I am not a troll but just someone who has opinions that are far more different from others and people will disagree with me.
The government does many evil things, they lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident to go into Vietnam. The point is that the FDA is government controlled and they are paid off by big business to shut down the competition. The drug cancer industry would lose money so obviously they would shut down the threat.
I am not a troll but just someone who has opinions that are far more different from others and people will disagree with me.
Yet again, I find it difficult to determine if you are trolling, or are a combination of stupid and stubborn. Read through this thread - there is more than enough abundant information to see that the point of view that you're expressing is obviously incorrect.
Drug companies are against vaccines and cures for HIV for the same reason. They want to make money off people who need their drugs for life. Not one time cures that make little long term profit.
Drug companies are against vaccines and cures for HIV for the same reason. They want to make money off people who need their drugs for life. Not one time cures that make little long term profit.
Yep, b/c there have been no cures developed ever. And no one would want to make billions and billions of dollars. If you knew the failure rate for drugs, a company would rather fail and go bankrupt than make billions based on this ignorance.
They are making billions more with these endless treatments, a cure would cost them billions.
FYI drug companies WANT more and more people to be infected with HIV, the more HIV infected people their are the happier these drug companies are. They love sick people, sick people make them lots of money.
LOL. And no they aren't. Come to my company(Oncology Pharmaceutical) and ask the scientist and researches who have lost love ones if they don't want to find a cure.
This is the problem with folks like you. Talking out of your ass.
Drug companies do not like cures, they like life long treatments. This is why they could be against something like this.
If you have a patient that will need chemo drugs for the rest of their life, which could be 10 to 20 more years vs one that only needs a drug for a few months, you would prefer the life long drug. Lots more money.
I have a co worker with a slow incurable cancer, who will require chemo for the rest of their life. There is no way they would develop a cure for her, because they are now making money off her until she dies.
Drug companies are against vaccines and cures for HIV for the same reason. They want to make money off people who need their drugs for life. Not one time cures that make little long term profit.
They are making billions more with these endless treatments, a cure would cost them billions.
FYI drug companies WANT more and more people to be infected with HIV, the more HIV infected people their are the happier these drug companies are. They love sick people, sick people make them lots of money.
Some scientist might want to find a cure, but the executives who control everything don't, they want the opposite more sick people, would be surprised if secretly some HIV drugs are designed with a hidden function to make HIV spread more easily. Or cancer drugs that make sure some people have relapses or never experience full remission. These companies want people sick
Also to be clear I am NOT saying these things are FACTUALLY TRUE, only that it is a possibility.
I hope you're happy now. Look at all the tinfoil nutcases you lured in with this necro thread!I thought we went over this. There is not all end cure for cancer. The movie I Am Legend told me
Yet again, I find it difficult to determine if you are trolling, or are a combination of stupid and stubborn. Read through this thread - there is more than enough abundant information to see that the point of view that you're expressing is obviously incorrect.
Also to be clear I am NOT saying these things are FACTUALLY TRUE, only that it is a possibility.
So just making things up then?
I think you meant to say "drug companies" not "government".Can you provide examples of all of these cures that were sequestered by the government?
Anyways, marriage-jee-wanna.
:sneaky:
I love how everyone on this forum labels you as a lunatic if you even mention a "conspiracy theory" as if the govt is a noble and trusting organization.
The same people who are destroying this country in front of our eyes. They are all paid off, I would never doubt them doing something shady like this, proof or no proof.
The govt is just the hand of the corporations and that includes drug corporations. And incase you didn't know, corporations exist solely to make money. They are considered "people" yet if you analyze their behavior as you would with a real person, they would be labeled as a sociopaths because these people have no liability and nothing to fear other than a slap on the wrist fee for breaking the rules.
Also to be clear I am NOT saying these things are FACTUALLY TRUE, only that it is a possibility.
Some scientist might want to find a cure, but the executives who control everything don't, they want the opposite more sick people, would be surprised if secretly some HIV drugs are designed with a hidden function to make HIV spread more easily. Or cancer drugs that make sure some people have relapses or never experience full remission. These companies want people sick