Elon Musk now owns 9.2% of twitter...update.. will soon be the sole owner as Board of Directors accepts his purchase offer

Page 283 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,262
5,259
136
Worst case, it might be like diesel gate where they have to offer to buy back vehicles. Honestly, I imagine most people would keep theirs.

Unfortunately no. They are testing 70 MPH highway range against the EV EPA combined numbers, so most EVs come up short when you do that. It's an Apples vs Oranges comparison.

Though the "diversion team" stuff is really slimy.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,516
13,090
136
Unfortunately no. They are testing 70 MPH highway range against the EV EPA combined numbers, so most EVs come up short when you do that. It's an Apples vs Oranges comparison.

Though the "diversion team" stuff is really slimy.
The part about the software not reporting facts is the deal breaker.
If you fuck with the software to make you look better than you actually are, you go to jail.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: dank69

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,794
10,321
136
Unfortunately no. They are testing 70 MPH highway range against the EV EPA combined numbers, so most EVs come up short when you do that. It's an Apples vs Oranges comparison.

Though the "diversion team" stuff is really slimy.
I get that you won't always hit epa numbers. EVs are still subject to similar limitations as ICE vehicles in that ambient conditions (speed, temperature, grade) will make a massive difference.

But a whole team dedicated to obfuscating range concerns from customers and the software behind it says that they're lying, and actively defrauding customers.

But even if a class action suit is successful, I don't see it doing a ton of damage to Tesla. I find it difficult to imagine any EPA penalties would be very stiff, unlike diesel gate with active defeat of emissions regulations) and any required customer buy-back would probably see limited acceptance of an offer. So maybe Tesla gets hit for $100M? 200M? Nothing like the $20B that VW got hit by
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,262
5,259
136
I get that you won't always hit epa numbers. EVs are still subject to similar limitations as ICE vehicles in that ambient conditions (speed, temperature, grade) will make a massive difference.

But a whole team dedicated to obfuscating range concerns from customers and the software behind it says that they're lying, and actively defrauding customers.

But even if a class action suit is successful, I don't see it doing a ton of damage to Tesla. I find it difficult to imagine any EPA penalties would be very stiff, unlike diesel gate with active defeat of emissions regulations) and any required customer buy-back would probably see limited acceptance of an offer. So maybe Tesla gets hit for $100M? 200M? Nothing like the $20B that VW got hit by

Again, not seeing any evidence they are reporting anything other than the EPA numbers. The EPA is not going to bust them for reporting EPA numbers.

Even if they cheated on the EPA numbers it's a slap on the wrist. There won't be buybacks. It has happened numerous times. The worse case I remember is hyundai where it was a fairly systematic "error" that had them overstating MPG on a bunch of cars.

The problem here is I don't think they are cheating. It's well known that Tesla is taking advantage of an alternate (but officially approved) EPA test method that gives more optimistic results. It's scummy that they do this, but it's an EPA approved option.

This video explains what Tesla is doing different, than what most others are doing, that gives them more inflated results:

IOW, they don't need to cheat, because EPA gives everyone the option to take a longer easier test...

Alex, doesn't blame Tesla, but the EPA. He's half right. I blame them both. EPA should make everyone take the same test for more comparable results, but shame on any manufacturer taking the easy version to inflate their numbers.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,516
13,090
136
At this point I'm beginning to think that Russia has kompromat material on Elon.
I am beginning to think that Elon needs an actual ass whoopin'. To no ones surprise though he is backing out of the fight vs Zuckerberg. Cause he a bitch.
 
Reactions: nakedfrog

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,834
10,235
136
Again, not seeing any evidence they are reporting anything other than the EPA numbers. The EPA is not going to bust them for reporting EPA numbers.

Even if they cheated on the EPA numbers it's a slap on the wrist. There won't be buybacks. It has happened numerous times. The worse case I remember is hyundai where it was a fairly systematic "error" that had them overstating MPG on a bunch of cars.

The problem here is I don't think they are cheating. It's well known that Tesla is taking advantage of an alternate (but officially approved) EPA test method that gives more optimistic results. It's scummy that they do this, but it's an EPA approved option.

This video explains what Tesla is doing different, than what most others are doing, that gives them more inflated results:

IOW, they don't need to cheat, because EPA gives everyone the option to take a longer easier test...

Alex, doesn't blame Tesla, but the EPA. He's half right. I blame them both. EPA should make everyone take the same test for more comparable results, but shame on any manufacturer taking the easy version to inflate their numbers.
The EPA needs to massively update their testing in general, and manufacturers should no longer be able to self certify the numbers.
 
Reactions: pmv

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,262
5,259
136
The EPA needs to massively update their testing in general, and manufacturers should no longer be able to self certify the numbers.

Agreed. They need a massive update. The current test is aimed at ICE cars.

The reason EPA give a more favorable adjustment if you run the full 5 cycles, is that the additional tests have more low speed test, that would make ICE results worse, so they compensate with the more favorable adjustment, but for an EV this is reversed, since it does better at lower speed, so the 5-cycle gives improved results, and then they still give a more favorable adjustment factor. That's just nuts. It's basically a loophole that isn't working as intendended.
 

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
23,778
4,963
146
I am beginning to think that Elon needs an actual ass whoopin'. To no ones surprise though he is backing out of the fight vs Zuckerberg. Cause he a bitch.


Let's get Swalwell and Zuckerberg vs Mccarthy and Elmo in a tag team match.
 
Reactions: dank69

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,834
10,235
136
Agreed. They need a massive update. The current test is aimed at ICE cars.

The reason EPA give a more favorable adjustment if you run the full 5 cycles, is that the additional tests have more low speed test, that would make ICE results worse, so they compensate with the more favorable adjustment, but for an EV this is reversed, since it does better at lower speed, so the 5-cycle gives improved results, and then they still give a more favorable adjustment factor. That's just nuts. It's basically a loophole that isn't working as intendended.
Really highway should just be 70 mph on an interstate, using E10 gas for ICE. The current highway test doesn't reflect the vast majority of highway driving at all. It also causes manufacturers to optimize for much lower speeds than the vast majority of highway miles are done at.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,262
5,259
136
Really highway should just be 70 mph on an interstate, using E10 gas for ICE. The current highway test doesn't reflect the vast majority of highway driving at all. It also causes manufacturers to optimize for much lower speeds than the vast majority of highway miles are done at.

Agreed again. I note that this is exactly what most third party testing does.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,752
34,630
136
Tesla has been lying about their range for years, and then provides shit customer service, who could've guessed that?


Tesla's extremely poor customer service is a major reason my husband sold his Model 3. They canceled appointments on him with no explanation. The final time he got it fixed (by 3rd party) he directly wheeled it across the street from the shop to the VW dealer and traded it on an ID4.

I interacted with their energy division for our solar array and powerwall orders for our old place. Only marginally better service.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,262
5,259
136
Back to Twitter. I just noticed his latest tactic to mess with non account holders. You can now view twitter accounts again, but when I do that, all I see are old tweets.

I kept a bookmark to kopite7kimi since he was an accurate NVidi leaker. I could just click his main page and see his latest tweets.

Now I click it and see his tweets from 2022, with no way to reorder them to see the latest ones.

I guess the theory is if he makes Twitter unusable enough for non-account holders, they will have to sign up?
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,009
4,369
136

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
96,112
15,761
126
Reactions: dank69

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,860
20,182
136
It's the perfect launch for x, now it's fully musk's dream. Of course he starts off by letting a Nazi back on
 

RnR_au

Golden Member
Jun 6, 2021
1,811
4,429
106
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |