Why does everyone suggest using the BIOS to overclock instead of this, or why not a combination of both? I don't get it.
One thing I've noticed with EasyTune is it allows for smaller memory multipliers, meaning I don't have to overclock my memory as much. The BIOS only goes to 2.5, so my memory is at stock speed at only 2.88GHz with a 320MHz FSB from 2.4GHz (I have an E6600).
I would think that being able to keep the memory speed the same is advantageous, as I only purchased memory rated at 800MHz, and there is probably quite a bit of headroom left with the CPU, because voltage is still stock.
If someone could shed some light on the situation, then please lemme know.
One thing I've noticed with EasyTune is it allows for smaller memory multipliers, meaning I don't have to overclock my memory as much. The BIOS only goes to 2.5, so my memory is at stock speed at only 2.88GHz with a 320MHz FSB from 2.4GHz (I have an E6600).
I would think that being able to keep the memory speed the same is advantageous, as I only purchased memory rated at 800MHz, and there is probably quite a bit of headroom left with the CPU, because voltage is still stock.
If someone could shed some light on the situation, then please lemme know.