I would actually argue she has as much success as she is enjoying now because this happened to her.
so when a female teacher sleeps with a boybecause you're not supposed to tell strangers what rooms other people are in?
so when a female teacher sleeps with a boy
there is no violation to any rule
because i do not see anyone sue the school!?!??!?
If she's better off now, she should owe them money
we're talking about a hotel, not a school. try again.
and whats the difference
in both cases people work on them
in both cases people broke the rules
so they are similar
you try again
and whats the difference
in both cases people work on them
in both cases people broke the rules
so they are similar
you try again
and the hotel is in wrong why!?!??!?!?!?!
why not sue the America president then
it is he fault the schools failed to give moral to the person that worked in the hotel and caused the problem
unless that person has do the same thing in the past and somehow kept his job then yes the hotel are in charge
if that person goes to church lets sue also the church
and the list can go on
you can not held a company responsible for the morality of employes
thats why america is so fucked up
lets fuck the hotel for no good reason it happens
lets punish a company that steals the people and do illegal stuff
never happens
Amen brother.
Corrupt individuals should be held accountable, not the corp. for malfeasance. If this was a 2 * B&B, this $$$ lawsuit wouldn't have been worth anyone's time.
Lawyers for the Los Angeles Unified School District have reached a settlement in which the district is agreeing to pay a total of nearly $140 million to dozens of students of Miramonte Elementary School who had filed a civil lawsuit against the district over its handling of the sexual abuse case of former Miramonte teacher Mark Berndt
Companies are responsible for the actions of their agents.
So if you own a small car repair shop and you just hired a guy.
So if you own a small car repair shop and you just hired a guy. And he starts to deal drugs and then YOU get sued for that loser's illicit activities (since you have money and your employees doesn't), do you actually feel then that it's correct for people to sue you for some asshole's stupidity?
It's pretty obvious that these financial lawsuits would be tremendously minimalized if everybody had no money. Only the ones with money are laser locked to a stupid lawsuit from some scheister Better Call Saul ambulance chasing lawyer who talks a good game and is able to influence a gaggle of mouth breathing jurors to side against you with aggressive prejudice.
if he's dealing drugs out of your business then yes your business should be liable to a degree.
and you're a moron for hiring a drug dealer, let alone one that deals drugs from your business.
It's unfair to be held accountable for the secret activities of others if you followed all proper protocol (clean background checks) when hiring and adhere to all state guidelines in properly operating your business.
So if your employee leaves offsite and deals drugs during his lunchtime and then you get a fast talking ambulance chasing lawyer throw a "spin" and sue you for whatever and you're fine with that, then you're a chump, b/c that's wholly unfair.
And that goes back to my original point. No money. No lawyers suing for $$$. Lawyers play craps with innocent people's lives b/c they CAN. Sometimes it pays off big and that's what they're banking on, just b/c they know how to file the lawsuit form with the local court.
It's unfair to be held accountable for the secret activities of others if you followed all proper protocol (clean background checks) when hiring and adhere to all state guidelines in properly operating your business.
So if your employee leaves offsite and deals drugs during his lunchtime and then you get a fast talking ambulance chasing lawyer throw a "spin" and sue you for whatever and you're fine with that, then you're a chump, b/c that's wholly unfair.
If someone looking like a deliver dude walked up to the counter and asked for someone's room number i'd expect most places to also just hand it out.
This was a retarded decision.
How about all the other less famous victims of voyeurism in private places? How much of the $55 million do they get?
If someone looking like a deliver dude walked up to the counter and asked for someone's room number i'd expect most places to also just hand it out.
Creepy dude at front desk: "Hey, can you tell me what room Erin Andrews, the famous hottie sports celeb, is staying in and can you give me the room directly next to hers?"
Front desk: "Yes, absolutely!"
I think this guy had done this repeatedly, as well, but probably not only at Marriot? Needless to say, that is exactly what happened here where the video was recorded.
How are they not in some way culpable?
because you're not supposed to tell strangers what rooms other people are in?
Except that is not what happened. He found an unattended house phone in the restaurant that guests are not supposed to use. I believe it was the one at the reservation desk while the hostess was seating someone. It is quite common for these phones to be used to contact guests staying at the hotel. He then called the Operator and asked to be connected to her room. The phone then displays the room number which is a common setup. He hangs up. He heads up to that floor. He sees the room nearby is being cleared out - goes down to the front desk and asks for that room.
He did originally ask to be in a room near hers but the hotel did not do that nor did they ever explicitly tell him what room she was in