manowar821
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2007
- 6,063
- 0
- 0
Fucking awesome would be moving to 0.02%
I'd be all for that, hell yes.
Fucking awesome would be moving to 0.02%
fuck son you can't even type right. It's DRIVING, not DIVING.
fail...so full of fail.
I really don't care on penis size. That's something you are dealing with I guess.
When you finally moving out?
Fucking awesome would be moving to 0.02%
You're still wrong.You keep attacking me.
I didn't say google is bad, I said you just using google to try and trump everyone else is.
Your articles are part of the whole problem. Both lawyers and the MADD/SADD team...in reality most will not find their premiums raised by a simple DUI arrest.
Kill someone or wreck your car, then yes; expect a rate increase.
wait, let me drink 3 beers and i'll get back to you.You guys are insane. Do you even know what .08 feels like?
No, my point is that a "no tolerance" breathalyzer in a vehicle could be a potential problem for many reasons....emergency, safety, it could fail....then I'm stuck and can't go anywhere in my car, etc. 1 glass of wine with dinner is not drinking and driving.
Now if you are a repeat offender, then putting a no limit, or a .08 limit breathalyzer in a car is reasonable. But come on, do you honestly think it's right and good to put a no limit breathalyzer in cars? You can't have 1 beer with a buddy or 1 glass of wine with a nice meal? You're as bad as those who claim they can drive fine at a .15....just on the other end of the spectrum.
Breathalizer in every car is a retarded idea, simple reason is your mouthwash will set it off.
No, he doesn't think it's a good idea to put breathalyzers in every car. He's only arguing that point because he thinks it proves that the goal of DUI laws is to raise revenue, and therefore they are unjust.
I lost my mom because of douchebags like you making retarded decisions like that. I hope they hit you with the maximum penalty.
You're still wrong.
But you are seasoned, so you will attempt to debunk any article ever written about the penalty of increased insurance rates due to a DUI/DWI with your little message board quips.
Directly from a major car insurance company:
http://www.progressive.com/understanding-insurance/entries/2009/8/31/how_does_a_dui_affe.aspx
If your insurance did not increase after your DUI conviction you are one lucky bastard.
Which company?progressive is one company. Many do not...all state doesn't fault 1st offense.
You seem to think exceptions prove your point....there are many companies that do not fault 1st time DUI's without property damage.
This is why I follow my own rule of 1 drink/hour, up to a maximum of 4 drinks.
edit: Also, I'm all for DUI laws, but lets be realistic. The people blowing 0.08 aren't the ones causing the accidents. If people wanna drive drunk, they are gonna drive drunk regardless of what the law is. It's the people driving around at .2 who don't give a shit what the limit is who are causing all the accidents. You people act like if they dropped the limit to 0.02 that people would suddenly stop driving drunk.
Which company?
And LOL at you saying I use exceptions to prove my point when you are the one doing that.
There are SEVERAL major carriers that do not penalize.
All State is one, State Farm is another. There websites probably say differently due to exposure to the loonies like in this thread.
This is why I follow my own rule of 1 drink/hour, up to a maximum of 4 drinks.
edit: Also, I'm all for DUI laws, but lets be realistic. The people blowing 0.08 aren't the ones causing the accidents. If people wanna drive drunk, they are gonna drive drunk regardless of what the law is. It's the people driving around at .2 who don't give a shit what the limit is who are causing all the accidents. You people act like if they dropped the limit to 0.02 that people would suddenly stop driving drunk.
Mosh has presented evidence, you're provided anecdote. Guess who has more credibility right now.There are SEVERAL major carriers that do not penalize.
All State is one, State Farm is another. There websites probably say differently due to exposure to the loonies like in this thread.
Also keep in mind your own link says: "In fact, a DUI often directly impacts what you pay for auto insurance." Throughout that page they use "MAY" and "CAN BE"...
I am willing to bet a simple DUI arrest without accident/injury would not change a progressive rate other than perhaps if you were in their top notch policy. Progressive has several tiers.
come on... that is so weak. "their websites probably say differently". how the hell are you going to prove anything you've said???
sheesh, expected a least something from you.
Mosh has presented evidence, you're provided anecdote. Guess who has more credibility right now.
You guys are all a bunch of fucking RETARDS.
Shut the fuck up, none of ya'll are a reliable source on the matter.
wait, let me drink 3 beers and i'll get back to you.
Mosh has presented evidence, you're provided anecdote. Guess who has more credibility right now.