Malak. Go read my original post in this thread. I didn't go around calling you ignorant. You're the one who started the insults in this thread, which I didn't respond back in kind. I merely said who cares about DX10's release because I don't believe it will have any significant presense as far as game wise goes until 2008. That's two years off. Nothing you have posted has contradicted this. In fact, you post that the game you are interested in (which you never name) is hiring people for development of that game. That means that they are just now starting to do development work. You mention that this mysterious game you are so excited about is now hiring people for development. That means that until a full team is assembled, there is a limited amount that they can do to make the game. Even after a team is fully assembled it is going to take roughly two years or so to get the game finished. This is going by a schedule shorter than the 3 year development cycle for a single game that has been stated by multiple industry insiders from both the console and the PC side of gaming development. This would point to you invalidating your own belief that DX10 will have any impact on the gaming world for at least two more years as most believe.
There is a world of difference between putting out a tech demo as Crytek did and putting out a full fledged game. Even if a games company is developing a DX10 game right now (or let's say Jan'06) on pre-final specs it would still take them until '08 to make any attempt at a decent game or at least one that makes good use of the feature set of DX10 and is not merely a slightly enhanced DX9 game. A tech demo can be whipped up in almost no time, especially if the artwork is already available. A full game is a more difficult beast and takes a long long time in todays gaming industry. We all know a game can be put out in a years time but those are usually sequels or yearly updates (Madden NFL for instance). However, for new games, a 1 year to 1.5 year development cycle would point to either a very simplistic game by todays standard (making it a bad candidate for DX10) or one that is full of bugs and missing features (making it a game you wouldn't want).
For the first generation of DX10 video cards to have any impact it'd the game would have to be out by the first half of 2007. Because I'm sure by roughly mid 2007 we will have another update cycle to our video cards. That means whatever game you're interested in has to be out in the first half of 2007 for the first generation of DX10 cards to have any impact. This is a far fetched scenario. Thus, who cares about DX10 at this time. Anyone who looks at it would figure the late 2007 video card release (likely the 3rd DX10 card releases) will be the ones that would be worth getting as far as looking for DX10 compliance goes.
This topic has been covered many times before in this section of the AT forums and like I said, there have been at least 3 threads covering just this topic in the last couple of months.
Malak, your attitude is as bad or worse than some of the people you're criticising and you say you're explaining things but you're ignoring everything everyone has said about why DX10 will have no impact until 2008. Nothing you have said so far has changed anyone's mind that DX10 will have no significant impact until 2008. The only thing you've done is raised my curiosity about this supposedly mysterious game you keep mentioning but never name. And lastly, you starting the name calling is a good way to present your case about the video forums being as bad as P&N.