Originally posted by: EndGame
As for the "if it was a worthwhile cause" argument, whose to say what is or isn't?
Originally posted by: FettsBabe
As for the oil fields, do you not remember the pictures of oil fields burning during the Gulf War? All those fires were started by Saddam's troops. As a result, there were black clouds and all sorts of nasty pollution in the region for quite a while.
Yes, I remember those horrible pictures. I also watched a documentary on what it took to extinguish the fires. It was really sad. However, the plan they have isn't to "protect" them it is to "take" them. Its not our decision to decide what to do with the oil.
Originally posted by: FettsBabe
I wish I could locate a link to the news I saw on TV last night. The Oil Field Plan wasn't a plan to "protect" the oil fields. It was more like we were going in and taking them over. The US should give the Oil Fields to whomever is in power because it is Iraqi oil. If we want to eliminate Saddam that is ok with me, but to take over the Oil Fields and for the US to make all the decisions is "commy" within itself.
Yes, Saddam is evil and has turned on his people many many times. His son is worse than him though. If we were there because he was "inhumane" that would be different, but we aren't. We are there for the oil. As a note, Afghanistan had numerous "inhumane" problems for many years (prior to 9-11);however, we sat on our butts and didn't do a thing. Tajikastan is the poorest country in the world. We aren't there helping them.
I couldn't serve right now because I am pregnant, but if I weren't pregnant, I would serve IF it there was a valid reason to go to war. If not, I would leave. I'm not dying nor will I kill other people for oil or any other inappropriate reason. Only drafting men is sexist. If we are going to have a draft lets draft men and women.
Originally posted by: NetworkDad
I'd serve, no question about it.
Tell me what exactly is the problem with the US proposal for the oil wells;Originally posted by: FettsBabe
As for the oil fields, do you not remember the pictures of oil fields burning during the Gulf War? All those fires were started by Saddam's troops. As a result, there were black clouds and all sorts of nasty pollution in the region for quite a while.
Yes, I remember those horrible pictures. I also watched a documentary on what it took to extinguish the fires. It was really sad. However, the plan they have isn't to "protect" them it is to "take" them. Its not our decision to decide what to do with the oil.
Originally posted by: notfred
If the United States was being attacked, I'd serve. If the president wants to sacrifice American lives for a personal vendetta or to lower the price of oil imported from the middle east, I wouldn't (I wouldn't RUN, I just wouldn't serve).
I wish I could locate a link to the news I saw on TV last night. The Oil Field Plan wasn't a plan to "protect" the oil fields. It was more like we were going in and taking them over. The US should give the Oil Fields to whomever is in power because it is Iraqi oil. If we want to eliminate Saddam that is ok with me, but to take over the Oil Fields and for the US to make all the decisions is "commy" within itself.
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: EndGame
As for the "if it was a worthwhile cause" argument, whose to say what is or isn't?
When it's my life on the line - I am.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States plans to secure Iraqi oilfields if it invades and is looking into the possibility of ramping up oil production beyond the U.N. oil-for-food program to pay for post-war reconstruction, Bush administration officials said on Sunday.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I served in the military 10 years ago. But if I were called up today I'd tell them to stuff it.
A draft is completely wrong. If out of the few hundred million people living in this country, they can't round up enough people who VOLUNTEER to fight, then we have no business fighting the war. The American people obviously won't support a war that they won't volunteer their sons and daughters for.
I think if there was a cause worth fighting for, Americans would see it and volunteer to defend themselves.
Originally posted by: notfred
If the United States was being attacked, I'd serve. If the president wants to sacrifice American lives for a personal vendetta or to lower the price of oil imported from the middle east, I wouldn't (I wouldn't RUN, I just wouldn't serve).
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
I would serve. Anyone who ran whom I know, I would turn in or shoot them myself. Stupid bastards. :|
Its a concept called freedom of choice, a value held highly in this country.how come people born in the US are allowed to be a member of the communist party? odd