I’m sure he could for federal taxes or at least do it and leave future legislators to figure out if they want to ignore the pardon.
Doubt it, and dont think he can.
But I thought that there was nothing to see here. Now there is? Imagine that!
Next thing we know there will be (imagine the unimaginable) investigations into Hunter Biden and Burisma.
Amazing how you suddenly have concern about tax dodging.
For the record I am all for a prompt and efficient investigation.
Can you say the same thing for the Trump family?
Oh but they did. The Democratic Party's Long Shift To The Left On Immigration : NPR
1. For one, Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas has called for it.
2. I have no idea.
3. I have no idea, and dont care.
What do your questions have to do with Hunter?
All the usual suspects in here have been claiming for well over a year that there was nothing to see here and no investigation needed. In fact any investigation into the Hunter Biden story was just insane conspiracy theory run wild that only tin hat freakazoids would pursue. Now all the sudden it's "we need to investigate the Trumps because the Biden's are crooks!" . Yep makes sense.Amazing how you suddenly have concern about tax dodging.
For the record I am all for a prompt and efficient investigation.
Can you say the same thing for the Trump family?
kevin brady isn't a state rep.Republican STATE representative?
Sorry, as of now Donald Trump is the President, I will grant you that Uncle Joe Biden is the President-elect.If he is guilty of tax fraud he should pay the penalty. Doesn't matter who he is.
Hunter isn't president, and Joe Biden is, and he has released 20 years of his returns. That is what matters in regards to running this country.
I think it happens because of the same reason #bothsides switch opinions depending on political climate. Take a look at Democrats quotes on illegal immigration and policy during the Obama years vs now. They switched sides.
tl:dr its politics
My apologies, you are correct. Upon closer inspection though Kevin Brady argues AGAINST Trump’s tax returns being released.kevin brady isn't a state rep.
You did not read your own link, haha. They were referring on the shift for Democrats from the 90’s to Obama, not from Obama to Trump. If anything it shows that the shift accelerated during the Obama years and continued under Trump.
You just disproved your own point.
1) LOL a Republican STATE representative? That’s your example? Again, thanks for proving my point, haha.
As for 2 and 3 great, they don’t exist. Once again pricing my point. It’s not caused by politics, it’s caused by Republicans not giving a shit about corruption and only pretending to.
What this has to do with Hunter Biden is when it came to Trump’s tax fraud your response was to cast doubt on there being anything worthy to investigate.
Who has switched opinions here you little bitch?
Democrats you little wise and beautiful woman.
edit: interesting correction now lol
Now all the sudden it's "we need to investigate the Trumps because the Biden's are crooks!" . Yep makes sense.
Such a lying sack of shit. Shut the fuck up, clown.But I thought that there was nothing to see here. Now there is? Imagine that!
Wtf are you talking about? Can you be just slightly honest for once in your pathetic life?
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.I am still glad that I didn't vote for Hunter Biden!
Read my links cnt
I did. I love these gems: (since you didnt read them)Try reading your own links, kunt
Today, little of that ambivalence remains. In 2008, the Democratic platform called undocumented immigrants “our neighbors.” But it also warned, “We cannot continue to allow people to enter the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked,” adding that “those who enter our country’s borders illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of the law.” By 2016, such language was gone. The party’s platform described America’s immigration system as a problem, but not illegal immigration itself. And it focused almost entirely on the forms of immigration enforcement that Democrats opposed. In its immigration section, the 2008 platform referred three times to people entering the country “illegally.” The immigration section of the 2016 platform didn’t use the word illegal, or any variation of it, at all.
A larger explanation is political. Between 2008 and 2016, Democrats became more and more confident that the country’s growing Latino population gave the party an electoral edge. To win the presidency, Democrats convinced themselves, they didn’t need to reassure white people skeptical of immigration so long as they turned out their Latino base. “The fastest-growing sector of the American electorate stampeded toward the Democrats this November,” Salon declared after Obama’s 2008 win. “If that pattern continues, the GOP is doomed to 40 years of wandering in a desert.”
But has the claim that “immigrants coming to the U.S. are taking jobs” actually been proved “incorrect”? A decade ago, liberals weren’t so sure. In 2006, Krugman wrote that America was experiencing “large increases in the number of low-skill workers relative to other inputs into production, so it’s inevitable that this means a fall in wages.”
It’s hard to imagine a prominent liberal columnist writing that sentence today.
Well the first problem that stands out to me there is they quote Paul Krugman and...
What does your link have to do with the thread and the topic? Again, you are a complete piece of shit incapable of having an honest discussion. For four years we’ve watched you hand wave actual verified claims of corruption and you have the gall to start complaining about everything now? Do you know how big of a hypocritical piece of shit that makes you?
Go read your posts from the last four years and come back with a straight face and tell us why anyone should listen to a single thing you say.
You claim you read them but your quoted passage explicitly disproves your argument that the shift came as a difference from Obama to Trump.I did. I love these gems: (since you didnt read them)
So yeah. For politics.
So yeah. I read them, you didnt.
Well the first problem that stands out to me there is they quote Paul Krugman and...
1) it’s from 2006 so not Obama/Trump.
2) he got significant pushback from liberals on the issue in 2006, meaning they didn’t change either.
3) Krugman’s views on immigration have not substantially changed and he’s still a liberal in good standing.
Seriously, stop digging. This is silliness. The claim that you made about Democrats switching their opinions on immigration because of Trump is simply false. The change started well before him.
You claim you read them but your quoted passage explicitly disproves your argument that the shift came as a difference from Obama to Trump.