Most games are using at best 2-4 cores, if we start using at least 6 (I think that's what the game devs can use on the consoles), things will look better for AMD, BUT, better doesn't mean better than Intel... as much as Intel is mostly limited to 4 cores, the per core performance is much higher, and I don't believe any other optimization for Jaguar would really help with Piledriver? or would it?
also, pure PC games like some crazy demanding RTS or mmos will still probably keep depending more on core performance.
also, don't be fooled by GPU bound test, or limited testing, there are far to many games were a 3.4GHz Sandy Bridge i5 can beat/match a 5GHZ 8350 (and at a similar clock, even on the AMD favorite Crysis 3 "welcome to the jungle" scene it's comparable, while much faster on the rest of the game) to not see the obvious, i5 offers better gaming performance for the same or less money, and I don't see it changing dramatically, so I wouldn't start recommending 8350s over Haswell i5s for gaming, things really only start looking bad for Intel when you start going to dual core territory... so Haswell i3 might have a hard time competing with the 6300 for future games, but, who knows...
in terms of PC ports, I think I would be more concerned about the memory optimization for the consoles?