Or he was lying. I'm not a fan of trying someone in the court of public opinion without a fair trail.
You realize that eight months before Dylan made her allegations, Woody Allen was already in therapy over "inappropriate behavior" towards her?
25 different people in recorded interviews said that Woody was obsessed with Dylan and could not "keep his hands off her."
Fantastic take him to court then.
shouldn't be surprising. look at polasky (however you spell it). so many in hollywood defend him and make excuses.
I don't understand why you are so hell-bent on defending a pedophile, but the statute of limitations has already run. All Dylan can do is remind people who this guy really is.
She is now a married adult woman. She said that she had PTSD from the sexual assault. You can't get PTSD from your imagination. So either she is lying or she is telling the truth.
If she is lying, you have to ask yourself why she would subject herself to worldwide scrutiny to make false accusations, especially since she has otherwise completely shunned the spotlight. She changed her name and lived in relative obscurity for the past decade or two. Use what brain you have and think it through.
It's messed up.
I believe her.
And Allen actually tried to get the charges against Polanski dropped:
http://www.tvguide.com/News/Scorses...?rss=breakingnews&partnerid=imdb&profileid=01
To be honest that petition was signed by more than 100 artists...
The ... at the end implies something. What are you implying? That since he is in the middle of a crowd it doesn't count?
That if you decide to go down the road...
he signed the petition ----> he is a pedophile
...then basically you are saying all those people, more or less a who's who of cinema on both sides of the Atlantic, are pedophiles.
No one in their right mind would make that connection just because someone signed a petition. Not sure if you've noticed but there are a number of additional connections with Allen that might make one lean more towards that conclusion.
That is one of the most bizarre things I've ever heard anyone say. And even though she's a huge lib, she's generally a smart and somewhat logical person - which just made that statement that much more bizarro world.Polanski was not guilty of 'rape-rape', says Whoopi Goldberg.
'We're a different kind of society, we see things differently,' actor says in defence of Roman Polanski.
Whoopi's right you know.
You didn't think that the laws apply to everyone did you?
Uno
LOL Point.the creepy rapey nerd guy is again accused of being a creepy rapey nerd guy.
shit.
you know...Italy, now THEY have a fucked up justice system, right?
:hmm:
So do I, the fact that he married his own adopted daughter as soon as she was of legal age speaks for itself, he's a creep and a pedophile, period.
This gives me an uncomfortable feeling as well. Marrying his stepdaughter and sort of adopted daughter. And that the age difference is 56 - 19 = 37 years.
This gives me an uncomfortable feeling as well. Marrying his stepdaughter and sort of adopted daughter. And that the age difference is 56 - 19 = 37 years.
#1: Soon-Yi was Woody’s daughter. False.
#2: Soon-Yi was Woody’s step-daughter. False.
#3: Soon-Yi was Woody and Mia’s adopted daughter. False. Soon-Yi was the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow and André Previn. Her full name was Soon-Yi Farrow Previn.
#4: Woody and Mia were married. False.
#5: Woody and Mia lived together. False. Woody lived in his apartment on Fifth Ave. Mia and her kids lived on Central Park West. In fact, Woody never once stayed over night at Mia’s apartment in 12 years.
#6: Woody and Mia had a common-law marriage. False. New York State does not recognize common law marriage. Even in states that do, a couple has to cohabitate for a certain number of years.
#7: Soon-Yi viewed Woody as a father figure. False. Soon-Yi saw Woody as her mother’s boyfriend. Her father figure was her adoptive father, André Previn.
#8: Soon-Yi was underage when she and Woody started having relations. False. She was either 19 or 21. (Her year of birth in Korea was undocumented, but believed to be either 1970 or ’72.)
#9: Soon-Yi was borderline retarded. Ha! She’s smart as a whip, has a degree from Columbia University and speaks more languages than you.
#10: Woody was grooming Soon-Yi from an early age to be his child bride. Oh, come on! According to court documents and Mia’s own memoir, until 1990 (when Soon-Yi was 18 or 20), Woody “had little to do with any of the Previn children, (but) had the least to do with Soon-Yi” so Mia encouraged him to spend more time with her. Woody started taking her to basketball games, and the rest is tabloid history. So he hardly “had his eye on her” from the time she was a child.
"Legitimate rape"?
I suppose she means there is consent (but not technically legal if underage) versus non consent.
Mia Farrow herself was 21 when she married then 50 year old Frank Sinatra.
And from the article linked in an earlier post:
That article reveals very interesting details and little-known facts regarding the very public allegations of sexual child abuse against Woody Allen. One mention explains why, to my eyes, Ronan Farrow looks a lot more like Ol' Blue Eyes than Mr. Allen. I know it sometimes comes across as if one is approving of the alleged heinous crime and blaming the victim when one believes in people being innocent until proven guilty by a thorough exercise of justice, not Internet hearsays and mob vengeance, but that is where I stand on the matter. As was said in Babylon 5, "the devil is in the details". There are many victims here, for a long time still I think, but two bads a good do not make. Anyway, some might think the substance of that article is tainted by the professional relationship the author had with Mr. Allen but folks here can read the details and judge for themselves rather than perpetuate nonfacts and ambiguities and judge people based on the oh-so-common on the Internet 'he looks creepy and therefore must be a pedophile".
Except when it isn't. And not even a sort of adopted daughter, either. So there's that.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/27/the-woody-allen-allegations-not-so-fast.html
Sounds like Mia was a quite a bit less than truthful all around. And Dylan don't know Jack about it, either.
But as is often the case on the internets, crap is often sold as truth and facts be damned.