Donald Trump: ‘I Hope’ Russia Hacked Clinton’s Email Servers

[Zstream]

Trump is talking about how he hopes Russia hacked Clinton's secretary of state email.

Uhh her email was the target of every hacker out there. To think otherwise is just stupid. Do you know how many attacks are targeted at large enterprises and succeed? To think it would take the Russian government to hack it is just down right dumb.

 

[Jaskalas]

Yes, except Trump said he HOPES Russia gets access to them.

If Russia has it I hope they show us...
I stand by Trump on this issue.

Imagine that, a real person without a vested interest in causing trouble with Russia. If they want to fight ISIS, let them. If they want to release emails, fine by me. Maybe our relations with other nations can improve.

 

[PokerGuy]

It's beautiful

Donald Trump Just Got Hillary Clinton To Admit Her E-mails Are A ‘National Security Issue’
http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/27...it-her-e-mails-are-a-national-security-issue/

haha, that's funny. She's lied and twisted herself into a corner. So, those emails that she claimed had no classified info (lie), that she was cleared to put on her own server (lie), that she carelessly put there for convenience (lie), that was really a non-story vast right wing conspiracy (lie)... those now turn out to be a "national security issue"

Good stuff.

That's the problem for someone like her that just can't stop lying. At some point all the lies start becoming impossible to manage. Lucky for her she has a complicit media that won't call her out for all these things, but the public is getting a slow education.

 

[PokerGuy]

This is going to be a good tool for Trump to use. So, you say there was no classified information on your server. If that's the case, how come the Russians gaining access to that non-classified information is a "national security issue"? Were you lying about classified information being included on that server, or are you lying about it being a national security issue?

 

[LegendKiller]

Actually no, the witnesses and video showed she was right. Looks like you got duped too.

The Florida prosecutor in charge of the case said that although they didn't think they had a strong enough case to prosecute there was no reasonable doubt that Lewandowski grabbed Fields, despite his and the Trump campaign's repeated denials.

But he didn't assault her, didn't almost pull her down, and she violated the security bubble against warning and any private citizen can do what he did (and even what she claimed he did) to aid law enforcement. Breitbart didn't play ball either her and liar shapiro, so they walked and destroyed their credibility on the follow.

 

[fskimospy]

haha, that's funny. She's lied and twisted herself into a corner. So, those emails that she claimed had no classified info (lie), that she was cleared to put on her own server (lie), that she carelessly put there for convenience (lie), that was really a non-story vast right wing conspiracy (lie)... those now turn out to be a "national security issue"

Good stuff.

That's the problem for someone like her that just can't stop lying. At some point all the lies start becoming impossible to manage. Lucky for her she has a complicit media that won't call her out for all these things, but the public is getting a slow education.

You realize that's not what her statement said, right? Any candidate encouraging a foreign power to hack into any other candidate's email regardless of contents is a national security issue. Any idiot can see that much I would hope.

Gotta get out of the right wing news bubble sometimes.

 

[fskimospy]

But he didn't assault her, didn't almost pull her down, and she violated the security bubble against warning and any private citizen can do what he did (and even what she claimed he did) to aid law enforcement. Breitbart didn't play ball either her and liar shapiro, so they walked and destroyed their credibility on the follow.

Look at the avalanche of unsupported statements and excuses. Remember when you claimed that audio which supported her case was fabricated as part of an elaborate plot to smear Trump?

That thread was right about the point it became totally clear that you've lost all ability to think rationally when it comes to this election.

 

[fskimospy]

Uhh her email was the target of every hacker out there. To think otherwise is just stupid. Do you know how many attacks are targeted at large enterprises and succeed? To think it would take the Russian government to hack it is just down right dumb.

That's irrelevant, he is saying he hopes they did it, ie: wishing for successful espionage against the United States.

How many candidates do you generally support who spend their days asking other countries to commit federal crimes?

 

[LegendKiller]

Look at the avalanche of unsupported statements and excuses. Remember when you claimed that audio which supported her case was fabricated as part of an elaborate plot to smear Trump?

That thread was right about the point it became totally clear that you've lost all ability to think rationally when it comes to this election.

And I turned out to be correct. She lied. She fabricated her story about almost being pulled down. My stance, the entire time was that the audio was not contemporaneous to the act, thus, time stamping and actual effect couldn't be proven and thus it could have beem faked to fit her narrative. Her narrative was faked and rhe audio was not contemporaneous. Further, video of the event from her own camera man was missing and he changed his story 3 times. Lewandowski was completely cleared of the lies.

But nice to know you admitted that this is a national security issue and that not only did your candidate lie repeatedly, but now admits her emails are sensitive enough that a hack is a national security issue.

You're fucked. Good bye.

 

[PokerGuy]

You realize that's not what her statement said, right? Any candidate encouraging a foreign power to hack into any other candidate's email regardless of contents is a national security issue. Any idiot can see that much I would hope.

Did you conveniently forget the context? He was talking about the 30,000+ emails hildebeast and her co-conspirators deleted. The "missing" emails. Also, for the umpteenth time, he's not encouraging them to hack into her email, since that server and the emails no longer exists. If they did hack it, then they already have all the information anyway, and thus encouraging them to "find" the "missing" emails is not in any way a national security issue.

Gotta get out of the right wing news bubble sometimes.

As soon as you venture outside of the left wing bubble haha

 

[PokerGuy]

But nice to know you admitted that this is a national security issue and that not only did your candidate lie repeatedly, but now admits her emails are sensitive enough that a hack is a national security issue.

Yep, this is one of those times when the tangled web of lies gets tricky to navigate. Good thing for her she has the complicit media to help her through. Thanks to the DNC email leaks we have more confirmation of just how complicit the media really is.

 

[fskimospy]

Did you conveniently forget the context? He was talking about the 30,000+ emails hildebeast and her co-conspirators deleted. The "missing" emails. Also, for the umpteenth time, he's not encouraging them to hack into her email, since that server and the emails no longer exists. If they did hack it, then they already have all the information anyway, and thus encouraging them to "find" the "missing" emails is not in any way a national security issue.

As soon as you venture outside of the left wing bubble haha

It's an amazing day when partisanship has become so strong that a candidate for president saying he hopes the Russian government has hacked his opponent's email is not considered a national security issue. This would be true if it were her personal email, her email server, or anything else.

You guys have seriously lost your minds.

 

[LegendKiller]

It's an amazing day when partisanship has become so strong that a candidate for president saying he hopes the Russian government has hacked his opponent's email is not considered a national security issue. This would be true if it were her personal email, her email server, or anything else.

You guys have seriously lost your minds.

If she told the truth this wouldn't be a peoblem, would it?

 

[fskimospy]

And I turned out to be correct. She lied. She fabricated her story about almost being pulled down. My stance, the entire time was that the audio was not contemporaneous to the act, thus, time stamping and actual effect couldn't be proven and thus it could have beem faked to fit her narrative. Her narrative was faked and rhe audio was not contemporaneous. Further, video of the event from her own camera man was missing and he changed his story 3 times. Lewandowski was completely cleared of the lies.

But nice to know you admitted that this is a national security issue and that not only did your candidate lie repeatedly, but now admits her emails are sensitive enough that a hack is a national security issue.

You're fucked. Good bye.

Actually this is what you said:

So let me get this straight: in addition to the multi person conspiracy to set up Trump at the event itself, you're saying they created a fake audio transcript to send to Politico?

Fake audio to go along with the fake pull down and fake injury.

Wouldn't be the first woman to cry Wolf. Wouldn't even be her first time.

As always, all I can say is:

 

[Fern]

Its more he wants them to reveal the results of the crime. They cannot commit the crime now as the email server is offline.

Yes, thank you.

I don't know what the Donald actually said, but nobody's hacking that server. It's decommissioned and the 30k emails were deleted.

Fern

 

[LegendKiller]

Actually this is what you said:





As always, all I can say is:

It was fake audio. What she said on the audio didn't happen.

But at least we now know that it wasn't a fake server and not one with fake classified emails.

Hillary just confirmed that today. Great job!

 

[Zstream]

That's irrelevant, he is saying he hopes they did it, ie: wishing for successful espionage against the United States.

How many candidates do you generally support who spend their days asking other countries to commit federal crimes?

Disagree completely. Hilary having her email server out in the wild was wishing for or hoping for espionage. Maybe she should be looked at for treason? Also, I don't support any candidate, but nice touch.

 

[Fern]

LOL, Trump is trolling the sh!t out of people.

I never thought he'd run, much less get the nomination. But I knew if he did it would be entertaining.

The media attention today should about Bill Clinton's speech last night. LOL, Trump blew it right off the front page.

Fern

 

[fskimospy]

Disagree completely. Hilary having her email server out in the wild was wishing for or hoping for espionage. Maybe she should be looked at for treason? Also, I don't support any candidate, but nice touch.

That would require a bizarre rewriting of the definition of treason. Why would we do that?

Can you explain why someone saying they hoped espionage occurred is not them hoping for espionage? I mean that seems like sort of a truism.

 

[DrPizza]

It is disturbing and a compromise to national security that a foreign policy would do this.

Agreed.

It is more disturbing that our politicians put themselves into situations that allow them to be compromised.

Also agreed

And what's even worse is when our politicians encourage a foreign entity to hack in this situation.

You left off that part.

3 wrongs don't make a right.

 

[LegendKiller]

Agreed.
Also agreed
You left off that part.

3 wrongs don't make a right.

Except he didn't encourage them to hack. It is either already hacked or it isn't. You can't encourage something that has already happened and can't happen now.

That's like saying "I encourage bill clinton to fuck Monica Lewinsky 20 years ago so we can use it as ammunition today" without the benefit of a time machine. He already fucked her, on his volition and his wife blamed somebody else (vast right wing conspiracy)

And yet again, a clinton fucked up and is trying to blame somebody else.

 

[LegendKiller]

That would require a bizarre rewriting of the definition of treason. Why would we do that?

Can you explain why someone saying they hoped espionage occurred is not them hoping for espionage? I mean that seems like sort of a truism.

She committed treason by knowingly exposing national security emails (thanks for clarifying that today, btw) to foreign governments using unsecured servers and unsecured devices accessing those unsecured servers on foreign soil. She was pretty much tossing national security papers into the air as she walked along the streets of Moscow.

She fucked up. She owns this. She built that.

 

[werepossum]

It's beautiful

Donald Trump Just Got Hillary Clinton To Admit Her E-mails Are A ‘National Security Issue’
http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/27...it-her-e-mails-are-a-national-security-issue/

lol Inadvertent self ownage for the win.

It's an amazing day when partisanship has become so strong that a candidate for president saying he hopes the Russian government has hacked his opponent's email is not considered a national security issue. This would be true if it were her personal email, her email server, or anything else.

You guys have seriously lost your minds.

lol And you guys have seriously lost your souls.

She committed treason by knowingly exposing national security emails (thanks for clarifying that today, btw) to foreign governments using unsecured servers and unsecured devices accessing those unsecured servers on foreign soil. She was pretty much tossing national security papers into the air as she walked along the streets of Moscow.

She fucked up. She owns this.

While I fully agree that she fucked up (albeit intentionally and methodically) and owns this, it's a far, far cry from treason. Stupid, sure. Putting self before country, sure. But the bar for treason is intentionally set very high.

 

[sportage]

Thats no way to talk about your next president.
The kids may be listening.

 

[LegendKiller]

lol Inadvertent self ownage for the win.


lol And you guys have seriously lost your souls.


While I fully agree that she fucked up (albeit intentionally and methodically) and owns this, it's a far, far cry from treason. Stupid, sure. Putting self before country, sure. But the bar for treason is intentionally set very high.

If they want to lambaste trump for the historical actions of another person and call it treason, then the actual action is the treasonous one. Trump didn't hack the server and it can't be hacked now.