Eric Garner all over again

[ch33zw1z]

More evasiveness and invective. Could anyone answer the question?

Haha, you do this in the abortion conversations also, conjure up obvious over the top hypotheticals / hypotheticals you would never support and demand answers. Well, whose demanding now. Fuck off troll, nobody's asking you to call them master. The fact you even use that as your hypothetical further reinforces how tone deaf you are.

 

[ch33zw1z]

Quite frankly, if you can't see why the question is ridiculous on its face, you're not equipped to have an honest discussion.

Honest discussions are not his thing.

 

[Viper1j]

We go by white. What kind of dumb fucking question is this?

I think he wants you to refer to him as an "European-American".

 

[MixMasterTang]

I better leave this thread before I get banned for saying something to a certain someone who is either a total racist or a total retard. Ciao!

 

[brycejones]

I think he wants you to refer to him as an "European-American".

Based on his responses here I would classify him as sub-species "White Trash".

 

[pcgeek11]

All of a sudden you care about the Poor's, how nice. I'm sure you'll stop voting for people that dont tho, right?

This is sad.

 

[shortylickens]

WELL!

This thread is going splendidly!

 

[DrunkenSano]

WELL!

This thread is going splendidly!

With the way some people are posting, it's like they are proudly showing off their white hoods for all to see. Seeing that there is significant movement now due to increased awareness, protests (sorry, they're riots in the eyes of racists), and potential progress being made in all spheres of our society and daily lives, this combination is apparently alarming to certain people.

 

[ch33zw1z]

This is sad.

It's truly is. You behavior time and time again is apalling.

 

[pauldun170]

Chappelle with a few words

 

[SMOGZINN]

Yes, exactly. Therefore groups do not have the sole right to determine the terms used to describe them. The party which must refer to them in that way has a say as well.

It seriously shouldn't take this much grief to prove one lousy and obvious point.

I honestly don't have a facepalm gif big enough to deal with this response.
Each group gets to demand that the terms that they want to use is the one used. Then those competing terms will battle it out in the marketplace of ideas, and the winner will be the group that is willing to pay the most of it.
I highly suggest you go out in the world and start demanding that people refer to you as Master. See how that goes. It is your right to demand. The question is can you survive that demand. And that is why one group has the sole right to determine the terms used to describe them, because they are willing to pay the price to make that determination. They payed for it in blood, and will continue to do so. Because it is that important. How important is it to you to be able to use the racist terms you prefer to call them?

 

[repoman0]

I can’t believe there are people in the world who are as incapable of understanding nuance as Atreus21. Goddamn what a simpleton.

 

[ivwshane]

He’s using same tired argument people used to stop progress against anything. Gay marriage?!! We can’t have that! It’ll lead to people wanting to marry their pets! Abortions?! We can’t have that!! Women will start having abortions up to the due date of their baby!

It’s a dishonest argument from people who have no real argument to counter progress.

It’s the slippery slope fallacy.

 

[cytg111]

Trump trying to un-salad "when the looting begins the shootings starts" and ends up with a triple salad.

Trump responds to Milley apology for Lafayette Square photo op

President Trump, in an extensive interview with Fox News, said he's "fine" with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley's move to express regret for accompanying the president during a photo op last week at Lafayette Square -- while defending his own actions that day.

www.foxnews.com

These ass lickers though.

 

[pauldun170]

I didn't realize there was more to this

Black Lives Matter: 'How can we win?' Monopoly analogy explained

Kimberly Jones explains the impact that centuries of economic hardship has had on black Americans.

www.bbc.com

 

[cytg111]

Antifa did it....... wait

https://twitter.com/x/status/1271819615660900352

 

[hal2kilo]

I can’t believe there are people in the world who are as incapable of understanding nuance as Atreus21. Goddamn what a simpleton.

One trick pony's are quite limited.

 

[cytg111]

Chappelle with a few words

Brilliant.

Also

 

[zinfamous]

Yes, exactly. Therefore groups do not have the sole right to determine the terms used to describe them. The party which must refer to them in that way has a say as well.

It seriously shouldn't take this much grief to prove one lousy and obvious point.

you make this argument because you also believe that you have some right to name biological processes as whatever you want them to be, despite actual defined biological terms, and relevance. It is the same problem.

You need, as an outside group, the "right to name things how you want them to be named,"--how you need them to be named--otherwise your entire "moral framework" falls into an empty pool of indefensible, broken logic. (you require things that aren't life be called life, otherwise your religion can't keep you mucking around inside women's uteruses; you require social groups be named the groups you want them to be named, otherwise you have to accept your lifelong racism.)

You need to defend this reasoning because you have nothing else. Yes, you are already dwelling in that empty pool of nonsense, and everyone else knows it, but you still fight these fights because you can't tolerate the fact that the world that exists is not the one that you wish to live in. You must convince yourself of this, otherwise you have no purpose in life.

I get it, that's a tough pill to swallow. But that isn't our problem. It's yours.

 

[zzyzxroad]

Brilliant.

Also

I just posted a thread for 8:46. Though it deserved one.

 

[zinfamous]

Chappelle with a few words

"Just shut up and joke, funny man!"


/some people in this thread, probably

 

[zinfamous]

I just posted a thread for 8:46. Though it deserved one.

yes, it is making the rounds today.

 

[zzyzxroad]

yes, it is making the rounds today.

The single lumens confeterate loving crowd are going to hate it because... what can they say. They are not smart enough to come up with ways to try and knock it.

 

[Viper1j]

Lots and lots of food stamps...

Coming to a cop near you!

 

[JEDIYoda]

you make this argument because you also believe that you have some right to name biological processes as whatever you want them to be, despite actual defined biological terms, and relevance. It is the same problem.

You need, as an outside group, the "right to name things how you want them to be named,"--how you need them to be named--otherwise your entire "moral framework" falls into an empty pool of indefensible, broken logic. (you require things that aren't life be called life, otherwise your religion can't keep you mucking around inside women's uteruses; you require social groups be named the groups you want them to be named, otherwise you have to accept your lifelong racism.)

You need to defend this reasoning because you have nothing else. Yes, you are already dwelling in that empty pool of nonsense, and everyone else knows it, but you still fight these fights because you can't tolerate the fact that the world that exists is not the one that you wish to live in. You must convince yourself of this, otherwise you have no purpose in life.

I get it, that's a tough pill to swallow. But that isn't our problem. It's yours.

Please somebody tell me that Atreus21 is not a born again Christian.....