Whether he says that or not makes absolutely no difference. Either they hacked them and got access or they didn't. Trump's feelings on the matter are not relevant as to whether they gain access or not. I disagree with Trump on wanting them to have access. I don't want the Ruskies to have access to sensitive data.
It's interesting how you are spinning it.
I'll simplify it. Trump is running for President. Do you think our President should be hoping our adversaries get our Secrets or hack into our political parties? And how disqualifying do you think that is for a candidate running for President to say something like that?
That or write in the middle woman who gave him 20% of our nuclear arms material.Trump voters should just skip the middle man and write-in Putin.
Good, hopefully whoever hacked her and the DNC has all of the juicy details to be released soon. You're only upset because it hurts your pathetic candidate. Full transparency is good for our country except when it hurts your candidate.
Without going through your posting history I am quite confident that you are absolutely positive that Hillary broke the law and kept classified secrets on her email server.
I can't speak for him, but I definitely don't think it would be good for our country for our foes to gain access to sensitive information. If it did happen, we know who's fault it was.The very same server that you think it would be "good for our country" if China and Russia hacked and obtained said classified state secrets.
The mental gymnastics here are hilarious. Trump asking a foreign government to commit a federal crime is Clinton's fault.
lol.
It is disturbing and a compromise to national security that a foreign policy would do this. It is more disturbing that our politicians put themselves into situations that allow them to be compromised. If Clinton was clean as the driven snow then the news cycle would fixate more on the national security implications and less on the revelations.A foreign power hacking into one of our political parties in an effort to influence the election is absolutely a compromise of our national security. What is the argument that it is not?
And talk about mental gymnastics. The crime has already been done. It wouldn't have been able to be done had hillary not been "extrme careless". The emails *ARE DELETED* , so how could he be asking them to commit a crime when it had to have been already committed?????????The mental gymnastics here are hilarious. Trump asking a foreign government to commit a federal crime is Clinton's fault.
lol.
Alex Jones called, he's got a sale on tinfoil.That or write in the middle woman who gave him 20% of our nuclear arms material.
The mental gymnastics here are hilarious. Trump asking a foreign government to commit a federal crime is Clinton's fault.
lol.
Yeah, including inviting in anybody to lower wages and get votes.Anything for your team. Welcome to tribal America.
Did you read the article? He wants Russia to hack Hilary's Email Server. You know the one you guys are mad at her for having because it contained Top Secrets?
Hillary said the her personal home server doesn't have any confidental material. surely that must be the case since she is so trustworthy
Why would he not want hillary to win if she is so nice to his country as to give him our uranium when she was lowly sec state. Imagine what he could do with her as president! It would make gold contracts in haiti, uranium, and Africa oil/minerals look like chump change.Alex Jones called, he's got a sale on tinfoil.
They have already obtained it. He is asking for its return.And Trump has said that it does, meaning he is inviting the Russian government to illegally obtain classified information.
I find it funny that conservatives have repeatedly accused Clinton and Obama of treason, only to turn around and defend someone who is explicitly advocating the acquisition of what he believes to be classified material by a hostile foreign government.
I can only imagine the shrieks of 'TREASON' if the situation were reversed.
Why would he not want hillary to win if she is so nice to his country as to give him our uranium when she was lowly sec state. Imagine what he could do with her as president! It would make gold contracts in haiti, uranium, and Africa oil/minerals look like chump change.
They have already obtained it. He is asking for its return.
He can't ask them to hack something that has already been hacked.
That's like asking a robber who already robbed the bank to return the money and being blamed for the robbery.
You mean like Joe Kennedy conspiring with the soviets to get rid of Reagan? Such a great democrat hero the guy who liberalized immigration. To what end...?
How so? Did she not accept tens of millions thru the cgi in "donations" from companies owned, affiliated, or influenced by the Russian government just before, and after she lobbied for and approved the sale of our uranium mining to russia? Was bill not in Russia giving a "speech" at 3X his usual rate just as that conversation was happening?Uranium? You've been duped again.
You know the one's with the top secret emails that you guys have been railing against? Do you think a presidential candidate should be hoping our adversaries get our Top Secrets?