Well...hopefully it's not resolution locked too. That would be really sad...like Squaresoft duping all us PC (re)buyers of FF13 into a 60GB download of a game that only runs at 720p...and has horrendous framerate to boot.
How can anyone think this is acceptable? 30 fps is nearly unplayable... The stuttering is so bad it even affects input response most of the time
I would gladly trade extra details for 60 fps in any game
there is no such thing as butter smooth at 30 frames per second on a PC monitor especially using a mouse.If its console like butter-smooth 30fps - fine be me.
Little input lag is non-issue in this type of game. Characters have its weight. We don't want characters doing 180' turn on the knifes edge - mario times are over.
30ms input lag shouldn't be a problem.
We are pushing for life-like graphics, but we need to have life-like physics aswell.
reducing load? That makes no sense you're going to have more load if anything else because that is a wider aspect ratio that will show more of the game.Arcording to the link. The aspect ratio for the game is also fixed at 2.35:1. I assume that means black bars.
Guess thats another way of reducing load...
reducing load? That makes no sense you're going to have more load if anything else because that is a wider aspect ratio that will show more of the game.
A wider FOV typically has very little impact on frame rate. I've even seen a couple games that consistently give you a minor boost with a higher FOV.reducing load? That makes no sense you're going to have more load if anything else because that is a wider aspect ratio that will show more of the game.
no you have it backwards. The black bars on your screen have nothing to do with how a game is demanding or not.again if anything it would be more demanding because your display more information of the game. Using your logic someone using a 5:4 ratio monitor would have a less demanding game than someone using a 16:9 screen even if running the same exact 21:9 scene. seriously think about what you're saying because it makes no sense.Less pixels.
The point was that having the black bars on your screen does not make a game less demanding and then again if anything it would be more demanding because of wider field of view of the game is being shown. I did not necessarily say that it would be more demanding but just pointing out that he has it backwards thinking it would be less demanding.Never was interested in this game, but now I actively dislike it and this Shinji Mikami character.A wider FOV typically has very little impact on frame rate. I've even seen a couple games that consistently give you a minor boost with a higher FOV.
no you have it backwards. The black bars on your screen have nothing to do with how a game is demanding or not.again if anything it would be more demanding because your display more information of the game. Using your logic someone using a 5:4 ratio monitor would have a less demanding game than someone using a 16:9 screen even if running the same exact 21:9 scene. seriously think about what you're saying because it makes no sense.
GPU load isn't the reason this game is 30 fps, its that they made all their animations and physics only work at that and it either doesn't work or looks wonky at a higher FPS.
if you can't understand why you are wrong by now then I guess you never will.So you are saying a screen with less pixels is more demanding than one with more pixels? Interesting.
While some parts is more heavy due to the wider FOV, other parts are also less demanding when the screensize is reduced.
I understood your point, but you are still incorrect. An aspect ratio of 2.35:1 on a 1920X1080 screen has an active resolution of about 1920X817. The developers would have to be pretty stupid to design the game with a fixed view of 817 pixels, while rendering the full 1080.The point was that having the black bars on your screen does not make a game less demanding and then again if anything it would be more demanding because of wider field of view of the game is being shown. I did not necessarily say that it would be more demanding but just pointing out that he has it backwards thinking it would be less demanding.
you are not paying attention to exactly what I'm saying to him. A game is not less demanding just because it has black bars taking up the screen which is what he is saying. If you run 2560x1080 on a 5:4 screen it has the same load as running it on a 16:9 or 21:9 screen as the black bars are irrelevant.I understood your point, but you are still incorrect. An aspect ratio of 2.35:1 on a 1920X1080 screen has an active resolution of about 1920X817. The developers would have to be pretty stupid to design the game with a fixed view of 817 pixels, while rendering the full 1080.
So the CPU limit again?
That isn't what he was saying, just you are saying that. So lets move on already.you are not paying attention to exactly what I'm saying to him. A game is not less demanding just because it has black bars taking up the screen which is what he is saying. If you run 2560x1080 on a 5:4 screen it has the same load as running it on a 16:9 or 21:9 screen as the black bars are irrelevant.
A Jap version of Manhunt that requires an i7 and 4GB vRAM to render all those poorly lit linear A to B black corridors that takes up 40GB . . . . . . but that black has so much depth and so on and so forth, especially in Cinemascope that no monitor is really built for! :awe:
Take a bow! :awe:
Hint: Buy Raven's Cry instead:
http://store.steampowered.com/app/281130/