Now that we've decided (1) 15k is the way to go, which controller card would you reccomend for its price/performance? Also, it looks like I might get the (12) 10K drives for free to play with anyway, so what inexpensive, 40mb/s Hardware RAID0 card would you suggest? Since this is an extremely outdated interface, there are bound to be some good bargains on high quality cards that run 40mb/s. Do you guys have any favorites or reccomendations?
<< Hi guys, this is my first general hardware forum thread. From lurking I've seen that many of you have valuable experience and suggestions that can help me. I'm uncertain about how to create the "snappiest" computer possible with a given CPU on my $700 budget and I'd appreciate your ideas and suggestions.
Some background on the situation:
1) My goal is to achieve the illusion of having a faster CPU which high RPM SCSI drives are known to produce.
2) My access patterns most closely resemble that of a workstation, and not database server where spindle count is king.
3) My previous fastest hard drive experience was with (2) 7.2K RPM WD100GB 2MB cache drives in Software RAID0.
4) Megabytes per dollar is not an issue; anywhere from 18GB to 320GB is fine.
5) The sole criteria is that I must have the "snappiest" and most responsive partition for my O/S, Program Files, Games, and CAD Software.
My Dilema -- And Your Top Pick?:
(12) 10K RPM Original Cheetahs 4GB 40MB/s SCSI on Mid-Range Hardware RAID0 (The drives are free discards and 40MB/s cramps the STR, but I want the most responsive and least latent solution available)
(4) 7.2K RPM WD80GB 2MB cache ATA100 IDE's in 3Ware ATA100 Hardware RAID0
(2) 10K RPM Atlas II's 18GB 8MB cache u160 SCSI in Software or Entry-Level Hardware RAID0
(1) 15K Cheetah 18GB 3.6ns u160 SCSI Single Channel
How widely would the subjective performance differ between these choices in your best estimate? If it's 10% or less between the SCSI choices, I'll go for the free 10K Cheetahs and a quality Hardware RAID0 PCI Card I should probably consider 10% negligible since my previous best was dual 7.2K IDE's.
If you have any suggestions\options, words of wisdom, or even just friendly comments that would help in my quest for the Holy Grail of Snappiness, I would LOVE to hear them and will consider all suggestions
Thanks in advance guys, you're my favorite and only online community that I regard with such loyalty and pride -- have been for years and plan to for many more to come!
--y0shi >>
<< Hi guys, this is my first general hardware forum thread. From lurking I've seen that many of you have valuable experience and suggestions that can help me. I'm uncertain about how to create the "snappiest" computer possible with a given CPU on my $700 budget and I'd appreciate your ideas and suggestions.
Some background on the situation:
1) My goal is to achieve the illusion of having a faster CPU which high RPM SCSI drives are known to produce.
2) My access patterns most closely resemble that of a workstation, and not database server where spindle count is king.
3) My previous fastest hard drive experience was with (2) 7.2K RPM WD100GB 2MB cache drives in Software RAID0.
4) Megabytes per dollar is not an issue; anywhere from 18GB to 320GB is fine.
5) The sole criteria is that I must have the "snappiest" and most responsive partition for my O/S, Program Files, Games, and CAD Software.
My Dilema -- And Your Top Pick?:
(12) 10K RPM Original Cheetahs 4GB 40MB/s SCSI on Mid-Range Hardware RAID0 (The drives are free discards and 40MB/s cramps the STR, but I want the most responsive and least latent solution available)
(4) 7.2K RPM WD80GB 2MB cache ATA100 IDE's in 3Ware ATA100 Hardware RAID0
(2) 10K RPM Atlas II's 18GB 8MB cache u160 SCSI in Software or Entry-Level Hardware RAID0
(1) 15K Cheetah 18GB 3.6ns u160 SCSI Single Channel
How widely would the subjective performance differ between these choices in your best estimate? If it's 10% or less between the SCSI choices, I'll go for the free 10K Cheetahs and a quality Hardware RAID0 PCI Card I should probably consider 10% negligible since my previous best was dual 7.2K IDE's.
If you have any suggestions\options, words of wisdom, or even just friendly comments that would help in my quest for the Holy Grail of Snappiness, I would LOVE to hear them and will consider all suggestions
Thanks in advance guys, you're my favorite and only online community that I regard with such loyalty and pride -- have been for years and plan to for many more to come!
--y0shi >>