Ethereum GPU mining?

Page 128 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Yakk

Golden Member
May 28, 2016
1,574
275
81
IMHO, like bitcoin, ETH full node operators need to be compensated. Right now anyone operating a full node has tons of network traffic, uses power and CPU time without compensation. So nobody wants to run full nodes, which in turn slows down the network.

To test just run a full node yourself and log your network traffic & CPU usage over 24h.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
Each card at stock should gen around $230/mo after electricity (only .08/kwh where I am), based on Nicehash's card calc for 1080ti's. I'd need to be at home to see a calc of my benched cards specifically (or of the whole rig), but they should be roughly in line/slightly over. That'd give a total of $1150, not counting my gaming rig. With my slight OC, that might go up to $1200/1250/mo after electricity.

Power calcs only look to be predicting a bill of about $87/mo for 1500w which is about what I'm looking at with this rig, maybe a little more with the gaming rig's 1080. That's vastly surpassed by the incoming funds.

Thanks. That's helpful.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
Read this post?
https://forums.prohashing.com/viewt...18b83f5fc0de233b21b996408eceee&start=10#p6251

That guy is saying Eth will run into the same problems. Not sure what to believe lol.

That's a typical Bitcoin defence post that ignores some of the finer points in the article. It's a well written one though.

I agree Ethereum would run into the same issues if they don't do anything about scaling. Problem is, they have real concrete people with plans to address scaling (Sharding, Lightening Network, and then ultimately Proof of Stake) and have been working on addressing these issues for a long time. Will this solve the scaling issues if Ether replaces BTC in market volume and total market cap? Hard to say but given the history and the leadership within Ethereum I think they have some of the brightest developers doing their best to tackle this problem. If anyone has a chance of solving this it's problem them.

So while BTC becomes less useful or less utilitarian by the day for anything other than say perhaps ACH or long term storage (like digital gold), Ethereum continues to expand the platform to be used for well, almost anything. Speaking of clearing houses, do you think Banks will really adopt BTC where Ether has effectively gained considerable traction with the finance industry already?

I don't know but probably not.

Is it too late for Bitcoin?

Not as a simple storage or an alternative to precious metals but will this be enough to keep it relevant? With companies like Digix backing Ethereum over Bitcoin it may even make BTC irrelevant in the niche space it has left for itself.

The technical reasons for BTC needing to be around are becoming less by the day. Politically I worry if, or more likely when it fails it'll set a negative tone for all of crypto bringing down the value of the superior platforms with it.

Not surprisingly many people in this are only in it for the money so I could see a general panic and mass exodus for anything crypto related until things recover, which they will, as fundamentally there doesn't really exist any other technologies like Blockchains, especially one's as capable as Ethereum.

Time will tell as it always does but I think we're due for a real crash soon. As always I'll be holding Ether through these rough times like I did after the DAO and subsequent attacks as I still believe in the fundamentals and leadership (and likely will be buying more if I can afford to). Over the past few days I've traded 50% of my remaining BTC for Ether so my current position is closer to 90% Eth, 10% BTC which feels a little scary but given the current landscape seems like the right place to be in.

Curious what others plan on doing if the price crashes.

Will you sell or will you Hodl?
 
Reactions: ozzy702 and IEC

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,577
12,689
146
That's a typical Bitcoin defence post that ignores some of the finer points in the article. It's a well written one though.

I agree Ethereum would run into the same issues if they don't do anything about scaling. Problem is, they have real concrete people with plans to address scaling (Sharding, Lightening Network, and then ultimately Proof of Stake) and have been working on addressing these issues for a long time. Will this solve the scaling issues if Ether replaces BTC in market volume and total market cap? Hard to say but given the history and the leadership within Ethereum I think they have some of the brightest developers doing their best to tackle this problem. If anyone has a chance of solving this it's problem them.

So while BTC becomes less useful or less utilitarian by the day for anything other than say perhaps ACH or long term storage (like digital gold), Ethereum continues to expand the platform to be used for well, almost anything. Speaking of clearing houses, do you think Banks will really adopt BTC where Ether has effectively gained considerable traction with the finance industry already?

I don't know but probably not.

Is it too late for Bitcoin?

Not as a simple storage or an alternative to precious metals but will this be enough to keep it relevant? With companies like Digix backing Ethereum over Bitcoin it may even make BTC irrelevant in the niche space it has left for itself.

The technical reasons for BTC needing to be around are becoming less by the day. Politically I worry if, or more likely when it fails it'll set a negative tone for all of crypto bringing down the value of the superior platforms with it.

Not surprisingly many people in this are only in it for the money so I could see a general panic and mass exodus for anything crypto related until things recover, which they will, as fundamentally there doesn't really exist any other technologies like Blockchains, especially one's as capable as Ethereum.

Time will tell as it always does but I think we're due for a real crash soon. As always I'll be holding Ether through these rough times like I did after the DAO and subsequent attacks as I still believe in the fundamentals and leadership (and likely will be buying more if I can afford to). Over the past few days I've traded 50% of my remaining BTC for Ether so my current position is closer to 90% Eth, 10% BTC which feels a little scary but given the current landscape seems like the right place to be in.

Curious what others plan on doing if the price crashes.

Will you sell or will you Hodl?
I've been actively swapping every BTC I get from Nicehash for either cash, or Eth (depending on timeframe). I'm banking on (educated) predictions that Eth is going to overtake BTC for functionality, usability, and price.
 
Reactions: ozzy702

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
If ETH goes Proof of stake , does that mean No more mine for me ? what happen to Miners if that ETH becomes POS?

That's right. If Ethereum adopts proof of stake, at least in the current form they're suggesting, mining Ether long term is rendered pointless.

There will likely always be other coins to mine that rely on Proof of Work though so I wouldn't be too worried if you've invested into some mining gear
 
Last edited:
Reactions: IEC and PhonakV30

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
I've been actively swapping every BTC I get from Nicehash for either cash, or Eth (depending on timeframe). I'm banking on (educated) predictions that Eth is going to overtake BTC for functionality, usability, and price.

Probably a smart move. I'm pretty tempted to sell off some crypto for Fiat but as long as I have a stable job and can pay the bills and feed the family I'll be holding.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
14,577
12,689
146
Probably a smart move. I'm pretty tempted to sell off some crypto for Fiat but as long as I have a stable job and can pay the bills and feed the family I'll be holding.
It feels weird holding (or even buying) eth with debt, specifically from the BTC rig purchase. But hell, it's all just money, right? I'll probably extract as time goes on to payoff the investment.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,797
11,143
136
Probably a smart move. I'm pretty tempted to sell off some crypto for Fiat but as long as I have a stable job and can pay the bills and feed the family I'll be holding.

I'm not so sure ETH will crash. When BTC took a dive of 33% and took a lot of coins with it, ETH was one of the first to recover. I do believe ETH can/will correct to what it's "really worth" if it keeps pumping too fast, too soon, but at the same time, it's telling that each selloff sets a higher value floor for the coin.

Personally I planned for long-term investing with a target of $30-$40 ETH token price AFTER PoS saw implementation. It was never supposed to go this high before PoS even showed up. So hey no real skin off my nose if things get a little ropey.

A few other points I'd like to make that are probably relevant to the current discussion:

Proof of Stake will apparently only be used 1% (actually .099%) of the time:

http://www.coindesk.com/ethereums-big-switch-the-new-roadmap-to-proof-of-stake/

So mining will continue for awhile yet.

I also want people to consider the ramifications of an actual attempt by BTC holders to dump crypto for fiat.

Even the major exchanges like Kraken are beginning to experience liquidity problems. People looking to cash out inflated ETH (for example) for fiat may run into trouble. GDAX is apparently still reliable, but a few people are starting to experience trouble at Kraken and (to a lesser extent) Coinbase.

Combine this fact with the high transaction fees of BTC, the currently high failure rate of BTC transactions, and the long transaction resolution times currently plaguing the BTC blockchain, and you have a recipe for . . . actually, stagnation.

In order for BTC prices to actually drop due to a run on fiat, someone is going to have to agree to sell BTC for fiat at prices below the prevailing price. This behavior will have to continue for awhile, covering a large number of transactions, to meaningfully reduce the price of BTC. If you go to an exchange that has large quantities of BTC available for purchase (either in the exchange's own pool, or by linking sellers up with buyers who are willing to hold their BTC "on the exchange" rather than a private wallet), there's no problem. But selling? If the exchanges are experiencing low liquidity in fiat and there aren't a lot of buyers lined up to get your "discount" BTC, then how can you even complete a sale without agreeing to a massive price reduction at the time of sale?

As things stand, it would be much easier for BTC HODLers to convert their BTC to some other crypto than to try for fiat.

A big running of the bears for BTC might scare some of the new kids out of the market, but it's also going to drive a lot of market cap into other crypto coins. The only bear run on BTC that can hurt the other coins is if there's a push to cash out for fiat, which is technically becoming too difficult outside of one-off, brokered transcations.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
I'm not so sure ETH will crash. When BTC took a dive of 33% and took a lot of coins with it, ETH was one of the first to recover. I do believe ETH can/will correct to what it's "really worth" if it keeps pumping too fast, too soon, but at the same time, it's telling that each selloff sets a higher value floor for the coin.

Personally I planned for long-term investing with a target of $30-$40 ETH token price AFTER PoS saw implementation. It was never supposed to go this high before PoS even showed up. So hey no real skin off my nose if things get a little ropey.

A few other points I'd like to make that are probably relevant to the current discussion:

Proof of Stake will apparently only be used 1% (actually .099%) of the time:

http://www.coindesk.com/ethereums-big-switch-the-new-roadmap-to-proof-of-stake/

So mining will continue for awhile yet.

I also want people to consider the ramifications of an actual attempt by BTC holders to dump crypto for fiat.

Even the major exchanges like Kraken are beginning to experience liquidity problems. People looking to cash out inflated ETH (for example) for fiat may run into trouble. GDAX is apparently still reliable, but a few people are starting to experience trouble at Kraken and (to a lesser extent) Coinbase.

Combine this fact with the high transaction fees of BTC, the currently high failure rate of BTC transactions, and the long transaction resolution times currently plaguing the BTC blockchain, and you have a recipe for . . . actually, stagnation.

In order for BTC prices to actually drop due to a run on fiat, someone is going to have to agree to sell BTC for fiat at prices below the prevailing price. This behavior will have to continue for awhile, covering a large number of transactions, to meaningfully reduce the price of BTC. If you go to an exchange that has large quantities of BTC available for purchase (either in the exchange's own pool, or by linking sellers up with buyers who are willing to hold their BTC "on the exchange" rather than a private wallet), there's no problem. But selling? If the exchanges are experiencing low liquidity in fiat and there aren't a lot of buyers lined up to get your "discount" BTC, then how can you even complete a sale without agreeing to a massive price reduction at the time of sale?

As things stand, it would be much easier for BTC HODLers to convert their BTC to some other crypto than to try for fiat.

A big running of the bears for BTC might scare some of the new kids out of the market, but it's also going to drive a lot of market cap into other crypto coins. The only bear run on BTC that can hurt the other coins is if there's a push to cash out for fiat, which is technically becoming too difficult outside of one-off, brokered transcations.


All relevant points. Caveat about Coindesk. It's owned by Barry Silbert who's a major BTC / ETC proponent, or anti Ethereum. I would be wary of the information or articles on that site. He partially or fully owns a bunch of other things as well that negatively affect Ether (Coinbase, Poloniex) in that the number of available Eth pairs is artificially limited, and ETC is constantly pumped. He's also done some sneaky crap like this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/5p44z8/barry_silbert_set_to_profit_off_ethereum_name/

That aside here's more recent news from Vitalik WRT Ethereum scaling:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/article...reum-scaling-issues-popularity-asia-and-icos/

Definitely a challenge but these guys are up for it!
 
Last edited:

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,797
11,143
136
I have no real comment about Barry Silbert. There's too much said about him as it is. But your point does stand.

Personally I think Vitalik & Friends will figure out how to handle the scaling situation.

On a semi-related note, I saw an article claiming that BTC could reach $250k by 2020:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-price-will-hit-250000-by-2020-if-seven-year-trend-continues

I'm not sure why a daily percentage gain calculation is preferable to any other time slice (okay it allows daily compounding), but hey, why not? I chose the simpler route and went for time slices of one year instead of one day. Over the last year, Ethereum has risen from ~$14 per token (June 6th price, before the artificial run-up in value followed by the DAO hack) to ~$280 per token (current price today, though volatility seems high). In any case, that's an increase of 2000% per year. By 2020, that should make Ethereum worth ~$2.24 million. For. One. Token.

Ha!

Right.

Sometimes these speculative articles have to be taken with a grain of salt. Though, i must say, that guy on reddit who predicted $325 ETH by late June may not be that far off . . . $280? Really? No wonder video cards are in such short supply. The first person to start selling video cards for ETH via a dAPP is a genius.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,141
138
106
I imagine with the cost jump, the difficulty has jumped as well. I guess a 280x is not able to perform anymore.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
As much as I would like to see $250K Bitcoins or $2.24 million dollar Ether, I don't think it'll happen but I'm not going to pretend I have any real idea how much these coins will be worth in a year from now.

For me $286 a coin doesn't look too crazy as I saw what happened to BTC but I didn't think it would be so soon. How old is Ethereum again?

With Metropolis coming soon'ish, and all the talk about modularity, it'll be quite interesting when Ether just becomes another token like any other ERC-20 ICO token. This all seems kind of crazy at first but when you think about it, it allows for a more even playing field for other coins on the platform. This should make the Ethereum even more enticing to jump on by developers. This is what I love about the Ethereum Foundation. To have this level of confidence in rendering the main token (Ether) ERC-20 just like dozens of others tells me they're pretty damn confident in the future capabilities of the actual coin and platform.

Look at how many ERC-20 tokens have sprung up:

https://icostats.com

It's really starting to look like they may be on to something much bigger here. I just hope scaling will be addressed before real mass adoption else the more innovative ideas may never get off the ground. As ambitious as Ethereum was when starting out, it appears it has become even more ambitious which is kind of crazy. If they can continue this momentum then who knows what Ether will be worth in a year from now. I think it all boils down to how much value can you attach to something with hundreds of useful DAPPs and a platform with seemingly unlimited potential.

Fun times ahead!
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
I imagine with the cost jump, the difficulty has jumped as well. I guess a 280x is not able to perform anymore.

A 280X would likely be better off mining ZEC than Ether. Not 100% sure though.

Looks like Ether difficulty is around 640TH right now.

https://etherscan.io/chart/difficulty

Look at that curve!

With everyone building mining rigs it's pretty crazy. I haven't charted it but it looks like the difficulty may actually be outpacing the price increase of Ether, at least over the last month or so. One big price dip could scare off your average Ether miner bringing the difficulty down. We saw this last year after The DAO.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,797
11,143
136
I don't know that anyone will notice the difference when ETH goes ERC-20. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. It's my understanding that it'll always be "special" on the blockchain in that you will need ETH to pay for gas. None of the ICOs will be usable for that purpose . . . er, I don't think anyway.

Near as I can tell, right now, the difficulty curve isn't outpacing profitability as rated in USD. I've been mining for almost a year, and back when I was mining full-bore with the rigs I have now after the DAO hack (price had mostly recovered to $9-$11 per token and stayed that way until November), I recall getting maybe . . . $1.50 per MH/s per month or so? Maybe? Somewhere around there. And that was income, NOT profit. Power costs were not included in that figure.

If the profitability cited by deanx0r still obtains, he's getting ~$5.55 per MH/s per month profit, after taking into account power (not 100% sure he factored in power costs but he probably did). It looks like ETH profitability is up by at least 4x since late summer/early fall 2016.

ZEC profitability is pretty high, too. I am sticking with ZEC so my cards won't burn out on me, but right now it looks like I'm getting ~$.38 per Sol/S per month (keep in mind my stock Powercolor 390 is averaging 353.4 Sol/S according to the pool, and ~383.4 H/s according to Claymore 12.4). The same card would get, what 30 MH/s using Claymore's Ethereum miner, so it would probably score a little more per month mining ETH. I just don't like what the ETH algorithm does to my cards. At least two of them have had . . . shall we say, altered functionality after I started using them to mine ETH. Others took it like a champ. They all do reasonably well mining ZEC (including my old 2GB 270) so I just stick with that.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
Yeah you're right. With the rising price of Ether it's still much further ahead of the difficulty curve.

When I started mining Ether early last year the global hashrate was around 25 - 30TH

I stopped mining ZEC when the power usage increased and weird instabilities or crashing with the Claymore client started happening. Perhaps it's time to revisit though....

I should probably try switching back to ZEC on at least my older Hawaii and Fury cards to lighten the load a little on those rigs as they consume a good amount of power. The newer Ether Claymore releases have been pretty solid though. Dual Fury's consistently run at 64Mh at around 500W, and my 4x390 rigs generate roughly 110Mh at roughly 950W. I always run my rigs as cool and undervolted as possible and never shoot for those last few Mh they're capable of as that's risky and can lead to premature death (like dual mining). The amount of extra energy required to squeeze out the most in your cards is pretty big. Downtime is still the worst. Knock on wood but I've only killed one card mining (Geforce 1070) which was RMA'd and has been mining Ether solid for 3 - 4 months now and has easily paid for itself.

It'll be interesting to watch how AMD and Nvidia respond to this "problem". The idea of headless cards sound great until you try to resell them so I don't think anyone will bother buying those cards if the regular cards are still available for 10 - 25% more. Perhaps huge mining farms will but your average hobbyist miner with 10 cards or less shouldn't bother.
 
Reactions: IEC

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,354
5,012
136
My equipment paid for itself many moons ago. I doubt I would buy headless/gimped cards because the whole point is that the cards can be used for anything (compute, gaming, etc.) and so are easier to unload once you no longer want the hardware. Unless they were specially built for good power efficiency. Then I might consider them and reuse them afterwards for distributed computing projects.
 
Reactions: Madpacket

deanx0r

Senior member
Oct 1, 2002
890
20
76
Yesterday, I visited the local Microcenter where they had 10+ Viosiontek RX 570 and 10+ ASUS RX 580 in stock. There were priced $219 and $299 (RX 580) each, but Microcenter charged $349 each if you bought 2, $499 each if you bought 3+. People were still fighting over them, and their whole stock was cleared the moment the sales rep said they just received that shipment in the backroom. It was so surreal because it seemed like a mini black friday Microcenter edition.

I am kinda glad I didnt bite at that price. Because I checked their inventory at midnight to see if anything else was going to be on sale as they roll new ads every weekend. They had all their 1070 cards on sales with the Zotac 1070 AMP extreme going for $199. I was only able to pick four of them. There were other 1070s on sale for $299-329 with 10+ in stock. By the time I was trying to make up my mind about getting them too, they were cleared from the inventory (00:30am).

I saw the same deal come up a few hours later on reddit, and apparently, they are losing their shit over 1070s for $199,

https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapcsa...u_gtx_1070_sale_at_microcenter_in_store_only/
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,114
690
126
Yesterday, I visited the local Microcenter where they had 10+ Viosiontek RX 570 and 10+ ASUS RX 580 in stock. There were priced $219 and $299 (RX 580) each, but Microcenter charged $349 each if you bought 2, $499 each if you bought 3+. People were still fighting over them, and their whole stock was cleared the moment the sales rep said they just received that shipment in the backroom. It was so surreal because it seemed like a mini black friday Microcenter edition.

I am kinda glad I didnt bite at that price. Because I checked their inventory at midnight to see if anything else was going to be on sale as they roll new ads every weekend. They had all their 1070 cards on sales with the Zotac 1070 AMP extreme going for $199. I was only able to pick four of them. There were other 1070s on sale for $299-329 with 10+ in stock. By the time I was trying to make up my mind about getting them too, they were cleared from the inventory (00:30am).

Same situation at the KC Microcenter. I picked up a grip of 1060s and 1070s this weekend and the rep said the 570/580 cards are gone the moment they hit the shelves.
 

deanx0r

Senior member
Oct 1, 2002
890
20
76
Cloud mining is the only way to mine bitcoin for the average joe who doesn't have millions to invest in developing/manufacturing ASIC miners. Cloud mining is a riskier option for Ethereum if you cannot outsource your parts as GPUs and PCI-E risers are out of stock every where.
 
Last edited:

dajeepster

Golden Member
Apr 15, 2001
1,974
16
81
oh... and microcenter is no longer offering service plans for gpu alone. They're only covering the gpu under the more expensive aggregate plan (system build)
 

ozzy702

Golden Member
Nov 1, 2011
1,151
530
136
ETH is going to explode? jump from $260 to $316

I wouldn't be surprised if we see $500 by Aug 1. Insane, yes, but I'm fairly confident it will happen. At this rate I may be wrong by an entire month and it may be July 1...
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |