Einstein and his theories are DEAD WRONG

[SaltyNuts]

There are so many holes in his theory its amazing. Just to name a couple:

1. E = MC^2 right? Well, a photon has no mass. So then it should have no energy if that equation is right. However, we walk outside and photons warm our skin. So they must have energy, and the equation is quite obviously dead wrong. How can no one have caught this by now?

2. Einstein says that a clock moving at a high velocity (but no acceleration) will tick slower than a clock moving at a low velocity. HOWEVER, he also says someone or something in a high velocity environment but under no acceleration could not even tell, or prove, that he or it were in a high velocity environment - they might as well be in a low velocity environment. Those to are completely contradictory.

Am I the only one that things about these things? Seriously. When his equations and theories are formally declared wrong, remember, you heard it here first.

 

[nerp]

You're wrong. Sorry.

 

[TheGardener]

Isn't this just a repeat of another thread?

Yes, you are the only one that things about these things.

 

[zinfamous]

Well, it's about fucking time. More than 8 decades of meticulous scientific studies, experimental investigations, and thousands and thousands of peer-reviewed papers couldn't do what AT member Salty Nuts has done in a single bath salts-inspired post from his suburban garret. You have managed to prove Einstein wrong.

Congrats, man. Can I buy you a beer?

 

[Ken g6]

1. E = MC^2 right? Well, a photon has no mass. So then it should have no energy if that equation is right. However, we walk outside and photons warm our skin. So they must have energy, and the equation is quite obviously dead wrong. How can no one have caught this by now?

Photons have no rest mass. I suppose they're called massless because they have no intrinsic mass. Their energy is the only thing that gives them any mass.

2. Einstein says that a clock moving at a high velocity (but no acceleration) will tick slower than a clock moving at a low velocity. HOWEVER, he also says someone or something in a high velocity environment but under no acceleration could not even tell, or prove, that he or it were in a high velocity environment - they might as well be in a low velocity environment. Those to are completely contradictory.

Yeah, inertial reference frames are weird. Imagine two people in two rockets going by each other, in opposite directions, not accelerating. Each one thinks the other's clock is running slow. And they're both right in their own inertial reference frame.

 

[SSSnail]

I called the Nobel office, and they said they don't give out prizes for crazies.

 

[nakedfrog]

Well, it's about fucking time. More than 8 decades of meticulous scientific studies, experimental investigations, and thousands and thousands of peer-reviewed papers couldn't do what AT member Salty Nuts has done in a single bath salts-inspired post from his suburban garret. You have managed to prove Einstein wrong.

Congrats, man. Can I buy you a beer?

I'll see your beer and raise you a hand job.

 

[Imp]

Jesus!

 

[BurnItDwn]

What next, you are going to tell me some guy crammed 2 of each animal on a boat and that the earth is 3000 years old?

 

[deustroop]

Am I the only one that things about these things? Seriously. When his equations and theories are formally declared wrong, remember, you heard it here first.

I thing about things two but I can never get it rite.

 

[TheGardener]

I called the Nobel office, and they said they don't give out prizes for crazies.

They seem to think that Bob Dylan will bow on one knee. The Nobel prize people will be calling him crazy if he doesn't.

 

[TheGardener]

I'll see your beer and raise you a hand job.

Is this SaltyNuts lucky day or what?

 

[nakedfrog]

That's a great question.

 

[BoomerD]

What next, you are going to tell me some guy crammed 2 of each animal on a boat and that the earth is 3000 years old?

Dude...don't be stoopid...the earth is 6000 years old, not 3000. I know this because Jeezus told me so in person when he appeared on my french toast.

 

[OutHouse]

Op, are you taking your first physics class?

 

[Red Squirrel]

Particle physics is basically magic.

Source: I have a theoretical degree in physics.

 

[sandorski]

ATOT, the ultimate Science Peer Review.

 

[KillerBee]

I wonder how much dumber Einstein would have been if he had grown up with the internet available?

 

[BurnItDwn]

Dude...don't be stoopid...the earth is 6000 years old, not 3000. I know this because Jeezus told me so in person when he appeared on my french toast.

Ohhhh French Toast!

I love exotic foreign foods like french toast!

I last talked to Jesus last week. He is the rollout coordinator for one of my projects. The guy does good work.

 

[BoomerD]

Ohhhh French Toast!

I love exotic foreign foods like french toast!

I last talked to Jesus last week. He is the rollout coordinator for one of my projects. The guy does good work.

I'm glad to see he's doing better. He used to mow my lawn.

 

[BurnItDwn]

I'm glad to see he's doing better. He used to mow my lawn.

I dont know if rollout coordinator is "doing better" vs Mowing lawns.

These kids come and do my lawn and they seem to really love their work.
http://www.weadickbrothers.com/page2

 

[IndyColtsFan]

What next, you are going to tell me some guy crammed 2 of each animal on a boat and that the earth is 3000 years old?

DUH, everyone knows the Earth is 6,000 years old and Noah only had to put a few dinosaurs on the Ark, not all the species. FFS.

 

[BurnItDwn]

DUH, everyone knows the Earth is 6,000 years old and Noah only had to put a few dinosaurs on the Ark, not all the species. FFS.

Yes, naturally they only need a small sample of the species and they can bring the dwarf varieties. Makes perfect sense.

What about the androids and robots though? How did their species all survive the flood. MACHINES SUFFER FROM OXIDATION!!! THINK OF THE MACHINES!

 

[Iron Woode]

There are so many holes in his theory its amazing. Just to name a couple:

1. E = MC^2 right? Well, a photon has no mass. So then it should have no energy if that equation is right. However, we walk outside and photons warm our skin. So they must have energy, and the equation is quite obviously dead wrong. How can no one have caught this by now?

2. Einstein says that a clock moving at a high velocity (but no acceleration) will tick slower than a clock moving at a low velocity. HOWEVER, he also says someone or something in a high velocity environment but under no acceleration could not even tell, or prove, that he or it were in a high velocity environment - they might as well be in a low velocity environment. Those to are completely contradictory.

Am I the only one that things about these things? Seriously. When his equations and theories are formally declared wrong, remember, you heard it here first.

wow, I haven't seen this much stupid in a while.

at least you're not posting links to infowars or natural news.

general relativity is a pretty easy concept to grasp. How you managed to fail is pretty sad.

 

[mxnerd]

Calculating the Energy of a Photon (given wavelength)