Originally posted by: kindest
lol they fixed it
Originally posted by: Anubis
I'm willing to bet that very few people noticed that. I didn't until this threat and yes it earlier before it was changed.
Originally posted by: Anubis
I'm willing to bet that very few people noticed that. I didn't until this threat and yes it earlier before it was changed.
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: Anubis
I'm willing to bet that very few people noticed that. I didn't until this thread and yes it earlier before it was changed.
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Hmmmm.
KT
Originally posted by: Arcadio
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Hmmmm.
KT
Please tell me you get the reference.
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Arcadio
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Hmmmm.
KT
Please tell me you get the reference.
He got the reference, but a few people failed spelling.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
so what did the headline say??
Please explain it to us, Supernintendo Chalmers!Originally posted by: Arcadio
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Hmmmm.
KT
Please tell me you get the reference.
Originally posted by: Arcadio
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
Topic Title: ESPN Headline writers failed English?
Topic Summary: That's upossible.
Hmmmm.
KT
Please tell me you get the reference.
Originally posted by: EKKC
they're "jocks" so you "nerds" can be the grammar police
i have a love/hate relationship with espn.