I think those who believe this law is disgusting undermine their position when they go on to vandalize Yelp and dox the daughter.
I think those who believe this law is disgusting undermine their position when they go on to vandalize Yelp and dox the daughter.
People are free to say whatever they want. They are not free from suffering the consequences of that speech.
Its called harassment.
And doxing the daughter because you don't agree with their parents political decisions is ok and/or they shouldn't face consequences?
Of course there will be no repercussions on the ongoing harassment brought on the daughter because her contact information was published because it doesn't fit the narrative. Be as dirty and slimy as you want as long as it agrees with SJW politics.
What's a leftist? Is that like an insider's term that NASCAR fans use to describe NASCAR fans?
"Lets boycott Indiana but lets keep doing business with Saudi Arabia."
I just saw Connecticut banned travel to Indiana. These leftwits won't ban Ebola travel but they'll ban travel to a state because of a law that they themselves also have - like CT:
Connecticut General Statutes section 52-571b
(current as of 2001)
Sec. 52-571b. Action or defense authorized when state or political subdivision burdens a person's exercise of religion.
(a) The state or any political subdivision of the state shall not burden a person's exercise of religion under section 3 of article first of the constitution of the state even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The state or any political subdivision of the state may burden a person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest, and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
(c) A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened in violation of the provisions of this section may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against the state or any political subdivision of the state.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the state or any political subdivision of the state to burden any religious belief.
(e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect, interpret or in any way address that portion of article seventh of the constitution of the state that prohibits any law giving a preference to any religious society or denomination in the state. The granting of government funding, benefits or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the constitution of the state, shall not constitute a violation of this section. As used in this subsection, the term "granting" does not include the denial of government funding, benefits or exemptions.
(f) For the purposes of this section, "state or any political subdivision of the state" includes any agency, board, commission, department, officer or employee of the state or any political subdivision of the state, and "demonstrates" means meets the burdens of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion.
http://essexuu.org/ctstat.html
About that..their own version of same law is more stringent that the one in Indiana :awe:
Of all the countries in the world, Saudi Arabia is one of the ones I think we should be boycotting the most. They have horrible human rights abuses.
We should only trade with countries that have good human rights and worker rights records. Anybody else should be banished to the corner, left to stew and simmer until they are ready to join the world stage.
About that..their own version of same law is more stringent that the one in Indiana :awe:
Its called harassment.
And doxing the daughter because you don't agree with their parents political decisions is ok and/or they shouldn't face consequences?
Of course there will be no repercussions on the ongoing harassment brought on the daughter because her contact information was published because it doesn't fit the narrative. Be as dirty and slimy as you want as long as it agrees with SJW politics.
wow, you guys really are fucking illiterate, aren't you?
All of the facts and evidence shoved in your face, over and over again, about how unique this law is from the others, and you still refuse to accept how demonstrably wrong you are.
Why is it so important to mask your true hate for homosexuals by hiding behind "democratic laws!", that you have to reject any and all attempts to be properly informed about the issues that you face?
No you can't;Therefore you are forever broken.^
|
|
|
Another righty incapable of understanding context.
You can't fix stupid.
No you can't;Therefore you are forever broken.
asshat shill.
Keep dreaming that what you post on a tech site msg board politics section is influential.
LOL
I'm quite literate,just because because i don't always respond with: "You're wrong,fucktard"
doesn't mean I didn't see what you typed.
aka:
"wow, you guys really are fucking illiterate, aren't you?"
Why is people like you always lead with some kind of attempt to demean/diminish someone's intelligence?
I know why:It's called "Attempt to marginalize"
Standard shill tactics.
ha ha let me rephrase: H4r H4r
a) You are not smarter than me.
b) You are on the wrong side of how things actually are.
c) You are promoting disinformation.
d) I do not intend to be taken super-seriously on a tech site political blog.
e) You do.It's your job.
Oh you are "literate" alright, it's just you don't fucking understand what you read because you are stupid.
It's why when people post facts that contradict your posts, you double down on stupid and keep repeating stupid and instead of countering with facts. You then pretend that the posts and threads you respond to don't matter.
You are a joke of a poster whose posts border on trolling and crazy.
If you get tired of being called stupid then stop posting stupid shit
Your "news" link does not coincide with the actual amendment.
Do you understand that?
Do you know what "slanting" is?
I'm sure you do, because you do it every minute you're around.
Do you know the definition of stupid?
It's "Knowing better,but doing it anyway"
This sir,defines you.
You know better.You know you're spinning,deflecting,spreading misinformation, and insulting,but you do it anyway.
That=You are stupid.
I'm quite literate,just because because i don't always respond with: "You're wrong,fucktard"
doesn't mean I didn't see what you typed.
aka:
"wow, you guys really are fucking illiterate, aren't you?"
Why is people like you always lead with some kind of attempt to demean/diminish someone's intelligence?
I know why:It's called "Attempt to marginalize"
Standard shill tactics.
ha ha let me rephrase: H4r H4r
a) You are not smarter than me.
b) You are on the wrong side of how things actually are.
c) You are promoting disinformation.
d) I do not intend to be taken super-seriously on a tech site political blog.
e) You do.It's your job.
Matthew 15:11
Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
If God is down with cock sucking why aren't you?
Please articulate why the approx 20 other states that have a similar law and the federal govt aren't being boycotted.
TIA
Fern
1) This law includes businesses and corporations.
2) It appears to be an offensive move to counter the SCOTUS's likely ruling of making state laws banning same sex marriage unconstitutional.
3) Its intent. The laws intent is clear to all but the most bigoted of hacks, that this laws intention was to allow businesses to descriminate against LGBT people (all one needs to do is look at Pence's past comments and positions as well as simply look at who was present at the signing of the law).
On #1, so what? SCOTUS already ruled on this in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby.
On #2, I don't know how you come to that conclusion. The law has nothing to dow ith gay marriage as far as I can tell.
On #3, discrimination would already be covered by public accommodation laws so it's moot.