dual vs triple SLi

[jpk]

I currently have a SLi setup with my EVGA GTX260's. I'm thinking about adding a third matching 260 since my board will support it and adding another 260 would be relatively inexpensive. Will there be an adavantage of doing this or am I just upping my BS factor? I really want to make my machine a little future proof for a couple of years. Thanks

 

[happy medium]

I'd wait for the gtx 460 to come out (6 weeks ) and sell both gtx 260's and buy 2 gtx 460's.
I don't think the gtx 200 series plays with triple sli nicley.

 

[Attic]

I'd wait for the gtx 460 to come out (6 weeks ) and sell both gtx 260's and buy 2 gtx 460's.
I don't think the gtx 200 series plays with triple sli nicley.

Yes, this. I think you'd be better served by moving from the 260's to newer tech instead of adding another 260.

 

[jpk]

What will the cost be for the 460's?

 

[VulgarDisplay]

Don't listen to these guys. I will have an evga gtx260 for sale when my 5870 gets here on Monday.

 

[Redox]

Yes, this. I think you'd be better served by moving from the 260's to newer tech instead of adding another 260.

I'm running GTX 280's in tri-sli and definitely see the difference vs. the dual GTX 280 SLI set up I had previously (found a third one cheap when they were being discontinued in favor of the GTX 285). I should also note that I am running at 2560x1600 where the tri-sli really pays off. If you run a lower resolution, it is likely overkill.

For the incremental cost of adding another GTX 260 (~$200) you would likely see performance similar to a dual 470 sli setup, minus the DX 11 support (which is not yet widespread anyway) and save $500 in the process.

I'm planning to keep my 280 tri-sli setup until the next round of GPU's - perhaps GTX 485(?) if they bump the performance and deal with the heat/power issues. There is not enough performance difference to justify upgrading (unless I went to tri-sli 400 series which would be insanely expensive).