BoomerD
No Lifer
- Feb 26, 2006
- 63,428
- 11,757
- 136
does calling me a gay bigot make you feel better about yourself? i am actually neither which just makes you look ignorant.
i've got news for you, the bible is just one big book. as for taking it literally, you do realize that the only people who believe that are far right religious nutjobs right?
not sure what eduacation has to do with any of this. just because you are a bigot doesn't mean you aren't educated.
The bigger news story would be finding ANYONE living a life like they do, that is pro-gay. If you spend any time in a deep rural area, you'll realize political correctness stops about when all the gas stations change from BP and Shell to Marty's Gas and Ribs and Tony's Gas Stop.
does misunderstanding my message make you feel better about yourself? you love calling people bigots but did you ever think you might be one yourself?
i've got news for you silly boy, the bible is made of two books and YOU are the one who said that someones logic was flawed by pointing out slavery in the bible and therefore we must all own slaves.
stop being such a drama queen....and while you are at it, enjoy being on ignore until December 31, 2013.
And you can be labelled a bigot, which you clearly are if you do so!
Which has nothing to do with anything. He is crying about the guy getting fired. I am simply trying to explain it, which is difficult, since he is a bigot too.
Kind of funny you say that since homosexuals don't reproduce. So they don't pass on their genes. They have to rely on heterosexuals to adopt their children.
It comes down to this.
If you were a company, would you want an employee while performing in the scope of their job duties, proselytizing and telling some of your customers they are the problem with the US or that since they are homosexual they are going to hell? Or that racism wasn't a problem prior to the Civil Rights movement?
i've got news for you silly boy, the bible is made of two books and YOU are the one who said that someones logic was flawed by pointing out slavery in the bible and therefore we must all own slaves.
Last time I checked, Gays don't lose their ability to conceive or give birth because of their sexual preference.
Many gay couples use their DNA to produce children. Gay male couples may have to use surrogates, but that doesn't negate the fact that either male in the relationship can give his sperm to produce a child that is biologically related to them.
Gay women have also used sperm donors to get pregnant.
So, cut the shit and stop being a dumbass.
In trying to protect their image to the LGBT crowd, they pretty much pissed off the entire crowd that watches the damn show.
True, but in turn, do you single handily (pun intended) spite one hand to save the other?
In trying to protect their image to the LGBT crowd, they pretty much pissed off the entire crowd that watches the damn show.
They could have done.. nothing, and it wouldn't have been an issue to deal with. Now they have a media crisis on their hands.
I know it's hard for some of the people here to believe, but a lot more people care about equal rights for all in America than just the LGBT crowd. Just saying, you might try it sometime, it's enlightening.
That's a really cumbersome and expensive way to go about having children. From what I hear the surrogate method is about 100K+ per child all told. Of course that means that the gay couples who can afford it are generally wealthy, stable, and really want kids, so they make excellent parents. However, I would imagine that gay couples with children are an extreme minority because of that.
My intention was to include supporters as well. I should have written that.
In trying to protect their image to the LGBT crowd, they pretty much pissed off the entire crowd that watches the damn show.
You know gays can adopt, right? It's not just "extremely expensive surrogate method or nothing."
That's a really cumbersome and expensive way to go about having children. From what I hear the surrogate method is about 100K+ per child all told. Of course that means that the gay couples who can afford it are generally wealthy, stable, and really want kids, so they make excellent parents. However, I would imagine that gay couples with children are an extreme minority because of that.
Straight couples go this route all the time...but, you know...nobody has a problem with it. Nor do idiots who are against GM and Gays adopting children have any problem with all the heterosexual people who dump millions of unwanted children into the foster system.
It comes down to this.
If you were a company, would you want an employee while performing in the scope of their job duties, proselytizing and telling some of your customers they are the problem with the US or that since they are homosexual they are going to hell? Or that racism wasn't a problem prior to the Civil Rights movement?
And it's worth pointing out, gay people have a lot fewer instances of unwanted pregnancy than straight couples. There's very few gays who become accidental parents; they have to want it.
No one was intimidated.
You are a disgusting bigot btw.
a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance