Elevating the atheism/religion discussion

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
Taking of life being the operative phrase, I find no moral or ethical difference between the two. Coming from someone who believes they are created in G-d's image is truly sad. Most people find it unjust as well.



Pray tell what is this date? And don't weasel out with the oft-stated Christian talking point <paraphrase> "None may know the time and day of his return" crap.



God created Satan knowing full well what Satan would do and chose to ignore it.

Face it, you worship an unloving and unjust deity. I know that doesn't concern you and yet again, that is truly sad!

Matt 25:13 tells us we won't know the "day and hour", after Jesus used a parable.

Secondly, I nor any serious Christian cares about what you think about the God we worship as your opinion is one of perhaps thousands.

You don't have to worship him/it anyway. Move on to something that matters.
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
Matt 25:13 tells us we won't know the "day and hour", after Jesus used a parable.

Secondly, I nor any serious Christian cares about what you think about the God we worship as your opinion is one of perhaps thousands.

You don't have to worship him/it anyway. Move on to something that matters.

Still resorting to Christian talking points, eh? We've been hearing about Jesus' second coming for roughly <checks watch> 2,000 years. And the chances against it happening are dwindling every minute.

Seriously? There are millions of atheists/agnostics in this country alone; worldwide, easily tens of millions. Educate yourself since you're trying to save the "sinners".

You're right, I don't. But we do have to put up the insanity that is Christianity and it's need(obsession) with saving the world.. I truly do care about your mental health, Rob, which is why I continue to participate in these threads. You must think it matters as well since you're a constant participant.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Taking of life being the operative phrase, I find no moral or ethical difference between the two. Coming from someone who believes they are created in G-d's image is truly sad. Most people find it unjust as well.



Pray tell what is this date? And don't weasel out with the oft-stated Christian talking point <paraphrase> "None may know the time and day of his return" crap.



God created Satan knowing full well what Satan would do and chose to ignore it.

Face it, you worship an unloving and unjust deity. I know that doesn't concern you and yet again, that is truly sad!


This is something that I have found very interesting. The christian god seems so uncaring, in fact he seems like a real dickhead. The Egyptian pharaoh kept the Israelites as slaves so he, among other things, kills every first born male in the kingdom.

At midnight the LORD struck down all the firstborn in Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh, who sat on the throne, to the firstborn of the prisoner, who was in the dungeon, and the firstborn of all the livestock as well. (Exodus 12 29)

So, if we take this at face value, people who had absolutely nothing at all to do with what was happening lost a son if they had a male child. I know I'm just a human and don't think like god (even though I was made in his image, he's known me since before I was born, etc.) but that seems pretty extreme to me... killing random kids just because. Feel god's love!

I mean, there is a LOT of evil in this book:

http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm

Will jackstar7's question ever be answered?
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
Still resorting to Christian talking points, eh? We've been hearing about Jesus' second coming for roughly <checks watch> 2,000 years. And the chances against it happening are dwindling every minute.

"A thousand years is a day to God" - 2 Peter 3:8. Two-thousands years to Him is less than a week.

lol

Seriously? There are millions of atheists/agnostics in this country alone; worldwide, easily tens of millions. Educate yourself since you're trying to save the "sinners".
My point is nearly all Christians say God is loving, nearly zero atheists think so.

Colour me shocked!

You're right, I don't. But we do have to put up the insanity that is Christianity and it's need(obsession) with saving the world.. I truly do care about your mental health, Rob, which is why I continue to participate in these threads. You must think it matters as well since you're a constant participant.
We have to put up with a lot of things in this country...this is the US, a melting pot of belief and religion, irreligion and so on.

So what?

You're not being forced to listen to Christians....there is no state-sponsored religion (e.g Church of England), so just deal with it. We have to deal with the craziness of atheism, as you can see with the 911- memorial cross protest started by the American Atheist.

Stop whining.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
Everyone uses their beliefs to shape public policy. Everyone believes in something. Don't be such a baby. Even an atheist has some sort of beliefs about how things should be run and what is right and wrong. You can be delusional and kid yourself but everyone has an idea about how we should run things. It is called an opinion and everyone has one.


Sure and there are things I believe other people object to because of their beliefs. Its not being a baby about it, its highlighting when I feel the need to live and let live and when I feel the need to voice my opposition.

Some atheists always voice their opposition, I choose to only do so when I am impacted in some fashion.

I have lots of Christian friends, my kids have friends of faith and we get along wonderfully. Up and until their kid tells my kid they are going to hell and then I have to explain why there is no evidence hell exists outside of dogmatic human beliefs.
 

PingviN

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2009
1,848
13
81
You're not being forced to listen to Christians....there is no state-sponsored religion (e.g Church of England), so just deal with it. We have to deal with the craziness of atheism, as you can see with the 911- memorial crossprotest started by the American Atheist .

In no way Christianity is forced onto those that don't want any part in it. A memorial cross is a totally neutral symbol, not Christian at all. And it wasn't sponsored by the NY state either. Totally not state-sponsored religion.
 
Last edited:

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
"A thousand years is a day to God" - 2 Peter 3:8. Two-thousands years to Him is less than a week.

lol

My point is nearly all Christians say God is loving, nearly zero atheists think so.

Colour me shocked!

We have to put up with a lot of things in this country...this is the US, a melting pot of belief and religion, irreligion and so on.

So what?

You're not being forced to listen to Christians....there is no state-sponsored religion (e.g Church of England), so just deal with it. We have to deal with the craziness of atheism, as you can see with the 911- memorial cross protest started by the American Atheist.

Stop whining.

Consider the root of beliefs and their purpose.

A belief is the manifestation of a person giving meaning to something.
Nothing has meaning until we attach meaning to something, when we do so we create a belief. Thats it in a nutshell, whether its a Christian God or the belief you are going to get a job you want. its all based on the meaning we have given events in our life. often times we derive that meaning by proxy because of those around us, that's why we have more than one major religion in the world. because cultural and tribal influences affect the meaning we give events.

Now examine why must humans to do this? what evolutionary gains do we get by giving meaning to events that transpire in life?

1. I believe that saber tooth cat wants to eat me, its a belief I have derived
based on events in my life, cultural, tribal influence. It allows me to make faster decisions because I have experience to draw from, so I know to run right away vs sit around and see what the cat is going to do. It also allows us to foster the social aspect of our DNA. religion is literally no different or anything else we believe for that matter.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
I wanted to expand further on my opinions to better highlight my views.

I believe that most people on earth want to be happy and given that life can be difficult sometimes being happy all of the time is difficult.
Whether you derive purpose and Joy from God or from licking a woman&#8217;s toes, what counts in the end is you are finding Joy in an otherwise difficult world and if in doing so you are not hurting other people then more power to you.

I think that when I challenge those beliefs or belittle them I am frankly pissing on your Joy and have a negative effect on your happiness and would therefore be violating my &#8220;Not hurting other people&#8221; clause.
And ultimately when you hurt other people and piss on their happiness what you are really doing is messing with your own.

Consider happiness the destination and as long as your journey to get there is messing with other people I don&#8217;t care what path you take.

I will leave you all with this exercise and it can apply to any belief at all be it religious or anything else.

1. Does the belief bring you Joy &#8211; if the belief you hold does not bring you joy I encourage you to examine the meaning you have attached things in your life that have led to this belief, then understand that events that occur have ZERO meaning until you give them meaning and often we give the wrong meaning to events that lead to beliefs and at the very least most events can have multiple meanings
2. Does the belief hurt other people - If they do hurt other people you really need to take a look at their pain and determine why its hurts and respect the fact that it does and act accordingly.

An example of my own &#8211; I have always been an over achiever type and very competitive, I always told myself its because I&#8217;m just a hard worker and good. Being an over achiever often times leads to hurt to myself or other people so I was forced to take a look at the beliefs that surround the behaviors. What I uncovered was a deep sense of inadequacy by years of not feeling like I was good enough, this was caused by events in my life that on their own didn't mean much but I had chosen they meant certain things.

When you understand that a belief is just something we have derived by giving meaning to events, you are free to examine other meanings or to reconcile that events really don&#8217;t have meaning. When you do this you free yourself from the beliefs and in the case of self limiting beliefs this can be the most FREEING thing to occur in someone&#8217;s life.

You can also choose meanings that make you happy vs. hurt you.

When someone says its all a matter of perspective this is at the heart of that statement as what you perceive is the reality you create for yourself.

So for me being an atheist isn&#8217;t about removing God from people&#8217;s lives, I don&#8217;t think a world without God is the perfect world. It&#8217;s a way I choose to have control over my own happiness as I am the one that&#8217;s has complete control over it.
For others the idea that there is something bigger than themselves they can lean on for meaning or support brings Joy and happiness.

In the end in both scenarios the destination is being happy SO don&#8217;t piss on others Joy.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
Consider happiness the destination and as long as your journey to get there is messing with other people I don’t care what path you take.

I assume you meant "not messing with other people".

I disagree. Supporting an ideology that does bad makes you part of the problem. So most Nazis did not personally kill anyone, still they were part of the problem.
If you are religious you are also part of the problem of fundamentalism be it creationists or suicide bombers.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
If you are religious you are also part of the problem of fundamentalism be it creationists or suicide bombers.
If you are an Atheist who has it in for those who are religious and feel it is your path in life to educate the religious...then you are also part of the problem!!
There are many Atheists who live and let live and only speak up when somebody comes along uninvited and starts to pound them over the head with their religion or the Bible!
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
I assume you meant "not messing with other people". -- that`s correct!

I disagree. Supporting an ideology that does bad makes you part of the problem. <-- not at all! It`s my ideaology how am I part of the problem?These are more atheist talking points...explain how that is a problem fore the world or for others??
So most Nazis did not personally kill anyone, still they were part of the problem. <-- that's not the same...you are being misleading. Most likely because you have no good example!
If you are religious you are also part of the problem of fundamentalism be it creationists or suicide bombers.
Sorry there are plenty of Atheists who are also part of the problem!!If there is a problem!
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
This is something that I have found very interesting. The christian god seems so uncaring, in fact he seems like a real dickhead. The Egyptian pharaoh kept the Israelites as slaves so he, among other things, kills every first born male in the kingdom.

At midnight the LORD struck down all the firstborn in Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh, who sat on the throne, to the firstborn of the prisoner, who was in the dungeon, and the firstborn of all the livestock as well. (Exodus 12 29)

So, if we take this at face value, people who had absolutely nothing at all to do with what was happening lost a son if they had a male child. I know I'm just a human and don't think like god (even though I was made in his image, he's known me since before I was born, etc.) but that seems pretty extreme to me... killing random kids just because. Feel god's love!

I mean, there is a LOT of evil in this book:

http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm

Will jackstar7's question ever be answered?

Ah but we mustn't take things out of context. We must examine that phrase within the context of the whole OT. Seen from within that context it becomes clear that OT G-d really was a dick. Oh...wait...
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
"A thousand years is a day to God" - 2 Peter 3:8. Two-thousands years to Him is less than a week.

lol

My point is nearly all Christians say God is loving, nearly zero atheists think so.

Colour me shocked!

We have to put up with a lot of things in this country...this is the US, a melting pot of belief and religion, irreligion and so on.

So what?

You're not being forced to listen to Christians....there is no state-sponsored religion (e.g Church of England), so just deal with it. We have to deal with the craziness of atheism, as you can see with the 911- memorial cross protest started by the American Atheist.

Stop whining.

Christian "timekeeping"...lol.

Maybe, just maybe, zero atheists think G-d is loving because they don't think G-d exists. Jus' saying.

Translation: Rob's part of the majority culture so nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah.

You're kidding, right? Every hour of every day we are assaulted with the symbols, images, words and culture of Christianity. Really, Rob you should get out more. No state-sponsored religion? Face it guy, a lot of our laws, mores and attitudes are Christian-based. Not to hard to see that. Yes, atheism has extremists; even you would admit that a relative few do not and should not represent the whole.

The irony of that statement should be apparent.

Please do continue to follow the letter of the word and not the spirit.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
I assume you meant "not messing with other people".

I disagree. Supporting an ideology that does bad makes you part of the problem. So most Nazis did not personally kill anyone, still they were part of the problem.
If you are religious you are also part of the problem of fundamentalism be it creationists or suicide bombers.


This is my thought on it pretty much exactly.

Sure, if someone wants to pray to an invisible friend in their home, and that gives that person hope and they function better in society, who am I to say anything?

Except that this keeps propagating what appears to be a dangerous myth. Many people in this country can't have equal rights, mostly due to the christian right. And in other countries, it can be just plain dangerous. Do we really want to discuss whether tax dollars should be used to teach creation in public schools in this age or science and reason? I think it is important to remember how christianity really was before science backed it into a corner and exposed it for what it really is, how people were treated under it's rule when it had power.

Many christians argue that without god we can't have morals, we can't know what is truly right from wrong. Do we really want the bible to be the moral guide for people? A god that pushes for genocide and murder? A god that says rapists should marry the rape victim? A god that kills children (and adults) by the thousands if not millions? I don't want that.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
Christian "timekeeping"...lol.

It is what it is.

Maybe, just maybe, zero atheists think G-d is loving because they don't think G-d exists. Jus' saying.
Of course, which was my point.

Translation: Rob's part of the majority culture so nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah.

You're kidding, right? Every hour of every day we are assaulted with the symbols, images, words and culture of Christianity. Really, Rob you should get out more. No state-sponsored religion? Face it guy, a lot of our laws, mores and attitudes are Christian-based. Not to hard to see that. Yes, atheism has extremists; even you would admit that a relative few do not and should not represent the whole

This is not Iraq or Afghanistan....you can change the laws, you can positively affect culture change and you can get people to help you do this, and you don't have to worry about being killed for it here in America.

I just think its very disturbing how you are being more whiny about the "Christian culture" and yet you're probably not active in your community or in the political realm to change things.



Likewise, every single day we as a society are assaulted with violence on TV and the promotion of violent video games, movies, etc. At the very least, Christians organize to change these things because they see it as a cultural problem. They are not sitting on their proverbial ass and whining on internet forums.

I personally am not an activist in that cause, but I don't sit and whine about it either.
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
It is what it is.

Of course, which was my point.



This is not Iraq or Afghanistan....you can change the laws, you can positively affect culture change and you can get people to help you do this, and you don't have to worry about being killed for it here in America.

I just think its very disturbing how you are being more whiny about the "Christian culture" and yet you're probably not active in your community or in the political realm to change things.



Likewise, every single day we as a society are assaulted with violence on TV and the promotion of violent video games, movies, etc. At the very least, Christians organize to change these things because they see it as a cultural problem. They are not sitting on their proverbial ass and whining on internet forums.

I personally am not an activist in that cause, but I don't sit and whine about it either.

So I'm whiny because in a country where Christianity is the majority religion I point out how our government is rife with biblical laws or the verbal assault people receive from the overly zealous Christians? Got it.

While not an everyday activist I do write letters and emails to my state and federal representatives about issues ranging from proposed bills to insert the government and/or zealous Christians between a woman and her healthcare provider to environmental protection from companies who think nothing of polluting our groundwater and rivers/streams to peoples rights to apply for jobs or welfare without having their credit/drug/backgrounds checked as a precondition to employment or financial assistance.

But please, do tell me more about my non-involvement in politics.

Please tell me you're not asinine enough or support the ill-informed opinion that there is a causative relationship between violent media and the relative few who commit violence; or between sexualized media and teen sex and pregnancy. If Christians or a member of any other religion has a problem with violent/sexualized media and its many formats, there's an incredibly simple (and to some absolutely mind boggling) solution: change channels/websites/theatres and or turn them off.

Funny, that's the exact way I view Christians.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
So I'm whiny because in a country where Christianity is the majority religion I point out how our government is rife with biblical laws or the verbal assault people receive from the overly zealous Christians? Got it.

Yes, you're whining, and YOU can help facilitate change...YOU can do something about it. After reading your following remark, good thing you're doing something, but change doesn't happen overnight.

I am totally against Biblical laws in our Laws, but I'm not a political activist...so I am willing to deal with it.

Please tell me you're not asinine enough or support the ill-informed opinion that there is a causative relationship between violent media and the relative few who commit violence; or between sexualized media and teen sex and pregnancy. If Christians or a member of any other religion has a problem with violent/sexualized media and its many formats, there's an incredibly simple (and to some absolutely mind boggling) solution: change channels/websites/theatres and or turn them off.
My point is that they're championing change if they see a problem. Whether or not there are links to violence in media and violence in society is immaterial to the point I wanted to make -- that solving problems means you need to organize, and organizing solves problems.

See: Civil Rights Movement and Gay Rights Movement.

Funny, that's the exact way I view Christians.
Good for you.
 

crashtestdummy

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2010
2,893
0
0
Yes, you're whining, and YOU can help facilitate change...YOU can do something about it. After reading your following remark, good thing you're doing something, but change doesn't happen overnight.

I am totally against Biblical laws in our Laws, but I'm not a political activist...so I am willing to deal with it.

My point is that they're championing change if they see a problem. Whether or not there are links to violence in media and violence in society is immaterial to the point I wanted to make -- that solving problems means you need to organize, and organizing solves problems.

See: Civil Rights Movement and Gay Rights Movement.

Good for you.

To some extent, participating in a public discussion of the topic IS doing something about it. We can protest in the streets, write to our senators, file suit against oppressive laws, but in many cases these things won't convince the other side. The difficulty in being a minority is that the more you organize, the more you are seen as a threat.

Honestly, the best thing we can do is be "out" in our daily lives. As I hinted at when I mentioned hypothetical polling a while ago, the numbers reflect a fear of the unknown quantity. I'm going to guess that a lot more religious people know atheists than realize it, because these people hide (or simply don't mention) their identity. But once someone is able to say to themselves, "I know Sally. Sally's an atheist, but she's also a moral person with a family, and doesn't seem to be a threat to my way of life" it becomes much easier to empathize with atheists' desire to not have religion be a part of secular law.

Depending on where you live and the life you lead, being "out" in this way can still be scary. In the north east where I live, it's pretty easy, but even I don't walk into synagogue wearing a sign saying "I'm an atheist." Particularly where it concerns my wife's professional development, I have to be careful about when and how I disclose such information. Certainly, anyone I consider a close friend (including my Rabbi) knows that I'm an atheist, but that's a bit different than the kind of "out" I was referring to being in the above.
 
Last edited:

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
To some extent, participating in a public discussion of the topic IS doing something about it. We can protest in the streets, write to our senators, file suit against oppressive laws, but in many cases these things won't convince the other side. The difficulty in being a minority is that the more you organize, the more you are seen as a threat.

Disclaimer: I don't see atheists as a threat, personally, but as was mentioned earlier, I can understand why religious people view them as one...particularly when it comes to their freedom to practice religion.

Just a side note, I was watching Religilous -- the Bill Maher anti-religious documentary, and at the very end, the amount of fear-mongering he was
espousing was shocking as he seemed to compare the tolerance of religion (specifically Islam) with tolerating nuclear war. Sure, he doesn't represent atheism as a whole, but the ones with the biggest mouths are the biggest idiots.

That being said, I can understand to some degree how atheism can be viewed as a threat, but to me, they're just people with a different world-view that what I have.

Honestly, the best thing we can do is be "out" in our daily lives. As I hinted at when I mentioned hypothetical polling a while ago, the numbers reflect a fear of the unknown quantity. I'm going to guess that a lot more religious people know atheists than realize it, because these people hide (or simply don't mention) their identity. But once someone is able to say to themselves, "I know Sally. Sally's an atheist, but she's also a moral person with a family, and doesn't seem to be a threat to my way of life" it becomes much easier to empathize with atheists' desire to not have religion be a part of secular law.
I don't need a qualifier to accept an atheist for who he/she is. In fairness, I think atheists are unfairly criticized, however, I also think part of that comes from the intolerant "New Atheists" that are completely anti-religious.

If they said the same things about blacks or Jews as they say about religious people, then they'd be called exactly what the really are; bigots.

For the record, I do not want religion as a part of secular law, but I think we're missing the bigger picture. If you look at history, this all started when Christianity became Rome's State Religion, and henceforth, Christians feel obligated to enshrine their beliefs into law since its been that way for so long.

I'd say educating the coming generation on the history of this monumental mistake will do a lot more good for a longer period of time than simply demanding religion be ousted from Government.
 
Last edited:

PingviN

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2009
1,848
13
81
If they said the same things about blacks or Jews as they say about religious people, then they'd be called exactly what the really are; bigots.

Jews are religious people.

Blacks, well, there is a pretty big difference between racism and calling religious people stupid. The color of your skin is one thing, believing the world is 6000 years old and God creating man out of clay is another. I don't think black people who are religious get off any easier than white.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
I don't need a qualifier to accept an atheist for who he/she is. In fairness, I think atheists are unfairly criticized, however, I also think part of that comes from the intolerant "New Atheists" that are completely anti-religious.

If they said the same things about blacks or Jews as they say about religious people, then they'd be called exactly what the really are; bigots.

For the record, I do not want religion as a part of secular law, but I think we're missing the bigger picture. If you look at history, this all started when Christianity became Rome's State Religion, and henceforth, Christians feel obligated to enshrine their beliefs into law since its been that way for so long.

I'd say educating the coming generation on the history of this monumental mistake will do a lot more good for a longer period of time than simply demanding religion be ousted from Government.


Rob, I don't speak out against christianity in discussion forums because I am a bigot. I speak out because the doctrine is evil and there is zero evidence to believe in it. A lot of people who speak out against christianity (and religion) used to be christian, I certainly fall into that category. If all black people had their own handbook that called for and approved of the atrocities the bible does, chances are people would have something justly to speak out against in that case as well. You're stretching here, big time.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
Jews are religious people.

Blacks, well, there is a pretty big difference between racism and calling religious people stupid. The color of your skin is one thing, believing the world is 6000 years old and God creating man out of clay is another. I don't think black people who are religious get off any easier than white.

The remarks are bigoted, which is my point. Calling someone stupid for being atheist is the same as calling someone stupid for being gay.

You're focusing on one aspect of a person, and extrapolating from there.
 

crashtestdummy

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2010
2,893
0
0
Disclaimer: I don't see atheists as a threat, personally, but as was mentioned earlier, I can understand why religious people view them as one...particularly when it comes to their freedom to practice religion.

Just a side note, I was watching Religilous -- the Bill Maher anti-religious documentary, and at the very end, the amount of fear-mongering he was
espousing was shocking as he seemed to compare the tolerance of religion (specifically Islam) with tolerating nuclear war. Sure, he doesn't represent atheism as a whole, but the ones with the biggest mouths are the biggest idiots.

That being said, I can understand to some degree how atheism can be viewed as a threat, but to me, they're just people with a different world-view that what I have.

I don't need a qualifier to accept an atheist for who he/she is. In fairness, I think atheists are unfairly criticized, however, I also think part of that comes from the intolerant "New Atheists" that are completely anti-religious.

If they said the same things they say about blacks or Jews as they say about religious people, then they'd be called exactly what the really are; bigots.

There are always the extremes. Frankly, if every atheist were like Bill Mahr, then religious people should view all atheists as a threat. Just the same way that if every religious person were like Rick Santorum, atheists should view all of them as a threat.

Thankfully, that's not the case, but it can seem that way when our only exposure to these people are the loud, extreme voices. That's why it is important for us to introduce ourselves to others as atheists and explain our beliefs. No to try to convert them to atheism, but simply to show that we're reasonable people.

For the record, I do not want religion as a part of secular law, but I think we're missing the bigger picture. If you look at history, this all started when Christianity become Rome's State Religion, and henceforth, Christians feel obligated to enshrine their beliefs into law since its been that way for so long.

I'd say educating the coming generation on the history of this monumental mistake will do a lot more good for a longer period of time than simply demanding religion be ousted from Government.

More important than the fact that the mistake was made is why it was a mistake in the first place. A significant portion of America, when faced with the history of religious incorporation into secular government, would simply reply, "that's only natural, because religion is the moral foundation of society, and without it laws make no sense." Understanding that a moral society can exist without religious involvement was something obvious to our nation's founders, but is still contested by much of its populace.
 

crashtestdummy

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2010
2,893
0
0
Jews are religious people.

Judaism is in the interesting place of being as much an ethnicity and a culture as an organized religion. Jews were oppressed not just because of their religious beliefs, but also because they were ethnically and culturally different than those around them. This may sound like a minor difference, but you were also being pedantic, so I get to return the favor.

Blacks, well, there is a pretty big difference between racism and calling religious people stupid. The color of your skin is one thing, believing the world is 6000 years old and God creating man out of clay is another. I don't think black people who are religious get off any easier than white.
There's a difference between calling someone wrong and calling someone stupid. The former is an argument on topic, the other is an ad hominem characterization. The intelligence level of the people making the claim has little baring on whether the claim itself is correct.

If you really wanted to make that claim (because, I don't know, you're a real jerk), you'd have to look at data outside the argument itself. Even those studies, though, are mostly influenced by demographic differences. When you control for income and education level, they don't show a strong relationship between religiosity and intelligence.
 

Retro Rob

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2012
8,150
108
106
Rob, I don't speak out against christianity in discussion forums because I am a bigot. I speak out because the doctrine is evil and there is zero evidence to believe in it.

This is a lie:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_biblical_figures_identified_in_extra-biblical_sources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artifacts_significant_to_the_Bible

If you mean "no evidence" of miracles, well, no stuff Sherlock...as no one ever said evidence of miracles exists as they are supernatural in nature.

Over the past 100 years or so, evidence for Biblical accounts have been found. I expect more to be found in the future.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |