I don't think she is shot as a witness AND if she reported the inability to access and correct transscripts within the 30 day window; i would expect the judge to censor the lawyers and him to look into disbarment.
Yes but if she has recordings to support her testimony as someone on the jury who would you believe ?I wouldn't put her on the stand to contradict testimony she gave in another lawsuit, then explain that she was coerced and couldn't correct it. I know how I'd handle that if I was a Fox lawyer. I'd say she's angry at Fox News is thus changing her testimony and blaming Fox. I'd get her to admit she perjured herself. All those arguments can be countered but it's better not to have that kind of baggage with a witness.
Yes but if she has recordings to support her testimony as someone on the jury who would you believe ?
This is what did it. Reveals that Tucker is an unbalanced racist, white supremacist.I don't buy that.
I think we need more evidence to prove racism. Maybe Tucker was just being an asshole.This is what did it. Reveals that Tucker is an unbalanced racist, white supremacist.
NYT reveals Tucker text message that “set off a panic" at Fox News
Carlson discussed Antifa murder fantasy and "how white men fight" in text that prompted internal Fox investigation.www.salon.com
Still need PROOF! That’s just speculation, taken out of context, and oh, look…squirrel!Nah that is kkk shit right there.
I'm playing the role of someone who will never be convinced.Nah that is kkk shit right there.
Fox News will pay $12 million to settle a pair of major lawsuits brought by former producer Abby Grossberg, her lawyer said Friday.
Grossberg had accused Fox News of pressuring her into giving false testimony in Dominion Voting Systems’ historic defamation case against the network, and of fostering a deeply misogynist workplace. She had sued Fox News, its parent company, former primetime host Tucker Carlson and several senior executives.
That's not an AG that's a law-firm (on behalf of shareholders); that sort of stuff is common - basically shitty legal firms looking to make a buck. In the end the shareholds get pennies on the $$$ while the law-firm get $$$.Updates on Smartmatic/Fox lawsuit may be sparse, looks like discovery doesn't conclude until December this year. Separate cases on Dominion vs. OANN and Newsmax also aren't going fast, with 2024 earliest likely trial dates. (OANN not yet scheduled as far as I can see, Newsmax tentatively proposed for Sept 2024)
On the Fox front, nothing definitive yet, but at least one AG was looking into Fox for breach in fiduciary duty to shareholders over election lies (this is from June 6):
Fox shareholder Oregon investigating board of directors
To see if board failed its fiduciary duties by allowing Fox News to broadcast false 2020 election claims.fortune.com
I don't disagree about such shady law firms that basically sue over any stock price drop , but this actually is the state AG:That's not an AG that's a law-firm (on behalf of shareholders); that sort of stuff is common - basically shitty legal firms looking to make a buck. In the end the shareholds get pennies on the $$$ while the law-firm get $$$.
-
god i hate these types of lawyers - they have the ethics of a slug.
Yea sorry about that - just read the headline which was mis-leading (i think); unless she is investigating as a private citizen and shareholder - or maybe the state of oregon had shares so that is what triggered it.I don't disagree about such shady law firms that basically sue over any stock price drop , but this actually is the state AG:
...
Oregon’s attorney general announced Monday she has begun investigating the board of directors of Fox Corp. for breaching its fiduciary duties by allowing Fox News to broadcast false claims about the 2020 presidential election — claims that cost the broadcaster almost $800 million in a lawsuit.
Also joining the investigation is Oregon State Treasurer Tobias Read, who oversees the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund, which owns more than 250,000 shares of Fox stock.
“Treasurer Read and I believe that Fox’s board of directors breached its fiduciary duties by allowing Fox News to broadcast false claims that Dominion and Smartmatic rigged the 2020 presidential election,” Rosenblum said. “We hope to hold the board accountable and protect the long-term value of Oregon’s investment in Fox Corp."
He does, about 4 minutes in his dumbass cant contain his dumb.Rogan does a smart thing and doesn’t name Epps. Likely gives him cover
This is what did it. Reveals that Tucker is an unbalanced racist, white supremacist.
NYT reveals Tucker text message that “set off a panic" at Fox News
Carlson discussed Antifa murder fantasy and "how white men fight" in text that prompted internal Fox investigation.www.salon.com
But...but...we are told just stop talking about racism and it goes away.Wasn't the "racist" bit obvious some time ago?
I don't think the casually-thrown-in racist comment in that Tucker quote is that remarkable TBH (ie. a bit of a "water is wet" statement about bigots), or the likely toxic masculinity (Trump *guys*, Antifa *kid*), I'm vaguely curious about how the "Antifa kid" is identified as such; is Tucker just labelling anyone who "isn't Trump" as "Antifa", but the bit that interests me is that it's almost as his conscience is prickling him yet the "bothsides" has a deeper root than whatever hole his conscience has been quietly dying in.
IMO Tucker went off the deep end some time ago, but this quote suggests that either he was in danger of turning a positive corner with his bigotry (highly unlikely, but still), or there's an even deeper end that he's in danger of going in to. Either possibility would concern Fox IMO: the possibility that one of the right's most bigoted and influential figures might turn away from the right and the power that would have in their spectrum, or the possibility that Fox was employing someone who's soon to have a psychotic break or about to be at the head of a (likely violent) far-right group that even Fox considers to be heavily damaging to their ideals.