Thread merge with the other title would be better!Repost. Please lock.
Look at speedy, couldn't start his own thread fast enough. You're right, of course, as soon as discovery begins Trump's team will drop this, but their goal is already accomplished - speedy and his ilk have their nonsensical rage boners.yup yup. watch how quickly they drop it, but it's all part of the plan anyway. Snowflake a bunch of noise, the chuds will hear it once and determined that its the story all the time, never caring to follow up, never caring if the suit is legit, if the article is legit.
Meh, make the troll do the work of reposting his shit posts in the other thread.Thread merge with the other title would be better!
yup, I got tired of his crap and so put speedy on ignore.Look at speedy, couldn't start his own thread fast enough. You're right, of course, as soon as discovery begins Trump's team will drop this, but their goal is already accomplished - speedy and his ilk have their nonsensical rage boners.
This is all not to mention the fact that Trump is perhaps the most public figure on the planet which certainly raises the bar with regard to proof of damage.
typical trump move, I don't think the Times will fold like most of those that were the target of trump suits, they have the funds to defend themselves and trump will hate discovery if he doesn't drop it before it gets that far.
I hope the Time and WaPo make it front page news when Trump does drop the suit.typical trump move, I don't think the Times will fold like most of those that were the target of trump suits, they have the funds to defend themselves and trump will hate discovery if he doesn't drop it before it gets that far.
they should counter-sue and not drop when trump does.I hope the Time and WaPo make it front page news when Trump does drop the suit.
Did anyone think that the Covington kid's suit had any merit?
Fortunately for the covington kid he had a different legal standard which worked toward his favor since private individuals need only establish that the publisher acted with "negligence."Did anyone think that the Covington kid's suit had any merit?
Here’s a good post about the lawsuit in case anyone here wants to laugh at Trump some more.
Trump Sues New York Times (He will Lose Quickly) - New York Personal Injury Law Blog
Trump Sues New York Times (And Will Lose Quickly)www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com
Speedy, how do you feel about the fact that the response to this is just everyone laughing and laughing at Trump? Even better, if he sticks with it the NYT will just discovery tap dance all over him, making it even funnier. Does it bother you how dumb he seems to be?
Addendum: I think both Trump and his lawyer Charles Harder know this suit is dead in the water. Because if it was viable, Trump would be subject to a deposition. Trump. Under oath. About Russia. And there is zero chance of Trump allowing that to happen.
I'm sure one of speedys YT longhairs (excuse me, aggregators) covered this well known point, no?Fortunately for the covington kid he had a different legal standard which worked toward his favor since private individuals need only establish that the publisher acted with "negligence."
The United States Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that a public figure plaintiff must establish what is known as “actual malice.” To show actual malice, the person who published the statement either had to have known that the statement was false, or published it with reckless disregard despite awareness of the probable falsity. The existence of actual malice must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.
Thread merge with the other title would be better!
But conservatives hate frivolous lawsuits.
I'm 100% not in any way knowledgeable about how this all works first off. But is there a chance that Trump is hoping that he may take this all the way to the Supreme court, where his installed cronies can overturn NYT versus Sullivan?
I'm 100% not in any way knowledgeable about how this all works first off. But is there a chance that Trump is hoping that he may take this all the way to the Supreme court, where his installed cronies can overturn NYT versus Sullivan?
There isn't a conservative on the planet that knows what an op-ed is.Guess he does not know what an OP ED is.
...