Smoking anything is not the best idea.
However, no i was not high.
My brother smoked a lot of pot when I was growing up and I was very against it (and everything really, I was stuck up). My senior year I did a research paper on it, and everything I found out turned my opinion on it. Since then, I've been very pro legalization since I realized is relatively harmless.
Eating weed is absolutely harmless. And the stuff that makes you high, THC, your brain actually has receptors for it. So yea, your body welcomes it (that's why you feel so good when you receive it into your system), like oxygen, and water. Google it. Who'da thunk right?
http://www.marijuana.com/science/117169-why-do-we-have-thc-receptors-our-brains.html
As you said, smoking anything is not the best idea, so clearly your body does not welcome it. In addition, the cannabinoid receptors in the brain are not there for the purpose of THC binding from the inhalation of pot. There are numerous ENDOcannabinoids that serve as the standard ligands. Hell, alpha-bungarotoxin binds to ACh receptors and will kill you. Just because an exogenous substance CAN bind to normal body receptors doesn't mean it's supposed to. That is just a single instance of the myriad of substances that bind to AC receptors causing death. Comparing the intake of THC to oxygen and water is just ignorant. I'm sure your research paper did it's job, but it clearly wasn't much of a scientific paper.
THAT SAID, much of the reason there is very limited research (both for and against pot) is because IT IS illegal in many places. I personally wish it WERE legal so that more research could be done. I've read just as many positive studies on pot as I have negative. I would love to see more thorough risk/benefit papers written as I think there may quite a few viable uses for it.
Oh, and I tend not to use Google for my research, but thanks for the suggestion. Sorry, I had to edit this as I noticed that your source of information was a pro-pot website's forum. ... yeah.
And wait, in your most recent post did you just say that it's MORE likely that cannabinoid receptors exist not for endogenous cannabinoid signalling but for consumption of pot? Please tell me you're not in any kind of scientific field.
Last edited: