Just a reminder the tagline for his show was “the no-spin zone”. In light of recent court filings, I think we can all agree that was just utter bullshit.
Bill O'Reilly was just on Chris Cuomo's show on Newsnation this past week attesting this is still a fact.
Just a reminder the tagline for his show was “the no-spin zone”. In light of recent court filings, I think we can all agree that was just utter bullshit.
Soon everyone will be coming for their pound of flesh. Wonder how much Hunter Biden can get out of them.Someone posted Smartmatic is a separate suit.
I hope the capital police sue them next. Fox can’t fend off everyone and I suspect the police won’t just settle for a small payoff
If Hunter can show no evidence, he was orchestrating payoffs for Joe Biden, he can sue them as well. Hunter is and always was a private citizen.Soon everyone will be coming for their pound of flesh. Wonder how much Hunter Biden can get out of them.
Just a reminder the tagline for his show was “the no-spin zone”. In light of recent court filings, I think we can all agree that was just utter bullshit.
Someone posted Smartmatic is a separate suit.
I hope the capital police sue them next. Fox can’t fend off everyone and I suspect the police won’t just settle for a small payoff
Hmm, something about the moon.....Bill’s best quote of all time. Tide goes in tide goes out you cannot explain that.
Hmm, something about the moon.....
This isn’t a problem for them as Biden isn’t going to sue them for defamation.Fox News hasn't learned their lesson. Still putting out unfounded conspiracy theories on the air. More evidence for the trial.
‘The Risk Was Real’: Fox Hosts Ignore Own Reporters To Falsely Suggest Biden Air Raid Sirens Were Faked (msn.com)
Not Biden specifically but more evidence of their M.O. of putting out lies over the air. Dominion will have a field day going back to the days of birtherism. All the evidence proves a pattern and practice dating back to early 2000s. They used to be way more subtle when they lied.This isn’t a problem for them as Biden isn’t going to sue them for defamation.
That being said I still think this underscores a very real problem for Fox, and conservative media more widely. Their audience DEMANDS to be lied to, and lies can land you in legal hot water. If you don’t lie to your audience though, they find someone who will.
Not Biden specifically but more evidence of their M.O. of putting out lies over the air. Dominion will have a field day going back to the days of birtherism. All the evidence proves a pattern and practice dating back to early 2000s. They used to be way more subtle when they lied.
I remember a host got in trouble when she called the Obamas de facto terrorists by engaging in a "terrorist fist jab" claiming "some people are saying"
Right - Dominion won't likely just stick to how Fox reported on them, they will point out the years of constant known fabrication to show that it's a pattern built up over countless false stories and accusations made by Fox News.
It's not likely they will be allowed to present evidence of prior dishonesty by Fox News. Fortunately they won't need to.
Why not? Pattern and practice with motive? Shows it’s the normal MO of Fox News. Some point during trial Fox will be asked, “why did you lie to your audience?” There needs to be more of an answer then, “we were worried our viewers would leave for Newsmax”.
Even if they don’t let it in, time for the other networks to pull out the cacophony of Fox Lies and run then during trial coverage. It will be a massive dump.
From what I understand prior bad acts are only admissible if the defendant opens the door by claiming they have never done anything wrong. Or something to that effect.
Otherwise it is not relevant to the case and prejudicial.
Seems the prosecution can put Sean Hannity on the stand and start by asking, "have you ever knowingly promoted a conspiracy theory that you knew had no basis in fact?"From what I understand prior bad acts are only admissible if the defendant opens the door by claiming they have never done anything wrong. Or something to that effect.
Otherwise it is not relevant to the case and prejudicial.
Something fucky going on:The matter of her possible disbarment is going to trial in Texas in April. It was previously set for trial last October, but there was a continuance. The state bar wants her disbarred and have filed suit, but ultimately the decision belongs to a judge. So far the judge assigned to the case refused to dismiss it pursuant to a pre-trial motion last June.
Sidney Powell is trying to save her law license
As the House Jan. 6 committee wrapped up its final report, Sidney Powell, onetime lawyer for former President Donald Trump, doubled down on her claims of election fraud in courttheeagle.com
Sidney Powell Could Still Be Disbarred As Court Lets Case Against Her Move Forward
The State Bar of Texas alleges Powell committed professional misconduct with her attempts to overturn the 2020 election.www.forbes.com
Something fucky going on:
Trump 2020 Fraud Backer Sidney Powell’s Texas Ethics Case Tossed
(Bloomberg) -- A Texas judge has tossed out a disciplinary case against attorney Sidney Powell, finding state bar regulators failed to present enough valid evidence to keep alive claims that she violated ethics rules by filing frivolous post-election lawsuits.Most Read from BloombergNigeria...www.yahoo.com
Something fucky going on:
Trump 2020 Fraud Backer Sidney Powell’s Texas Ethics Case Tossed
(Bloomberg) -- A Texas judge has tossed out a disciplinary case against attorney Sidney Powell, finding state bar regulators failed to present enough valid evidence to keep alive claims that she violated ethics rules by filing frivolous post-election lawsuits.Most Read from BloombergNigeria...www.yahoo.com