Originally posted by: Fallengod
Well right, all the newer ones. Is that true for older movies though? I have over 600 dvds, alot of which are older. Are the older ones going to have noticeable difference over dvds?
Originally posted by: Fallengod
Well right, all the newer ones. Is that true for older movies though? I have over 600 dvds, alot of which are older. Are the older ones going to have noticeable difference over dvds?
SourceThe study indicated a 35mm negative has a resolution in excess of 2400 lines by picture height but obviously we don?t watch negatives, the film has to be processed into a stock reel. Those tested stock reels were found to have a maximum comparative line resolution of 1400 lines P/H, still considerably more resolution than 1080p?s vertical integer. (Note: the P/H formula is used because film has the same vertical and horizontal resolution, where video does not.)
Originally posted by: Fallengod
Well right, all the newer ones. Is that true for older movies though? I have over 600 dvds, alot of which are older. Are the older ones going to have noticeable difference over dvds?
Originally posted by: UnklSnappy
Originally posted by: Fallengod
Well right, all the newer ones. Is that true for older movies though? I have over 600 dvds, alot of which are older. Are the older ones going to have noticeable difference over dvds?
Yes even very old movies like Casablanca and Mutiny on the Bounty look better than they ever have. Probably haven't looked this good since they were shown in a theater.
HD really shines when your you're projecting to a 100+" screen.
Originally posted by: Extelleron
All the new HD-DVD/Blu-Ray movies are rendered in 1080p and have much better image quality than DVD, which is rendered in 480p.