- May 11, 2008
- 20,648
- 1,171
- 126
I recently came across some literature and i have a question.
According to this article i read, there is no electrical voltage difference (hence no electrical field) anywhere in a given material when it is superconducting. When the ends of the superconducting material is connected together, the electrical current keeps flowing with out loss. Hence i can assume there is no electrical field applied and it is assumed there is no resistance.
From easy use of Ohms law, U = I * R. Thus it is claimed there is no electrical field.
But according to the article, the drift velocity of the electrons is the same as in a normal conductor where resistance occurs.
But the strange thing is, is that the drift speed is calculated while using an electrical field.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ohmmic.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/fermi.html#c1
(i guess i am wrong because i have not consumed enough coffee yet and i am not an expert)
What is wrongly stated in this article or what have I written/ assumed wrong ?
Or is their something else going on ?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
According to this article i read, there is no electrical voltage difference (hence no electrical field) anywhere in a given material when it is superconducting. When the ends of the superconducting material is connected together, the electrical current keeps flowing with out loss. Hence i can assume there is no electrical field applied and it is assumed there is no resistance.
From easy use of Ohms law, U = I * R. Thus it is claimed there is no electrical field.
But according to the article, the drift velocity of the electrons is the same as in a normal conductor where resistance occurs.
But the strange thing is, is that the drift speed is calculated while using an electrical field.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ohmmic.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/fermi.html#c1
(i guess i am wrong because i have not consumed enough coffee yet and i am not an expert)
What is wrongly stated in this article or what have I written/ assumed wrong ?
Or is their something else going on ?
Thank you in advance for your answers.