IceBergSLiM
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,933
- 3
- 81
Logic fail, seatbelts and airbags both protect the person who bears the cost.
This whole line of thinking is a non-starter for you, it only makes you look foolish. You know that installing breathalyzers in every car would be a stupid idea, so arguing that the government's unwillingness to do exactly that as evidence of anything is not going to prove anything.
Headlights, blinkers, extend it every safety apparatus ever added to the original ford.
What is so stupid about it. Its hardly an inconvenience to blow into a tiny retractable dongle in your dashboard?
I think its hilarious I'm supporting an easily implemented no tolerance solution and getting ridiculed by the same people that have zero tolerance. Everyone must prefer more laws over better use of technology.
Last edited: