You can't bullsh*t engineering exams or projects. If you don't come up with the right solution or at least the right path to a solution, you don't get credit. If your project doesn't work, you don't get credit. One of my engineering professors put it to my class this way: "the immediate costs of replacing defective hardware are astronomical - you can't just issue patches willy nilly like those CS people" (and I was one of those CS people!)
Political Science & Humanities folks can bullsh*t a lot since most of it seems to be subjective. At the undergraduate level it seems like most people in humanities fields do a lot less work than people in engineering simply because they can get away with not doing all the reading, and because papers don't require the painstaking debugging that software and hardware requires.
Political Science & Humanities folks can bullsh*t a lot since most of it seems to be subjective. At the undergraduate level it seems like most people in humanities fields do a lot less work than people in engineering simply because they can get away with not doing all the reading, and because papers don't require the painstaking debugging that software and hardware requires.