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Insufficient revenue isn't the problem. When the government makes any attempt at all to bring its spending habits into accordance with its revenue, I'll listen to plans for tax increases.

If all the government is gonna do is go to China or whoever else to get deeper into debt, I'd prefer the taxpayers keep as much of their income as possible. Lord knows they'll spend it more wisely than DC would.

Just for you-


The reason the govt is "going to China or whoever else to get deeper into debt" is so that the GOP can give massive tax cuts to corporations & people who don't need tax cuts in the first place. Singing your little song & voting for them is contradictory on its face.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,007
572
126
That's because the debt has never affected anyone, anywhere, except the people who use the big bad debt as investment - in which case they profit.

All the debt is, is an accounting of how much currency has been injected into the economy. The economy only works if the people who live in it have access to it.

The problem isn't the number, but how that number got to where it is, and who gets to take part in the economy, and who has to live on the outside of it because of how it's been allocated.

Then why is it called a debt?
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,852
136
Then why is it called a debt?
It's called a "debt" because rather than the US government printing cash and spending it, as it very well could, it instead has the Federal Reserve Bank issue Treasury Bonds (debt) that people can purchase as investment because the bonds (debt) pays out interest on the initial base bond value. This system has a vested interest (pun intended) to keep interest rates in check.

I got a laugh emoji, instead of a response to what I said that you quoted, because the emoji-givers cognitive dissonance was cracked.

Since you're actually able to respond with words, let me ask you.

How as the deficit, or US Debt, ever affected you, or anyone on the planet? Please, no slippery-slope arguments about how it could affect you or anyone else if only X, Y, and Z happen.

How has it ever affected you or anyone else, ever?
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,007
572
126
It's called a "debt" because rather than the US government printing cash and spending it, as it very well could, it instead has the Federal Reserve Bank issue Treasury Bonds (debt) that people can purchase as investment because the bonds (debt) pays out interest on the initial base bond value. This system has a vested interest (pun intended) to keep interest rates in check.

So does the money have to be paid back or not?

I got a laugh emoji, instead of a response to what I said that you quoted, because the emoji-givers cognitive dissonance was cracked.

Since you're actually able to respond with words, let me ask you.

Hey look, an asshole on the internet. Such a rarity.

How as the deficit, or US Debt, ever affected you, or anyone on the planet? Please, no slippery-slope arguments about how it could affect you or anyone else if only X, Y, and Z happen.

How has it ever affected you or anyone else, ever?

It hasn't affected me, at least not in any way that I can recognize. But that's beside the point. Changes to the medicare system don't immediately affect me either, but it may some time in the future if its problems are left unaddressed.

If the national debt were to triple, or quadruple, or increase by just about any multiple, what would be the effect on the average citizen? Can it rise from 100% to 600 or 700% of GDP without any ill effect? Is it truly meaningless how high it goes?

I'm not an economist and don't pretend to know. But progressives seem to believe that it's wholly unimportant.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
So does the money have to be paid back or not?

No. It has to be rolled over into new bonds while inflation eats away at its value. They're the world's safest place to park money so the return is low. Bond holders often offer them as collateral to borrow.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,596
7,852
136
So does the money have to be paid back or not?



Hey look, an asshole on the internet. Such a rarity.



It hasn't affected me, at least not in any way that I can recognize. But that's beside the point. Changes to the medicare system don't immediately affect me either, but it may some time in the future if its problems are left unaddressed.

If the national debt were to triple, or quadruple, or increase by just about any multiple, what would be the effect on the average citizen? Can it rise from 100% to 600 or 700% of GDP without any ill effect? Is it truly meaningless how high it goes?

I'm not an economist and don't pretend to know. But progressives seem to believe that it's wholly unimportant.
No strawmen here. I have not said that the debt can be increased to any percentage of GDP and it not matter. I even stated in my first post that I am not arguing for some $10T helicopter dump of cash.

But, to answer your question:

1. Yes, the debt has to be paid back. It does not require more debt to be created to do it, and it does not require the government to increase taxes on anyone, although taxes should be increased on the richest, because at the rate of their current taxation, they'll be buying the government for spare parts soon. A feature, and not a bug, of continued tax cuts for the richest people in the solar system.

2. The size of the debt only matters if it continues growing without it benefiting most of the participants of the economy. If the value created from the debt continues being forefully shoved into the pockets of the people who already have all the money, then the debt shouldn't worry you - the aristocracy that the current oligarchs crave and will create should...unless you're rich and an oligarch looking to be the founding member of the impending aristocracy (anyone with a net worth under $20M, or lacking liquidity of $10M, is not rich, btw).

I'm not arguing that the debt can go up to $100T and it not cause interest rates to increases - because of how our current system works. But, the government could spend cash without creating debt first, using it on infrastructure to make our country the most advanced nation on earth (called investing in your country's future, the highest form of patriotism) which would stimulate the economy and allow people to touch some money before it, as always, ends up in the hands of corporations and the banks.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,726
2,501
126
The fact that this administration is rapidly escalating the national debt for absolutely no valid reason (other than to give fat cats a bigger break) worries me a lot. It seems to be a very poor return for mortgaging our future so heavily.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Being worried about the national debt is like being worried about the surveillance state. It doesn’t really matter for a shit if you are or not as it ain’t changing. The rabid partisans don’t care enough to change their votes about it so we can all just go on down the road to mutually assured destruction together. And since neither side is fixing it then I’d rather my side be the one looting the treasury in pursuit of our own interests. A tax cut for me vs. money for the poors to waste is a no brainer.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,846
13,778
146
If all the government is gonna do is go to China or whoever else to get deeper into debt, I'd prefer the taxpayers keep as much of their income as possible. Lord knows they'll spend it more wisely than DC would.

No one likes paying taxes but most want what those taxes buy. The richest especially.

But you’re concerned about spending. Maybe it’s time to cut off the Uncle Sam tap to taker states. They should be able to make do without it and as you said they’ll spend it wisely.




Obviously rural areas do not need federal help if they can afford jacked up bass boats and arsenals.

I'm not an economist and don't pretend to know. But progressives seem to believe that it's wholly unimportant.

I don’t expect this to change your mind but the rate of debt increase slows under democratic presidents and increases under republicans.

After all:
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,579
1,629
136
The top tax rate was 91% when Kennedy gave his speech on going to the moon and it was 71% when Apollo 11 launched. Now conservatives say that our government can't afford to do anything and argue that we need to cut government spending to fix the problem. Oh, and more tax cuts! No, we need to raise our tax rates and mostly on the top earners. Somehow, way back when, people were able to survive the horrors of higher tax rates and live to complain about it. High tax rates kept executives from draining a company and pocketing it, instead they would pay themselves modest salaries and invest the rest back in to the company though expansion, hiring, better wages and benefits and so on. Low rates led to the siphoning off the assets into the pockets of the executives and shareholders, with most of the latter being held by the wealthy. Conservatives praise St. Reagan for leading the way, but he couldn't have done it without conservative Democrats and Republicans. Some would call both parties voting to drop taxes as bipartisan but it's not, it's as partisan as fuck.

Want better pay and benefits? Close executive pay loopholes so everything is taxed, raise the top rates and see what happens.
 

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,271
323
126
The national debt doesn't scare me because the majority of the U.S national debt is a war debt that's a consequence of being the world's superpower. We've spent roughly 20 trillion on wars over the last century. Take that out of the equation and we barely owe anything on the national debt.

Once we lose the reserve currrency status we won't be able to afford these wars and hence the debt will start to go down. We spend hardly anything on social services in this country compared to say, the next 20 countries ahead of us, so the chance of running into a financial catastrophe due to non-war related spending is pretty minor.
 

ralfy

Senior member
Jul 22, 2013
485
53
91
The national debt doesn't scare me because the majority of the U.S national debt is a war debt that's a consequence of being the world's superpower. We've spent roughly 20 trillion on wars over the last century. Take that out of the equation and we barely owe anything on the national debt.

Once we lose the reserve currrency status we won't be able to afford these wars and hence the debt will start to go down. We spend hardly anything on social services in this country compared to say, the next 20 countries ahead of us, so the chance of running into a financial catastrophe due to non-war related spending is pretty minor.

Without that petrodollar propped up, many more things start falling apart.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
Vastly larger? Not likely, especially when the economy is essentially driven by consumer spending and debt.

So to be clear you’re predicting a sustained slowdown or contraction in US GDP? When will this take place and to what extent?

Just looking for ballpark figures.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Eventually, the fed will monetize it. It's basically theft from average person through eventual inflation to give money to the rich. But since the average person also voted for politicians doing it, I don't feel bad for most of them.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
The highest taxed are the people who work for a living. The poor don't pay taxes, and the wealthy find loopholes, or they put their wealth into tax exempt things like real estate. It's always the middle class who picks up the tax burden.

You could tax all sources. Would never be law though. The wealthy will make sure of that. When I taught in Asia the one huge benefit to me was I paid ZERO federal taxes. That's 22-30% on $52k. Tax free. It's why people were running oil trucks in Iraq for $100k a year. A very dangerous job, but the tax exemptions are amazing. That's extra money that you can invest, etc.

The wealthy are always going to rule America. If you can play their game on a smaller scale, I think that's the only way. Complaining about it isn't going to do anything. Just my opinion.

Taxation is possible. AOC is IMO very generous. What we need is a wealth tax in addition to a very high income tax above the 10 mil mark. Now if these guys want to move to China? Don't let the door hit you in the ass, but they should be sanctioned in business dealings and their companies. I bet the shareholders at that point would stick them in Antartica in the middle of the worst winter weather before that. Dems could do such a thing but yes, "both sides". The younger politicians might do something before they become corrupt which would be nice.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
Oh, I don't give a crap about any of this debt stuff since we're really working hard to kill ourselves, literally. That would be a great joke, hundreds of trillions owed and everyone baked. There's sticking someone with the bill! Well if there's anyone left.
 

ralfy

Senior member
Jul 22, 2013
485
53
91
So to be clear you’re predicting a sustained slowdown or contraction in US GDP? When will this take place and to what extent?

Just looking for ballpark figures.

From what I know, the sustained slowdown started a decade ago. They've been creating more credit to deal with that, but the debt levels are too high.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
In just eight years Obama took the debt from around $10 trillion and doubled it to about $20 trillion when he left office. About as much debt racked up by all prior admins combined there. We're still standing.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
From what I know, the sustained slowdown started a decade ago. They've been creating more credit to deal with that, but the debt levels are too high.

Slowdown in what way? Per capita GDP growth? What’s the evidence for that?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Yes. They all spent too much, both sides got us into this situation. It is good to see the Democrats and Republicans can come together when it comes to kicking the can down the road.

Or maybe the GOP wastes too much on fruitless wars & tax cuts.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |