Really? Where else? Assuming you mean there are others, and you aren't thinking that there's nowhere that AMD has more market share than Intel.
I just realised about the PCI-E thing... that is a big problem, if a 2.05ghz Athlons cost 65 thats already about just $15 less than a Quad BT board, that is fanless, uses less power and is good enoght as the Athlon for about everything except gaming.
And is also just $5 cheaper than a Pentium G3220, that is better at a higher TDP, not just about actual power comsuption, that needs to be tested, and there are also $45 H81 1150 mbs around that provides both more sata and full pci-e.
And im not even considering Celerons.
So... i dont get it, this is intended only for people that wants a ITX mb, with higher IGP than BT, sacrificing fan and power? and at the same time the IGP is not that good either?
Power need to be tested, agreed, still im not gona buy a AM1 cpu for a HTPC if it needs a fan, im gona go for the BT board, because its cheaper, fanless and its likely to use less power, the IGP part im not sure how relevant it will be because is not that good either, i dont need to state that BT igp is worse, we all know that.
Im gona be crystal clear here, if i plan to do a desktop pc why should i even think about going to AM1 if for $5 to $10 max more i can get a G3220+H81? here TDP and Power are not that important, and personally i dont think its gona be a considerable power gap either. And dont forget about the Celerons, anything in 1150 seems to be a better choise performance/price on mATX format.
dont forget that we ALREADY have soldered Kabinis, those have fans. http://www.ecs.com.tw/ECSWebSite/Product/Product_Detail.aspx?DetailID=1497&MenuID=106&LanID=0
BT-D(J1900) is just 10W and they have HUGE heat sinks...
And personally i dont think AM1 will end up using less power than BT-D platform, they have a chance on that area vs 1150 platform, but i dont see that happening vs BT-D.
And im talking about prices we see so far, in fact, AMD talked about $70 for a quad.
6 x USB 3.0 (2 Front, 4 Rear), 6 x USB 2.0, 4 x SATA3, 1 x COM Port Header
Graphics Output Options : D-Sub, DVI-D, HDMI, DisplayPort
WLAN : 1 x 802.11b/g/n Module
Integrated Memory Controller
FS1b package
Support ECC
I'll just put this here for reference.
You've got to admit that saying "Avoid a dead end platform" when they pimp that they have XP compatibility is funny.
the ecs models has been out for a while but that is a soldiered solution, that doesnt mean that is has to have a fan fir the sockets version.
also AMD stated [http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014...cost-desktop-chipset-calls-intels-a-dead-end/] ~$60USD for chip and mobo not the chip solo.
as for power if there is much of a difference, it cant be more than 5-10W, which is such a negligible difference when we are talking about 15-30W power draw range.
Time to resurect opportunisticly this thread for a valuable info about the AM1 plateform APUs..
Datasheet of the Athlon (and Sempron apparently) APUs, page 5 :
http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/53738_PDS_Athlon.pdf
Integrated Memory Controller
FS1b package
Support ECC
Windows XP is probably going to still be in use for another 5 - 7 years in the embedded market. Low power AM1 motherboards/cpus are a good fit for embedded applications.
Wait, what? That puts intel server series haswell-e chips to shame:
It is a mistake, isn't it?