No one can be stupid enough to believe this crap right?
Seems we have at least one gullible sucker on the board.
Now, about the poor old doctor's "unwarranted" prosecution about his "wonder cure", it seems to me, after reading and watching all this crap (and I remember him from his mid-1980's grandstanding), his persecution stems from selling unapproved drugs as a cure for a disease.
Amazingly, doing just that has been against the law in the U.S. for almost 100 years, which is why we don't have drug store shelves lined with the old patent medicines any longer.
But I guess the OP is just oblivious to that fact....to sell a drug as a cure for a disease in this country, it has to be approved for sale by the FDA. And the FDA even helps researchers get their drugs/concoctions approved for sale, esp. with the fast track approval system that was set up decades ago.
And this doesn't even touch on the fact the doctor's manufacturing facility at his "research facility" failed to meet the minimum requirements laid down by the FDA for pharmaceutical manufacturing....I guess just another way to keep the poor doc down, although all drug manufacturers have to meet the minimum standards for manufacturing drugs. Guess since the doctor is an "alternative" researcher, these standards shouldn't apply to him like they apply to every other drug manufacturer in this country. Guess he's just too special to follow the standards and guidelines required of everyone else.
But I suppose to a layperson, the poor old doctor's pleas in his movie do sound logical and overwhelmingly reasonable. To someone with a tad of a medical/science background, much of his history and lack of success is troubling.
Why does he refuse to partake in testing using established standards? His clinical trials, if my reading is correct, shows that he just picks and chooses what he'll follow in setting up trials despite rigid rules being in place for these trials. (The rules and regulations are there because of many past faux pas in testing and approving drugs that eventually made it to consumers, only to find out later that the drugs either really didn't work or had such devastating side effects that the drug should never have made it to market...thalidomide is one example.)
Instead, he seems to only want to test his way, trying to shortcut and sidestep the procedures that do, in fact, help protect consumers from the worst of the quack or ineffective or dangerous drugs on the world market.
As to his patents being stolen....that comment just made me laugh. I did read most of the patents the OP linked and followed the poor doctor's patents that were cited within the main patent applications, and almost in every case, the poor old persecuted doctor's patent that was cited was only remotely applicable to the main patent, and usually only because the doctor had described a method of distilling something out of another substance, usually urine. So, in essence, what does appear is the researcher physician who was citing the poor persecuted doctor's patents was doing so only to cover any similarity in methods involved with distilling substances, be they human or synthesized.
I found not one patent from one researcher that was identical or even similar to any work done by the poor, persecuted doctor.
And as for his assertion that he's millions of dollars in debt......guess that's why the gullible people are spending upwards of $200K a year for his treatment....I seem to remember an average of $10K/month as a figure being quoted as the cost for his "treatment".
And where are all his cured patients? I see prior patients of his dying and their survivors lamenting their loss....wonder why they were all dying of the same cancers that the poor, persecuted doctor supposedly cured? Guess his "cures" only work as long as the patient's wallets have money in them....as it seems the patients run out of money long before any cure happens.
Wait.....I hear something.
Quack....quack......quack......
When it smells like a fraud, walks like a fraud, talks like a fraud, it adds up to be a fraud. (And let's not bring up the fact that the poor, old misunderstood persecuted doctor has actively engaged in fraud against insurance companies by having patients and himself represent and file insurance claims for his "treatments" as being chemotherapy while the treatments are at best experimental drug therapies, something most insurance companies won't cover except under unusual circumstances. That's why clinical trials are held....to determine if the drug works. Once that's done, and the drug/treatment's approved, the ins. co's. usually fall right into line and approve payment for treatment, instead of having to cheat, lie, and fabricate facts to get the ins. co's. to pay for the drug/treatment.)
I put him into the same category as the chelation therapy "cure" for heart disease proponents from the '70'snd '80's that had just as much success as he's having.....zero. Then again, as they say, even a blind squirrel gets lucky and finds an acorn once in a while, and so even with this quack, errrrr, doctor, soemtimes it appears he gets lucky with someone actually surviving and the doctor gets the credit.....even when the cancer is a very easily cured/survivable cancer, like his "miracle cured" bladder cancer victim.
(Bladder cancer is one of the most easily treated and survived cancers out there, so getting his bladder cancer survivor to parade around, touting the poor, persecuted doctor's miracle cure holds absolutely no water at all. Who knows, the cancer may have gone into spontaneous remission by itself....it happens more than you think.)
Honestly, if his cure is that good, why the steadfast refusal over the decades to engage in real, double blind studies to see if his cure works? I know they're hard, costly, and time consuming, but the payoff at the end can be tremendous. To refuse really sets off alarm bells and waves red flags......justly, in my opinion.