RussianSensation
Elite Member
- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
So this is the new "Omega" version that was leaked..
Some major changes, but the important one was the rumored performance boost.
I think the focus on this one is ease of use and functionality, not performance.
The UI for managing game specific profiles is much easier to navigate now.
Per game overclocking is going to be much easier to manage.
There is a unified panel for controlling VSR/FreeSync functionality on a per display basis in Eyefinity.
It's essentially just streamlining the ease of us by allowing the user to manage IQ vs. performance and video settings per specific application. The interface is better catered for new gamers entering PC gaming. I guess this interface will be easier/appeal more to console gamers trying to move into PC gaming for the first time.
Also the app no longer relies on .NET, unlike CCC. The speed of navigation/start-up of CCC has been a criticism of it for a while. I mean gamers for years have criticized CCC, and now AMD provided a change that's almost like a hybrid between GeForce Experience (catering to console gamers turned PC gamers, the demands for social media integration), while retaining some of the core CCC functionality.
As far as AMD's performance driver optimizations, I still think their biggest issues with Fiji are hardware bottlenecks. It could be related to DX11 API though but by the time DX12 games start coming out, they'll have 16nm GPUs already. I guess Fiji was a guinea pig for HBM and AMD making a 596mm2 die gave them confidence that they can in fact design Big die chips. I think where their drivers need more work is on the crossfire side, not for single GPUs. Looking at GCN performance vs. Fermi/Kepler/Maxwell in the last 3 years, AMD has produced superior single GPU drivers vs. NV as far as performance is concerned. That's why the Crimson's focus is on functionality, not performance.
The biggest takeaway for me is with Radeon Technologies Group (RTG) led by Raja, we are starting to see a more pro-active AMD. He has a lot more control and influence to make whatever decisions he feels are best specifically for Radeon graphics, while as part of the larger AMD, Radeon group wasn't as autonomous. Hopefully this means a lot of other changes in the future with respect to hardware & software strategies. A more focused, lean and autonomous Radeon group is going to be more competitive, at least in theory.
Last edited: